What Stops Me From Writing Off Tiger Woods
Joe Posnanski - one of my favorite storytellers, much less sports writers - reacted to Tiger Woods' T23 at the Open Championship by openly questioning if the Tiger Woods Era is done. Sure, reasonable question.
When they aired The Hills finale, I openly wondered if Lauren Conrad might finally exit pop culture despite having a whole other show. (Or so I'm told.) Seems more apt, though, to compare Woods' career to that of Betty White rather than the fleeting fame of Justin Bieber, or the vuvuzela.
Woods has dominated the sport for nearly as long as any golfer in the history of the sport. Nicklaus won his first major in 1962 and took his last some twenty-four years later. Realistically, though, Nicklaus' dominion over the major championships had three chapters.
From '62 to '75, Nicklaus nabbed all but four of his majors. Only one lengthy drought plagued his tally in the period - the Golden Bear couldn't win a major from the '67 US Open until the 1970 Open Championship, which was conveniently at St. Andrews. Were it not for Doug Sanders' rather unfortunate range with the putter, Nicklaus (in a total time vacuum, which Stephen Hawking would tell you does not exist) wouldn't have ended the 0-fer until the '71 PGA Championship at PGA National. Those 30" would have tacked on another four majors to Nicklaus' longest dry spell.
Instead, Nicklaus got back on track and only failed to win a major in one year of the first half of the 70s. It was his second major win of 1975 at the PGA Championship that Nicklaus stalled again. It was won at Firestone, where Tiger Woods absolutely murders the field on an annual basis in the World Golf Championships.
Ten majors later, Nicklaus again won at St. Andrews in 1978 to start a final tour through the Grand Slam that miraculously was capped in the '86 Masters. Leaving aside the outlier of that magical Sunday charge at Augusta, Jack stopped really winning majors in 1980. He was 40 then.
Woods turns 35 in December. Daring to make the comparison that Woods is like Nicklaus - and he is in more personal ways than you know - Woods has five full seasons of majors left after this season. He has twenty cracks to tie or surpass Nicklaus. Five more shots at Augusta. (Win two and he catches Jack.) Five more shots at the two Opens. And, yes, five more PGAs.
The National Open is at Congressional next year - site of his own tournament. Three of the next four are utter unknowns for Woods, though. He was terrible at Olympic Club in '98, where the Open will be contested in 2012. Then again, from USGA chatter, it may be completely different than what the field saw then. A trip to Merion - the first in over three decades - could be a bomber's paradise. Chambers Bay in 2015 is an absolute guess. The only "sure bet" there may be on Woods and a course is Pinehurst #2 in '14, where Michael Campbell became the ultimate fluke major winner in 2005.
The British Open has two favorable Woods venues. The Home of Golf gets its five year appetite fed in '15. The year prior, Royal Liverpool - where Woods played executive course golf to win four years ago. Next year, a return to where Ben Curtis shocked the world at Royal St. George's, but Tiger did finish 4th there in '03. Lytham in 2012 is where David Duval got his major in 2002, but frankly Woods was still hungover from his personal slam. Muirfield in 2013 is anyone's guess.
Let's just disregard the final major of 2010. Woods does not seem to buy into Pete Dye's Whistling Straits. In fact, Woods may only be good for one of the next five PGA Championships. We can shoot down Kohler again in 2015. Then there's a Woods Divorcee's Row of Atlanta Athletic Club, Kiawah Island - wind? pass - and Oak Hill. Only Valhalla looks good in '14, primarily because Bob May could not get lucky enough for three holes.
That leaves Woods on the cusp of Jack's record. Four combined favorable Opens, Augusta is always a threat (especially with the roars back), and a PGA or two. He has 11 realistic chances - barring some kind of massive swing, game, or life overhaul - to beat Jack. Five times in thirteen tries. Certainly aggressive, but not impossible.
The prism of today is that Woods' game is in such disarray - particularly his putting - that it would be inconceivable for Woods to win like he does. As Posnanski says, Woods got to fourteen by embracing the image of invincibility. Woods will have to change. Unlike Nicklaus, who became more of a course manager over time, Woods will have to become more aggressive. He can no longer sit back and wait for the field to fold. Frankly, he must act less like his sage golfing self and more like his reckless married self (on course only) if he wants to have the technical capacity to catch Jack in these next five years.
