Home of the Brave: Creamer Takes First Major in Open at Oakmont
Paula Creamer had hit her approach shot safely on the 18th and final green of Oakmont Country Club. With four shots to spare against par, Creamer could take five putts from forty feet to win the United States Women's Open - the championship that matters most to female professional golfers of any nationality. Though it certainly was not out of the realm of possibility on the uber demanding, endlessly undulating greens of Oakmont, the championship was hers.
The crowd gathered around the last hole, there to greet the victor five and six deep in places, struck up a rousing ovation for Creamer. Morgan Pressel and Meaghan Francella - friends of Creamer's - plunked themselves down inside the ropes to greet her and struck up a small but spirited "U! S! A!" chant, overheard and joined in by some of the crowd near them.
The party had already begun before Creamer had sank the final putt. It was difficult for the fans to contain themselves with glee, but managed a hushed whisper for Creamer's approach putt. For a short second, it looked like the putt might find the bottom of the cup. It slid by just two and a half feet. Now the celebration was guaranteed.
Her playing partners holed out to clear the stage. With girls held up by their fathers to spot a glimpse of the finale, Creamer holed the winning putt. As the ball disappeared in the ground, Creamer dropped her putter - a traditional putter new in the bag this week - to the ground and covered her mouth with both hands. It finally hit her.
She had made up for the missed cut last week in Ohio. She had silenced the critics. Paula Creamer had finally won her national championship by four shots.
"I always think an American should be on this U.S. Open trophy," Creamer later said expressing the pride that is evident in her nearly flawless Solheim Cup record. " It is the U.S. Open, so I do think that that's an important thing."
It all seemed to happen so quickly, though there was so much more to her championship week than that. The crowds rose and applauded Creamer as she beamed and hugged and smiled and slapped hands on her way to the clubhouse to sign her scorecard.
Turning the corner out of the public eye, Creamer wiped tears away from her face, her mascara running halfway down her face. She embraced her mom. Her caddie Colin hugged her mom. It looked as though every USGA staff member wanted to hug her. An American had finally broken what seemed like a lengthy drought at the national championship.
One USGA senior staffer told me, "This is just what we needed."
Creamer is the first American champion at the Open since '07 when Cristie Kerr broke through at Pine Needles. Korean players had won the prior two years. Prior to Kerr, the last American to win was Meg Mallon - who, perhaps appropriately, withdrew and retired from professional golf before the tournament began. Mallon said she had lost the fire to compete and it was time to leave it to players that had the zest to win - players like Paula Creamer.
Long a fan favorite, the 24 year old spent several minutes signing autographs before speaking with the media. Sitting down to answer questions, Creamer was announced as the 2010 US Women's Open champion. Creamer sunk her face in her left hand, still incredulous that descriptive phrase her name went in order.
The final round was no coronation. Hardly. Creamer began the final round just after 12:15 and faced nearly six hours of true examination. It began in her head, where she remembered everything that had gone wrong in the past at the Open - the 3rd round 79 at Saucon Valley, the final round 78 at Interlachen (headline: "Paula Creamer loses it"), another 79 on the last day at Cherry Hills.
‘I think [this] happened because of all what's happened in the past at major championships," she said. "I've always remembered, you know, what has happened in the past, and I've tried to recognize it when it's happening in the present."
The present was the first hole - the toughest all week with a diabolical pin on Sunday. Creamer took it to the course and the field early with par, which was practically a birdie. That, though, was not the game plan. Aggression could never be the game plan at Oakmont.
"I want to be aggressive. I'm an aggressive player just naturally. ... Being super‑aggressive has kind of hurt me in the past.
"Here just the punishment is just so much worse when you are more aggressive."
It truly was one hole at a time - from the start. "[My caddy Corey and I] played the first hole and we said, ‘Okay, 17 more. 16 more. 15 more.'"
The plan, though, looked like it might lead to ruin on the front side. Mike Davis and the USGA sought to make scoring possible on the front nine on Sunday. With five of the nine easiest holes situated sixth through ninth in the Oakmont gauntlet, Creamer had earlier challengers.
At the par 5 fourth, Creamer opted to play it as a three shot hole by hitting four-rescue off of the tee. It led to an inexplicable bogey considering the momentum and consistency she had cultivated throughout the weekend. But she quickly bounced back. Her approach to the short yet treacherous fifth was a great bounce back after the disappointment on four. She made birdie there to make up for the prior hole's miscue. Little did she know that Suzann Pettersen missed a short birdie putt of her own on that hole just minutes beforehand that would have cut Creamer's lead to a single shot.
Pettersen made par at six, but Creamer struggled off of the tee on that hole on Sunday. Her tee shot was left and long, bunkered in a pot of sand more reminiscent of St. Andrews than western Pennsylvania. Creamer extricated herself well and made an impressive and potent up-and-down to save par.
