Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Worst Team Ever Projected?

With Few Very Notable Exceptions, ESPN Excelled In Its First Full Open

Like they are in many areas, ESPN blazed a new trail this week from Scotland.  By airing four full rounds of the Open Championship from St. Andrews, it became the first cable outlet to carry full coverage of a men's major golf championship.  The Worldwide Leader already broadcasts portions of the Masters and US Open, but this was a new undertaking.  Not only was ESPN going to have the pre-cut rounds, they were going to get the live shot of the championship putt.

The network gave the Open Championship the full court press.  Per usual, the flagship SportsCenter program aired from the Old Course.  Of course, other platforms like ESPN Radio diverted people to the Open as best they could. The network even took the step of offering the BBC's coverage of the Open on their ESPN3.com platform.  The typical knock on ESPN's coverage of singular events is that they inundate potentially hostile audiences with overkill coverage of their vested interest.  ESPN did so again for the Open Championship, but fortunately for golf fans, it was not only done for a sport often neglected but well-executed.

Star-divide

It became clear that Paul Azinger had some kind of influence upon the proceedings.  ESPN created a pod system with broadcaster-analyst teams that were designed to have particular chemisty and rapport.  The lead team of Mike Tirico and the aforementioned Azinger harkened back to the former all star ABC Sports trio of these two and CBS talent Nick Faldo.  Scott Van Pelt sat with his normal major compadre, two-time US Open champion Andy North.  The other multiple US Open winner, Curtis Strange, as well as '73 British Open champion Tom Weiskopf split disembodied time between the teams.  Over the weekend, Terry Gannon was stationed with Tom Watson, who has made a nice addition to the team when he isn't busy trying to rewrite history books.

By and large, the strategy worked.  Tirico has evolved over the years from SportsCenter anchor into a top notch live announcer.  Tirico fully understands the pacing of the game and is thoroughly organized.  He is a consummate professional who is adept at keeping the full cast of characters - in booth and on course - involved in the conversation.  Simultaneously, he is able to corral Paul Azinger, who sometimes needs guidance and just a tinge of extra professionalism.  Zinger is only in the booth once per year now for an extended period, so the rust was evident.  At the same time, it was that raw nature of his broadcast style that made him appealing in the first place.  Tirico knows that and kept the right balance.

Van Pelt and North have been paired together for years for a resaon.  They have a natural chemistry.  SVP is a natural golf fan and enthusiast, coming from his Golf Channel roots.  He gives the proper respect and tone for these types of events, but can quickly become the tier one SportsCenter voice when in the right setting.  Van Pelt has a curiosity about the sport.  At the same time, he is enough a personality of force that he can inject humor and candor in the same moment, almost Alliss-esque in that way.  

The conversational style that Van Pelt has with North maximizes what the former Open winner brings to the telecast.  Not an Open expert, or really in touch with today's PGA Tour players, North does still offer a fundamental understanding of the rigors of major championship golf.  He communicates it almost in a colloquial way, bordering on folksy at times but in a good way.

Strange and Weiskopf - the men on Analyst Island - struggled.  Like Azinger, these men are rarely involved in calling golf.  Strange is brought in for other ESPN engagements, but has been panned for years in his capacity as analyst.  Strange simply makes too many mistakes, too many broad statements that do not further the conversation, and holds back the rest of the team.  In almost any other setting, Weiskopf would not be a fit.  He is far too quiet for a man of his experience and seems to say just enough for anyone to remember that he is on the team.  What he says, though, is amusing and interesting.  His laissez faire attitude on the mic really does jive well with the whimsy of the Open Championship.  Having him on the call of Miguel Angel Jimenez's ricochet at the Road Hole just made sense.

On course, Rocco Mediate - fresh off of breaking up with Callaway Golf - provided analysis.  Judy Rankin did the same in her mercurial style.  The commentary was helpful, not too instrusive.  Much of the golf spoke for itself and both knew when to keep quiet while allowing the boom mics to pick up the real action of the tournament.  

Tom Rinaldi and Wendy Nix did a suitable job in their role of interviewers.  They split time well across the many on-air hours for the network.  Rinaldi is the harder-hitting of the two, with clear force and a feeling of confidence in talking with any player.  It seems like ESPN hopes Nix can do the same thing, but across many sports.  She shows the potential to get there in time and watching some tape of Rinaldi's largely acclaimed five minute rush interview with Woods pre-Masters could expedite the process.