Now the age argument. Woods is getting older, not younger. He could get hurt more often. Then again, if you believe his medical assessment, he has been hurting for a decade.
Players start to win less after 32 or so. We could always cite the first time winner's list on Tour this season as evidence that the game could be passing Woods by and quickly. The same thing happened in '02 - Woods won two majors that year - and then the old guys struck back in '03. The British Open alone has produced old guy heroes in the last three years. Two came truly close to winning.
There are legendary examples of players winning and contending in majors long after their suspected shelf life. Ben Hogan, for one. Woods has used that comparison himself, though Woods was involved in a completely different car wreck. Sam Snead won two Masters from 40 and beyond. Hell, Julius Boros won two majors after 40, including a US Open. A US Open for crying out loud!
2010 is officially a throwaway for Tiger Woods. The year that could have been the greatest in major championship history turned into one of the great letdowns in the sport's memory. Instead of Woods, Woods, Woods, and Woods - like George Foreman's family - there has been Mickelson, McDowell, and Oosthuizen - like a law firm. Still it is hard to write off Woods completely.
The magnitude of the let down has critics and former worshipers of Woods wondering if Moses (Jack Nicklaus) is ready to come off of the mountain and demand that the world stop bowing to the Golden Calf. Perhaps the old man's record is safe. Maybe the rain out at the Champions Challenge was some sign that without Nicklaus, such a contest would be incomplete.
It's hard to say, though. Like a smart accountant will tell you, though, never write off anything for which you do not have a receipt. And it is not time to donate Woods' career to Goodwill.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Tiger write-off
I agree that it’s too soon to write off Tiger, Ryan. But it is a legit question and one that stays open as long as Tiger struggles, which could be a while.
Tiger’s ball-striking woes and swing challenges (especially with the driver) are nothing new. He seems like he’s made some progress. But the concern is the putter, in my mind, and it dates back a couple of years when he started missing big putts he used to always make in majors (Torrey US Open excluded). When the putts stop dropping on a regular basis, he won’t win — or not at the same clip. I’ve seen a lot of golf, and no one has putted like Tiger for a 12-year stretch. If that’s over, Tiger will not be the same.
Making putts breeds confidence. Missing putts breeds doubt (and doubt is your enemy on the golf course, something he hasn’t contended with throughout his career). When the confidence is gone, he is just another guy out there complaining about not making putts, or complaining about the greens like he did at the US. Open, which was a sign of weakness. (Tiger never complained when he rolled in everything on every type of putting surface known to humankind.) Confidence is everything. Tiger’s is shot.
By the way, Jack got written off a few times during his career, too, and he came back to win a few more.
by Armchair Golfer on Jul 19, 2010 5:37 PM EDT reply actions
I agree with most of what you wrote Ryan
But its all speculation at this point as nobody really knows for sure what evil lurks in the hearts of men. With so much talent out there these days, (as we have been witness to this year) anything and everything is possible. With Tiger struggling as of late, people finaly get to witness MANY of the talented players that abound on all tours by way of the television. Just last week while I was out at a dinner and speaking about golf and a boy of about 14 y/o says, “Hey mister have you seen that new guy on tour, Camilo Villegas ?” and he follows up saying, wow he can hit the ball a mile and I hope he wins so I can see him again on TV again. My point is that the more players that the GOLF MEDIA both on TV and written print speak about, the more interest the youth today will have in our great game of golf. Tiger has had a great run and in general has been a good asset for the PGA as a whole, however the game is much bigger than any one individual and I think its time to start promoting those that are winning on tour, so that the kids don’t think the game is just Tiger Woods and nothing else. jumpn/progolf
"pain is only weakness leaving the body"
One more things
Sales of the new Tiger Woods EA Sports video games are way off this year and that in itself could be because todays youth have had enough. JMHO
"pain is only weakness leaving the body"
In an effort...
…to help RB stave off any possible onset of Carpel Tunnel Syndrome…
RB – you could’ve written this post in three words after the headline.