Creamer came to the eighth, facing the longest par three test this Open had to offer. Now, though, her new challenger was Na Yeon Choi. Choi went out in 31 with an emphatic eagle at the ninth. Not only did Creamer have to worry about the Choi rally, but so did Johnny Miller and his precious 63 from 1974. Paula calmly made par on eight, then took advantage of the par 5 ninth - shortened some thirty yards from the day prior, she made a routine birdie. Now -2 for the championship, her lead and the title seemed rather secure.
Three holes later, Creamer's armor had a chink in it. More specifically, it was her thumb. Creamer miscued off of the par 5 tee into a fairway bunker so deep that she could only advance the ball some forty yards out of it, if that. Creamer appeared to wince in pain, perhaps enhanced by knowing a bigger number was now possible. However, she minimized the damage and escaped in bogey.
Thirteen was the money hole. If Creamer could right the ship and get through this par 3, she knew the tournament was almost assured to her.
"[After 13], there are some difficult holes, but I thought if I could maybe go around 1‑under, I might have a good chance of pulling it out," she recalled.
With a par at 13, she was even on the round. Her lead was smaller and she was one stroke off of her target, but things were looking good. Bouncing back after a bogey was important to Creamer from as far back as she can remember.
"[M]y dad and I, when I was younger, have always paid a pretty good amount of respect to bouncing back.
"For me, that's just something I've always done, and in this situation it makes it so much sweeter. I've practiced it over and over the last several years, and that's something that I kind of know I can rely on."
The assurance from the par at 13 led Creamer into the next two holes. Fourteen was short all week, but the pin was accessible though challenging on Sunday. Creamer knew this was an opportunity to be aggressive and let her true self show. She sank a birdie putt to get back to red figures for the day.
Creamer's approach to putting throughout the week really was on display at that hole.
"Normally you want to go in the back of the hole because the greens aren't 14 on the Stimpmeter. We really focused on dying putts into the hole, and I think we got in a good rhythm. It's confidence. You know, you make one, there's no reason why you can't make two."
She did just that on the fifteenth. The second largest par four on the course yielded nine birdies on the day. Creamer made certain she was part of that group with a killer approach that sealed the win. As Creamer hit her approach, crowds flanking parts of 14, 15, 17, and 18 all turned and applauded. A few "Go Paula!" cheers echoed through the last corner of Oakmont's puzzle.
Still, it was not clear to Creamer just how well off she was when she arrived to seventeen. Caddy Colin Cann suggested that she lay up on the 228 yard par 4 with a five-iron. It was a shot they had not even considered all week.
"I kind of had a feeling on 17 that I had a couple‑shot lead, because that was that front box, and I said I would always hit driver off that front box, and today I laid up. Colin was kind of like, you know, Well, you can lay up, 5‑iron. I'm like, What? What do you mean?
"The front box I've always hit driver. I hit driver, you know, this morning. I hit driver yesterday off that box," Creamer explained.
She told Cann, "'Okay, well, I'm trusting you with this layup here off the tee. ‘"
Her lay-up to 75 yards or so left her with a shot that made her uncomfortable. "[I]t's one of the hardest wedge shots in golf I think, or that I've ever had to play," she said but executed well to give herself a par, a four shot lead on the last, and just 450 yards from the trophy.
Which brings it all back to the scene at 18. Standing there, taking in the scene in the exact opposite angle as the new champion, her father stood next to me for the final putt. Despite being fairly tall, Mr. Creamer couldn't see his daughter's final distance. The joy on his face, though, when she made the putt made it clear he knew what had happened.
Paula's father - a pilot - spent twelve years of his life in Butler, Penn., not too far from the golf club. His daughter researched, discovered, and attended David Leadbetter's Bradenton Academy to foster a better opportunity at golf success. The circle of life returned to his home.
"I think he liked it, too, being from here," Creamer said with a smile.
Bizarrely enough, Creamer seemed to have believed from the start that despite being a self-described 60% throughout the week that this might have been her time.
"[I] was funny, because we have had a lot of just little signs, you know, this week where, you know, we think might happen or could this be the week," she hinted. Repeatedly, Creamer made reference to her credo that things happen for a reason. The thumb injury, the prior major heartache, everything. All for a reason all too clear now.
At the onset of the week, Creamer asked Arnold Palmer for his advice on how to survive Oakmont.
"Don't three putt and keep your head down," the King said. Creamer obliged as best she could. A few three putts, yes, but kept in the moment until the moment was finally hers to own.