Throughout the week, a less constant group of contributors played roles in the telecast.  As has become tradition, BBC stalwart Peter Alliss joined the telecast for a can't miss hour when not being heard on the Interweb.  Alliss is the Vin Scully of golf brodcasting.  The man could air the entire Open by himself and no one would have complained.  (Also, this column would be much shorter.)  Because of his legend, it is a tease to have him for a mere hour of the show.  Considering that ESPN had 41 hours of coverage of the championship, less than 10% of it with Alliss is like having just the foam of a Boddington's.

Current European Ryder Cup captain Colin Montgomerie stopped by with delightful insights.  Monty has typically been the butt of many foot-in-mouth jokes over the course of his career, but he was thoughtful, honest, and engaging wearing the headset.  When his playing days are through - and his Open finish may indicate that is near - he could become a fantastic analyst.  Sure, he might enter Ben Wright territory, but that would not be the draw for the Scotsman.

Having Tom Watson in the booth was mild.  His lime green Sunday shirt was loud, but his role was not nearly prominent enough.  The runner-up of last year's Open and five time champion should have a bigger place at the table.  Instead, he seemed relegated to the Magic Wall that ESPN bought to presumably show the outline of the course and allow Watson to play meteorologist with wind direction.  Watson has so much more to offer and, in future engagements, hopefully he has the right space to share his stories.  Watson needs to be encouraged to speak up more, like he has about Tiger Woods in public, but without the edge.  Honesty works for Watson.  The humble routine has him buried among TV voices who are just begging him to shout a little.

The talent low of the week - again - was Rick Reilly.  Since signing with ESPN, Reilly has struggled to find his place.  Is he a print guy anymore?  Kind of, but the phenomenon replaced by Bill Simmons, then Will Leitch, has devolved into a shadow of his former self.  Reilly has been asked to convert the prime rib version of his writing into essayist work in golf, probably because the average golf viewer still recalls his glory days.  Reilly quickly dismissed Oosthuizen's chances going into the weekend.  He said he was rooting hard for John Daly. (Who isn't?)  The essays were contrived and seemed to lack a real emotional connection with the topic and the audience.  The Open has such a depth of history that there is no need for easy jokes, and golf has such a niche audience that it is almost insulting to offer such cursory analysis.  Jack Whittaker, Reilly is not.  Rich Lerner, Reilly is not.  As though Bristol was beaming Nielsen Portable People Meter results to Scotland in real time, Reilly was mercilessly moved to the tail end of the weekend telecasts or extricated altogether.  He was the only reason the clicker came out all weekend. 

We Agree. Thanks Matt! RT @mattpooch a @RichLerner essay is far better than the nonsense Rick Reilly comes up with! Lerner is a beast!less than a minute ago via CoTweet


Even Golf Channel isn't afraid to diss Reilly

ESPN avoided a potential disaster by keeping Chris Berman far, far away from St. Andrews.  He has never been a part of the ABC coverage of the Open, so it was not surprising to see him absent.  With MLB all-star festivities so close, Berman was unlikely to go to California for the Home Run Derby only to turn around and fly to Scotland just a week later.  It appears that the network is committed to his role in the US Open, but have left him off of coverage of the other golf majors.

If the network wants to bring a writer into the booth, bring in Jason Sobel.  He is not often in front of the camera, but the guy knows his stuff and, frankly, could be one of those guys that has real crossover potential in the game.

The people aside, ESPN employed some clever tactics to make the vagaries of links golf come alive for the less educated (read: geeky) golf viewer.  A live camera with technology to track the flight of the golf ball at the Road Hole showed the legendary shot over the Old Course Hotel in a whole new way.  Viewers could quickly gather if the strategy paid off for a player on the lengthened hole.  Constant wind maps of the course, along with the aforementioned Watson-guided Magic Wall, oriented viewers to the course and the lay of the property relative to the sea.  With how frequent the wind changed at the Old Course, the production communicated the changes well.  

The golf action was frequent.  It was a good mix of studio analysis and the Open itself.  When long delays inherent to links golf chopped up play, the network went to other storylines.  The breadth of players showed by the network was a delightful change.  Yes, Woods got his time, but Jin Jeong did too.  The comebacks of Fowler and McIlroy from disatrous rounds were a highlight.  Tom Lehman was not forgotten.  The network used the full complement of stories to make best use of a lot of dead air from the final groups on Sunday.  When Oosthuizen was running away with the championship, the players that were also-rans to the South African's celebration had their proper due.