“What stops me from writing off Tiger Woods”
and the answer is…“I’m not stupid” – ’nuff said. :-)
Good stuff, though I question your doubts for his ability to win any of the next five PGA’s. Aside from one golf course in the US, Woods has shown that he can win on any style and length golf course on the PGA Tour. He may not like all of them, but he can play them all.
This is all going to boil down to his ability to clear his mind (and many say his heart) of this mess he has gotten himself into and regain his ability to focus the way we have seen him in his career. There are people saying that he is on the downdside of his career – but that makes no sense. He is only 34, and golf tradition says that golfers don’t reach their full maturity until their 30’s. Then you add guys like Els and Mickelson, who are playing strong golf into their late 30’s, and Vijay well into his 40’s. Physically, you can’t count Tiger out of anything at this point.
It won’t be easy – the next generation is starting to smell a little age on these greats of the last 15-20 years, and they want their places in the history books.
But, as you say, only a fool would say that Woods is done. Up to this point in time, it has seemed like the only person who can take TIger down is himself, and the last 9 months have proven that to be very possible. Now he has to find out if he can fight his way out of this hole and get back to his former greatness inside the ropes.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Ok Court, I'll be your "fool"......He's done...stick a fork in him!
At least the dominating, intimidating and throat stomper we’ve seen the past decade. It’s much easier to comeback from surgery, injury or a long layoff than it is to get confidence in your putting back. This is something he’s never experienced and will be extremely difficult to overcome. For his whole life he’s been the best putter there was and that came from his unwavering confidence. Part of that confidence was from knowing that his incredible ability to make the unmakeable would bring sheer terror to his opponents. That’s gone……no one’s afraid of the big bad Tiger anymore. He may win some tournaments, and maybe a major or two, but he’s lost his swagger and everyone will be gunning for him. Remember this, even if he putts well for a round or two, or a tournament or two, the seeds of doubt have been planted and there’s no way to get rid of it……he knows now that he is not invincible.
The Saints ARE the SUPER BOWL CHAMPS....WHO DAT!
what's up, foo ? (sorry - can't get a mohawk here)
hey – you could be right – nothing is impossible. I’m just saying that I’ve made the mistake of writing him off in the past, only to get steamrolled a year or so later.
Holy smokes – the Cardinals are on a tear in the bottom of the 5th – back to back to back home runs.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
I hear ya......
but his putting has never been his problem. Tee to green he’s just another pro golfer, but his magic with the flatstick has always been his strength. I’ve always said if Tiger’s putting lights out, he’ll win big, if he’s putting good, he’ll win by a few, but if he’s putting average, he’ll contend…..there’s never been anything worse than average in tigers putting. That’s all changed. Everyone putted poorly at St. Andrews, but Tiger was worse than most…..35 putts in one round……shocking.
The Saints ARE the SUPER BOWL CHAMPS....WHO DAT!
don’t underestimate his ability to hit approach shots to the correct part of the greens.
Negative looking putting stats at St Andrews shouldn’t really be looked at without looking at where the approach shots finished. I don’t know of another course in the world where you can hit a par 5 green in 2 and still have 100 yards to the hole. Then again, there’s Louie and his measly two three putts all week. Amazing.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Putting...
He hasn’t putted great all season and he hasn’t been hitting great approach shots… yet he’s still on the leaderboard for all these events. That’s pretty amazing—he’ll be back eventually.
by 2ndSwingGolf on Jul 20, 2010 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, I'm sure ole Tiger is real excited
about that leaderboard thing. He’s already back…..this is the new Tiger…..get used to it.
The Saints ARE the SUPER BOWL CHAMPS....WHO DAT!
With the exception of Jack, Gary Player and Lee Tevino,
I can’t think of a true great who’s putting didn’t decline in their 30’s. Hogan,Palmer,Watson, Faldo all had those seeds well in them by their mid 30’s..Seve could still putt then but couldn’t hit a shot outside 180 yards. Is Tiger one of them who has lost it ? For well over a year now he has. His amazing putting won him 75% of his tournaments…if it is average, he would only win one or two a year…tee to green he is not the best…his chipping got him out the muck there too. Time will tell.
Heh
Even the articles like this one are starting to lose steam. No offence to you of course Ryan.
"pain is only weakness leaving the body"

by 