With a shiny new trophy - the oldest in women's golf, littered with legendary names - to stare at and the better part of a million dollars in her pocket, Creamer can finally let herself indulge in two gifts for the achievement. One is a new purse, a Birkin bag.
The other? Skydiving. Lost up in Cloud Nine, she almost forgot about that self-promise until asked.
"[S]kydiving was something, too. That's right. If I won my first major we were gonna go skydiving."
Excuse Creamer if it takes her a little while - the rest of her life, even - to come off of this high. No rush from jumping out of a plane could replicate the crazy, thrilling, and satisfying journey of winning the National Open through 72 grueling holes.
52 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is why I enjoy reading your blog.
A nice story told very well. Despite confusing Illinois (State Farm) with Ohio (Jamie Farr), this was one of your better efforts. Keep up the excellent work.
Congrats to Paula......A great win!
USA….USA….USA……..
The Saints ARE the SUPER BOWL CHAMPS....WHO DAT!
Superb Play
Paula Creamer, I imagine ones first Major win is the greatest.
Michelle Wie, MC I hear she was autographing Happy Meals at the local McDonalds on Saturday. LOL
"pain is only weakness leaving the body"
Well done Paula Creamer, but
How dumb was it to say “I always think an American should be on this US Open trophy”. Whats that all about ? It’s an international field and the best player that week goes on the trophy. it shouldn’t matter where they were born.
The LPGA is a worldwide tour based in the US, but it’s struggling here. Having stood next to Ms Creamer for all of about three seconds one day four years ago I don’t exactly know what she was thinking, but I’d guess it was a “throw away line” designed to attract more interest here then anything else.
I doubt she’d say only a player from the UK should win the Women’s British Open, or that only a French woman should win at Evian.
"(I)f you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinsky
I think she kind of sees the USWO trophy as like the Solheim Cup – just something that she would prefer an American to hold.
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroom, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Jul 12, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions
What’s wrong with that Eas ? She’s an American playing THE biggest American women’s golf tournament – she’s excited and proud of her country. Get over it. You can’t tell me that you wouldn’t be thrilled to have a Brit’s name on the Claret Jug every year.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Accually no
I’m thrilled for a Brit to win it, but I marvel at the best golf..even Tiger. The Ryder Cup, exciting golf though it is, puts me right off that nationalistic crap. It’s nice to cheer on your own, but golf is a world game. One of the cool things about our Open is that Brits cheer for where ever they are from. Nedal got cheered even when besting Murray at Wimbledon and it’s the same with golf. Creamer was being nieve…prefering is fine…saying they should is different. She probably said what she did in light of recent international domination of the majors in the women’s game..Herself and Kerr have redressed the balance a bit the last few weeks. Actions have more class than words.
oh geez – enough with the mamby-pamby “world citizen” garbage – just say it ! You’re pulling for a Brit to win The Open. This isn’t a world issue – it’s a friggin’ golf tournament. You pull for your futbol team – you pull for your cricket team – you pull for your favorite…whatevers.
This liberal, feel good stuff is SO nausiating.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
You don't get it, Court
We shout “England, England” at national team events. We do not shout “England/UK”
at our individual national players – and I don’t know of any other country which does so either. Whether you like it or not, it doesn’t come across as pride in one’s country as much as a defensive reaction to USA not dominating every sport there is. Why are YOU so defensive?
You know full well that the majority of British fans would have been more thrilled if Tom Watson had won last year’s Open than if it had been a Brit. You know full well that I was pulling for Stewart Cink above all others. I have my money on Westwood this time, but I would be incredibly happy if Jim Furyk won. I just like him. Easing and I are not in a minority who cheer for individual players rather than countries at individual sports.
I rooted for classy Borg each and every time he played
morons McEnroe and Connors.
Me, too
I loved watching McEnroe & Connors too, but was often mortified by their behaviour. I was so sad for Andy Roddick last year (even though I love Federer) & hoped he would be able to give as gracious a winner’s speech this year as the loser’s speech he gave last year at Wimbledon & wrote to him accordingly.
When McEnroe and Borg played, you never heard a peep – Connors didn’t care – he was crude no matter what or where.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
McEnroe definitely curb his behavior with Borg, but I'm sure there was
a peep or two.
Still, controlling himself better when playing one opponent kinda proves he coulda done so all the time, no?
To me, McEnroe and Connors will always be the most obnoxious to ever play the game.
Nastase was an uber jerk too, who thought he was much funnier than he actually was. He did have one classic line when the Cyclops called his serve out and he screamed at it: “That machine knows who I am.”
But you would have cheered even more if Westwood had carried off the Jug.
I know you’re not wrapping the flag around your shoulders before the first tee shot is struck – but you know good and well that your national pride would swell just a little more if one of your own hoists the Jug. Imagine the parties in the streets if McIlroy wins as a Scot.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
McIlroy wins as a Scot?