Grading the championship for the Worldwide Leader, the full package earns a solid B+, if not an A-.  There is a reason that the R&A was sold on ESPN.  Initially, it may have been the multiplatform distribution network and the incessant attention paid to Bristol's vested interests.  When the cameras rolled, though, the network largely broadcast the championship with the right mix of talent, technology, and theater.  The team could clearly benefit from being leaner in several places, but the end result was an admirable first attempt at sharing the World's Open with the globe.

Comment 71 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I have to admit that I thought ESPN would screw the pooch covering this Championship. They all too often focus too sharply on one player or team in the sports they cover, and I thought it an almost certainty that they would fawn over Tiger Woods even if he were in 14th or 44th place. They did cover him deeply when he was in the mix, but dropped away from him when it was clear he wouldn’t win. Good call and it gave me new-found respect for them.

The one thing they should have done with all of their announcers is made sure they saw Louis Oosthuizen pronounce his name for Wendy Nix, and learn how to say it. It was comical, but in a way insulting that over the three days the South African dominated the Open Champion story none of them could get it quite write. It wasn’t like Oosty was a Ju/ʼhoansi bushman named Nǃxau (the actor who was the star of The Gods Must Be Crazy) and that leaning how to say his name meant learning how to pronounce letter totally foreign to them, it was almost as if they refused to give the man enough respect to learn how to say it.

I also thought at times that Weiskopf sounded like a grumpy old man, chiding players for some of their tactics the same way Wilbert Brimley snapped at his grandkids on that insipid family show that he starred in back in the day. It was definitely less than charming to me and a couple of times got a bit of an eye roll from both me and from my wife.

Other than that. it was a pleasure to watch.

Golf Channel, on the other hand, was its usual self, with its usual insipid coverage. Really, Brandall Chamblee, your on-air fellating of all things Tiger Woods is just embarrassing.

by Charles Boyer on Jul 18, 2010 10:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Tell me you’re not angling for a job at ESPN…and make me believe it. ESPN was horribly over produced. Azinger was about as bad as Curtis Strange with their constant babble. All Tirico remembers about golf is Par 72 and a handful of cliche’s. Who knows what happened to Van Pelt – his sense of humor around the game is gone. And Terry Gannon proved to be a steadily flowing stream of nonsense. Gannon felt the need to tell the audience that John Daly’s pants were the American flag, for god’s sake. There were way too many voices wanting to get in too many words. Too many non-golf people reading too many useless statistics that were already on the screen for the viewers to read. The inclusion of Judy Rankin was a huge mistake. We already know she doesn’t understand the men’s game – is it necessary to take her to Scotland to prove it…again ? Seah McDonough was tolerable for a change – but mostly because he didn’t try to say much…possibly because he was afraid to move thinking his tower was going to fall over in the wind. :-)

Tom Rinaldi was a C- at best, and outside of asking Oosthiuzen how to pronounce his name…which was immediately ignored by everybody on the broadcast….she was useless. It was like listening to the halftime walkoff interview at a football game.

The highlight of the team ? Rocco Mediate – because he enjoys talking about the game and understood what the players were looking at. Andy North was ok, but like the rest of the broadcast, there were too many voices.

The idea that they needed that many people would hold up if they weren’t all there at the same time with enough open mics to have anything left for the viewers.

The blame goes to the producer who picked the team and let them run wild like a pack of kindergarteners on a sugar high. They had no fear. WAY too much talking – not enough letting the picures tell the story.

The one thank you to ESPN ? They didn’t bring Berman.

By the way – ESPN/ABC did screw the pooch on Saturday when ESPN switched to ABC, and they immediately put on some lame Georgetown reunion show for more than an hour, then started showing replays.

This was not good.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 18, 2010 10:32 PM EDT reply actions  

I thought ESPN did a pretty good job of full coverage

And PALEEEEEASE about the ‘lack of tiger fawning’, Mike Tirico couldn’t and didn’t shup up about tiger. He played the role of Head Cheerleader All 4 days with all of his fawning and drooling. At the start of Sundays round he commented that it would be tiger that would have the only chance of catching up to the leaders of the players that were at -3 or -4 catagory. We now know that was a big mistake. On TGC “Live From” Sunday Night, OMG. Never mind I’m sure you can figure it out.

"pain is only weakness leaving the body"

by progolf on Jul 19, 2010 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Did you notice that at no time did any of these guys put Tiger’s name in the mix of all time great field-lapping performances ? They mentiioned Old and Young Tom Morris, and that it hadn’t been done like that since WWII – but wouldn’t say “he beat the field better than Tiger Woods.”

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 19, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I, for one, would like to thank

ESPN for allowing me to watch about a gazillion hours of golf this week-end. As for the announcing team…..they don’t seem nearly as bad now that I’ve spent close to a year here on WR listening to court and a few others eviscerate anyone who has the audacity to pick up a microphone. I suppose if all the media types would put a space before their question marks, court would be more tolerant…..:)

The Saints ARE the SUPER BOWL CHAMPS....WHO DAT!

by em66 on Jul 19, 2010 7:12 AM EDT reply actions  

LMAO!!

Perfect commentary.

"(I)f you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinsky

by dianemarie on Jul 19, 2010 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

and a friendy hand gesture to the two of you, too ! :-)

Excuse me for wanting and believing that these broadcasts can be better.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 19, 2010 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

They had the entire Open Championship on television in the US!!

Yup, it could have been better. But the standard you demand, nothing short of perfection, is pretty much unattainable. So you take what you get, thank gawd Johnny Miller was nowhere to be seen, and appreciate what they did accomplish, oh tortured soul.

"(I)f you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinsky

by dianemarie on Jul 19, 2010 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

My feeling is that broadcasting 41 hours, they did a really nice job with it. If you took a particular six or seven hour segment, maybe not as good.

Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroom, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.

by Ryan Ballengee on Jul 19, 2010 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

actually – they didn’t. they had a LOT of it – and ABC screwed up on Saturday and we didn’t get to see the last 6 holes with the leaders because they ran that stupid Georgetown show.

You’re confusing quantitiy with quality. It doesn’t take “perfection” to tell these guys to shut the heck up. It doesn’t take perfection to find guys who have some joy in the game. It doesn’t take perfection to find a couple of hosts who know a little about the game and don’t sound like walking cliche’s.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 19, 2010 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, let’s be constructive here then. I know you would put up Brian Katrek (who I’m listening to right now, way to get on the show today), but who would you have anchor golf telecasts?

Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroom, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.

by Ryan Ballengee on Jul 19, 2010 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd go with Rodney Dangerfield

and perhaps Happy Gilmore. A funny and educational broadcast it would make indeed.

"pain is only weakness leaving the body"

by progolf on Jul 19, 2010 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ok – the broadcast doesn’t start with the talent – it starts with the producer, who picks the on air talent. Whoever it was for ESPN never gets to do golf again…especially if, as you suggested, he was addle brained enough to let Paul Azinger get his “pod” system in the mix. (a very funny line, by the way – but they really didn’t set things up terribly differently than usual)

Hosts – Dan Hicks does an OK job, but he’ s stuck with Johnny Miller and his aimless rambling. He probably has the toughest job of any of the hosts. Hicks would be really good if Miller didn’t leave him feeling that he had to fill in so many gaps. Miller makes up so much stuff, it’s like they’re not watching the same tournament. Tirico used to do a terrific job, but he’s stretched very thin doing so many other sports. He needs to be taken down a notch or two to remember that he is not a former player – he’s a traffic cop who is supposed to take the show in and out of commercials, move from hole to hole, and ask halfway intelligent questions of the fomer players doing analysis. Jim Nantz – you can stay in the studio and do voice overs. Great pipes – but the ego is out of control. Katrek gets Nantz’s spot since they do more golf than anybody.

Hey – I get to be on Southern Golf Weekly this week for the news and comments segment. Woohoo. (I’ll probably be the blurry blue dot on the screen so the audience doesn’t run screaming to another channel) :-)

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 19, 2010 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Blurry Blue Dot ?

You dressing up as a Viagra Pill for the show ?

"pain is only weakness leaving the body"

by progolf on Jul 19, 2010 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

LMAO !!!!!

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 19, 2010 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

By the way Gang

I remember all the talk, pre-tournament by all the talking heads and us in here about odds and wagering. I seem to recall mentioning the odds on favorite by the bookies was TW at 6-1 and I commented that, those bookies are in it to make money and not to make winner predictions. Told ya. hehehehe I also stated TW would finish outside of the top-15 this week. “Special thanks” to my Friend and Playing Partner at Sawgrass and huge Tiger Woods fan, Marcus for making that bet with me regarding Mr. Woods finishing outside the top-15. The drinks are on him for the next month. lmao

"pain is only weakness leaving the body"

by progolf on Jul 19, 2010 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

way cool

Will the episode be available on the Web site? If so, when?