As nonsensical as your assertion that I would have preferred Westwood to win than Stewart Cink . You’re just plain wrong.
Court, We are proud when a Brit wins
but it’s not the be all and end all. The USA is a very patriotic country, in your face etc and in school you pledge of alligance to the flag every morning. Here we are more laid back about things. We can go next door to Spain or France anytime and laugh with the locals. You, on the other hand, have Mexico, whom you try to keep out, and Canada who you almost ignore. There are a lot of traits our countries share, but in many ways we are different too. Football here is almost tribe like worship. In golf, fans here applaud good golf as well as the home players. The Ryder Cup, great competition that it is, has been spolit a few times with the crazy flag waving from both sides, and is more like a football match. Maybe you should come over and watch the Open and see it for yourself.
"laid back" ???
Hang on – when is the last time you saw a riot at an American sporting event ? You have stadiums designed and redesigned to keep people away from each other and off the field to prevent that kind of thing.
I have no idea what your point about France and Mexico and Canada is. You have all the countries in the UK and Europe…so ? You have to have passports to travel around the same land mass that we have as one country.
We ignore Canada ? That makes no sense. And Mexico…should I assume you’re talking about the illegal immigrant problem that is doing quite a bit to suck our treasury dry by demanding welfare and medical benefits that are supposed to be for citizens ? I suppose the illegals from Eastern Europe that so many Brits go on about isn’t the same thing ? How about Mexico and how it treats illegals ? Jail…beatings…death…and you want to say that the US is the bad guy. That’s gullibility at its finest.
And trust me – if I could, I would be at The Open EVERY year ! Nothing would be more fun…and get me tickets to Wimbledon and The French while you’re at it. :-)
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Like I said...Football here is tribelike worship.
There you go being defensive again..I never said the USA was the bad guys…you just don’t notice much outside your borders, you are so big. And very paranoid. We love you really :) And until you have lived in the USA and Britain as I have, you probably will never see the difference.
Sadly – we don’t have a president who loves you anymore. He removed the bust of Churchill you sent over after 9/11, boxed it up and sent it back. You’ll love this – in place of that gift, he put a framed magazine cover of himself. He’s a disgrace. Instead of the traditional first call to our allies (Britain being first on speed dial), he called several Muslim nations.
Oh – and when something goes wrong pretty much anywhere around the world – guess who is first on the scene to help and which group of citizens sends more money and volunteers more help than any other nation in the world ? We don’t notice much ? Please.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Oh you notice alright
But just bear in mind you (like we do) are protecting your interests…oil and economic influence…you know our governments don’t care about killing people..or our own for that matter…so long as we stay on top of the economic pile. Don’t believe it’s about helping people..
depends on which people you’re talking about killing. (lol)
And if you’re so sure that the UK and US are such evil countries, why aren’t you living in some third world toilet country with a dictator who sends troops to the borders to meet any humanitarian help and confiscates food and medicine for their own purposes ?
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Evil ?
I never said that…one’s got to fight fire with fire. It’s a dog eat dog world mate and lucky for you and me we happen to be in one of the better ones. Just don’t fall for the propaganda that all governments spew out…it’s another weapon of war you know !
I believe you said that our governments don’t care about killing people…or our own for that matter.
Not exactly the people you’d give Nobel Peace Prizes to….oh wait….Barry O got one for being elected a non-caucasian Emperor, didn’t he ? :-D
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Put it this way
Before Vietnam, the press was a government spokesman. When the press filmed the napalm bombs, the Government didn’t want joe public seeing that. Today, it is much harder to hide, but they still try to. If they could, they would nuke the lot of them if it meant removing the threat of the middle east and the innocent are expendable. All countries in power would do the same, not just yours.
The press here still is a government spokesman – but only for one side of the aisle.
“yours” – still funny from the last country claiming to be an empire. :-D
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Easing, my friend, you never seem to hit the reply sign underneath the previous comment,
thus indenting your comment and preventing confusion, perhaps even leading to a melee. You are aware of its existence, no?
I have had a hard day mate..
12 hours of it. Sometimes I just reply…liked your crack about the Brit anyway :)
There's me thinking that was your contribution to the Monday melee!
Remember TXQ’s mantra: “I either win or I protest”.
My contribution: When has anyone ever heard a chant of “Ingerland, Ingerland” at a golf tournament?
I would
For Karen Stupples.
"(I)f you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinsky
I'm glad the American Ladies
have stepped up in a big way. It’s game on now!
"The game is swell when it's played well."
by Fairways and Grins on Jul 12, 2010 9:09 PM EDT reply actions

by 