"(I)f you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinsky

by dianemarie on Jul 19, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

End of the week…but I make no promoses to replace any broken monitors !

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 19, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

you'll post a link????

"(I)f you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinsky

by dianemarie on Jul 19, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Court,

I understand that you work in the media and are making your comments from your prospective as a professional (blue dot???) in your field. What you need to understand is that I don’t really care about the announcers (or producers) when I tune in to watch a sports event. I do like the “funny” guys, but beyond that I don’t even pay attention to the talking heads…..I don’t have the expertise to judge their capabilities as announcers, so as long as they are not offensive, then they don’t bother me. I watch the golf and for as long as I can remember the announcers were not a problem…..now I pay too much attention to the talkers. If you could, in the future, put “MEDIA CRITICISM” in the header of your comment, I will skip that one and hopefully eventually purge the media toxicity from my brain and start enjoying the telecasts again…….:)

The Saints ARE the SUPER BOWL CHAMPS....WHO DAT!

by em66 on Jul 19, 2010 11:32 AM EDT reply actions  

I did that ! I kept the broadcast criticism to one specific thread..unless someone else brought it up.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 19, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I enjoy Court's criticisms of the media. It's his field, though he seems quite a competent

utility fielder.

His only mistake, in my opinion, is when, for some odd reason, he disagrees with my opinion.

by TXQ on Jul 19, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Suck up.......:)

The Saints ARE the SUPER BOWL CHAMPS....WHO DAT!

by em66 on Jul 19, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

For all the pros and cons of ESPN's coverage...

I found it extremely refreshing that they showed so much of the Open and so many of the players. No matter how good or how bad the broadcast team may be, there’s no way they’re going to be on their game for over 40+ hours. To my knowledge, nobody’s ever tried to give a golf tournament this much coverage, and the only way to get better is to do it several times.

I’m giving ESPN really high ratings just for having the nerve to try it. This week, “the only channel completely devoted to golf” was NOT TGC.

Mike Southern
www.ruthlessgolf.com

by Ruthless Mike on Jul 19, 2010 11:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes, and thank goodness for that. GC has become so sycophantic that I cannot bear to watch it much at all these days.

by Charles Boyer on Jul 19, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree OMP

That Howdy Doody look-a like Craig Kahn is the worst of the lot.

"pain is only weakness leaving the body"

by progolf on Jul 19, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

So...

now you don’t like Howdy Doody????

The Saints ARE the SUPER BOWL CHAMPS....WHO DAT!

by em66 on Jul 19, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

A real stiff!

The Saints ARE the SUPER BOWL CHAMPS....WHO DAT!

by em66 on Jul 19, 2010 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I recall Dilly Dally, Mr. Bluster, Chief Thunder Thud (great name)

and the foxy Princess Summer Fall Winter Spring, who, I’ve read, put out for the entire cast, including Buffalo Bob and a few of the more popular puppets. No strings attached in each case.

by TXQ on Jul 19, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hah! Agreed. He should speak as much as Clarabell spoke.

To save Wendy the email time/expense: Clarabell was a speechless clown on an old TV show called “The Howdy Doody Show.”

by TXQ on Jul 19, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

If it weren’t for Brandall Chamblee’s homo-erotic man-crush on Tiger Woods, I would agree.

Then again, Andrew Magee is just a buffoon, period.

by Charles Boyer on Jul 19, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is Magee still on ?

Have not seen him in a long while.

"pain is only weakness leaving the body"

by progolf on Jul 19, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am not sure. Other than drooling during Big Break and watching Golf In America, I hardly ever watch anything on GC any more except for tournament coverage.

We did catch some Golf Central the other day and my lovely wife sent me to the floor crying with laughter when she said Chamblee sounds like Woods girlfriend.

by Charles Boyer on Jul 19, 2010 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

hahahahahaha

Kelly thinks she is. Lerner is running a close second, “but he’s on the cheerleading squad”, and Hoggard, FUG ET A BOUT IT.

"pain is only weakness leaving the body"

by progolf on Jul 19, 2010 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

It sounds as though you had excellent coverage

& thanks to RB for allowing me to peek into that coverage.

Our rotating team of commentators (Peter Alliss, Ken Brown, Wane Grady, Sam Torrance, Mark James, Jean van de Velde & Andrew Cotter, with Maureen Madill & Philip Parkin on the course, & Hazel Irvine & Dan Walkers as anchors) are all experienced. Apart from the odd “Oh do shut UP!” muttered at the screen, I thought they all did a pretty good job. One irritation, as per Wendy Nix, Jean van de Velde said on air to the whole team that he had asked Oosthuissen how to pronounce his name; it was totally ignored by said team throughout the broadcast as well.

by WendyUK on Jul 19, 2010 12:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Everyone is scared to say his name......

he should change it to Smith.

The Saints ARE the SUPER BOWL CHAMPS....WHO DAT!

by em66 on Jul 19, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Torrance was awful

he would get excited like a child before the ball had stopped rolling. Also, he always goes on about what good lads the Brits are, almost like Ryder cup mode. He really has to go.

by Easingwold on Jul 19, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh come on - surely not "awful"

He overdid his comments at a certain RC however.

by WendyUK on Jul 19, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know he is popular

and I don’t think he is bad by American commentator standards…but he is next to Alliss Grady and Brown..I even put plant pot James ahead of him. But, hey…each to their own :)

by Easingwold on Jul 19, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

None of which should be confused with..

Pot Plants or Pot Brownies

"pain is only weakness leaving the body"

by progolf on Jul 19, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mark James is a very keen gardener

he has said before he enjoys it more than golf…what a missog,, lol

by Easingwold on Jul 19, 2010 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like gardening myself

But it aint golf. But James did admit once he was in golf for the money. A bit like Scot Hoch. He never smiled a lot either.

by Easingwold on Jul 20, 2010 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

"Wuhst-hy-zen"

Now, was that so hard?

Try saying “Nǃxau.” (“enn-click-saw”) The click is a sound from putting your tongue on the roof of your mouth. I certainly can’t do that with any competence.

by Charles Boyer on Jul 19, 2010 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Good Coverage

It’s not easy being on the air as long as ESPN was each day and I think they did a pretty decent job of covering the event. Small notes for next year:

1) Ban Tom Watson from referring to the course as an “ol’ gal” or otherwise using female metaphors to describe “her” condition.
2) Inform Paul Azinger that, while it may have been a big deal to Ben Hogan (who fought a hook for the better part of his career) most professional golfers are capable of playing in a left-to-right wind. And, given they’ll be playing holes against a left-to-right wind, they certainly don’t mind practicing in one. Azinger made it sound as if players wouldn’t even practice if the wind was blowing left-to-right on the range. Hell, if my knowledge of the game consisted of Azinger’s on-air commentary, I would’ve been amazed each time a right-handed player recorded anything better than a double bogey on a hole that had a left-to-right wind. If you don’t want to completely ban him from making these comments about the wind, at least limit them to once every four hours.
3) Scott Van Pelt is one cool dude but he’s got to loosen up a bit and get back to his Golf Channel days.

Jim Dauer
Tired of getting paired up? Check out FullForesome.com.

by jimdauer on Jul 19, 2010 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Ever since the days of the Morris duo, folks have periodically referred to the Old Course in feminine terms.

That’s probably due to its capricious and unpredictable nature, often replete with howling gales. Call that sexist in the modern age if you will, but its the same line of thinking that had ships and hurricanes referred to with female metaphors as well. Hurricanes may be unisex these days, but sailors of all types still refer to their vessels as “she.”

by Charles Boyer on Jul 19, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lol..

before periscopes were invented no doubt

by Easingwold on Jul 19, 2010 4:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Comment below from another site. Enjoy. Not mine.

Did you all catch Azinger remembering Ross Fisher’s comeback win at the 2008 Ryder Cup in the team match against Kim and Mickelson when Fisher was not even a member of that team?! He actually repeated that story twice. Did nobody at ESPN notice the first time?

by TXQ on Jul 19, 2010 5:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Waggle Room! Join our community!
Have a golf story tip? Contact editor Charles Boyer and he will follow the story! Thanks!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

274_small
How Tiger Woods Crushed American Tennis
Small
Man could lose leg after being stabbed by a golf club
Biggie-worldtrade_small
The New Normal
Dmbase_small
sorry em
Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
Shame on Tlighman and xxx Golf Channel for Ambushing Matt Every
Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
Do you use music to help your swing rhythm ?
Small
Waggle Room Fantasy Golf League Is Alive and Well
Outside-two_small
Charles ? Will there be a Waggleroom Fantasy Golf Again in 2012 ? Hope so.
Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
New Toy Demo
Small
Day 3 @ 2011 Golf Dubai World Championship Live

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


MANAGER

Charles-1_small Charles Boyer

AUTHOR

Emily_kay_small Emily Kay

Img_0611_small Adam Fonseca