What Got Me Into Golf in the First Place
Every golfer has their story of how they came to play the game. When I was twelve or fourteen, or whatever age made me the youngest person in 99% of golf groups, older folks would always tell me, "I wish I took up the game when I was your age." After a while, it turned into a cliche for me or any other young person to hear that from an elder.
"When I was your age, we golfed with shoddy wood and screws in our clubs!"
Honestly, I didn't appreciate the cliche until I aged a bit. As I began writing about golf in college and up through today (bordering on nine years now), I grew interested in golf participation. Why in the world would people play golf? Hittin' a goofy dimpled white ball through the woods, getting mad, and paying a lot of money to do it seems kind of ridiculous on the surface. And that's just for older people.
Imagine inviting (or forcing) your child to play golf. They can't hit the ball far. It's a long way for them to walk - like Disney World, but no Dumbo ride. It just sounds like the whole thing is a drag compared to football where you get to hit people, baseball where you get to hit something, or soccer, whose appeal still is foreign to me because watching children play soccer is like watching ants chase picnic scraps.
That's where the Wall St. Journal's piece on the decline of participation in junior golf enters. Matthew Futterman does a great job in summarizing the conflicting data from the golf industry that shows more kids are participating in formal programs, but not playing the actual game of golf. The evidence seems to suggest that, like for adults, the game is too daunting, too expensive, and too time-consuming for juniors to drop their cell phones and stop texting. When the world is moving so quickly, golf seems even slower to kids.
The resources also appear to be dwindling (or in some parts of the US, nonexistent) to encourage kids to play. There are fewer par 3 courses than a decade ago. Executive, or shorter, courses are closing at a rate outpacing their longer counterparts. The places that kids and families can go to learn the sport - together or separate - are disappearing.
Just as in any sport or activity, infrastructure is required to be able to support its growth. Golf is unlike other sports because it often commands fairly sprawling land needs. Nevermind the cost of maintaining that land or the equipment, golf courses are like mini-parks. Thanks to the housing boom and other land needs, kid-friendly golf courses are not exactly a priority.
For me, though, it was that type of environment that inspired me to play golf in the first place.
I started hitting golf balls at the driving range when I was 12 or so. I did it because it was something else to do after going to the adjoining batting cages. Golf balls went further, especially since I sucked at baseball, so I naturally became interested in learning more about golf. I took four 30 minute lessons to learn the basic principles. After that, I bought a starter set and learned how to hit each club. Sure, I still split time at the batting cage, but I quickly realized that I was better at hitting golf balls than baseballs. That in mind, I had never been on a golf course. How would I pull off that transition?
Fortunately, my dad knew a guy by the name of Chuck Slater. Chuck ran a golf program through the Optimist organization. Each week, we could go to the driving range and rattle hundreds of golf balls with our tireless, youthful bodies for a handful of dollars. A PGA pro was even there to help us out. This wasn't a fancy-schmancy driving range. It was right by BWI Airport, so the fun game was to try to hit a golf ball high enough to collide with a landing plane. (Really, it was impossible. And in a post-9/11 world, I may have been taken to a secret CIA prison camp for questioning had I been caught.) Then, on alternating weeks, we could go to a local pitch-and-putt to hone in on playing a real course for nine holes. It wasn't anything special, but the holes were 100 yards or so and taught the basics. (Actually, I could use a couple of par 3 track rounds right now because my wedge game is in shambles.)
As our group grew and many players improved, the Optimists worked out a deal to go play Carroll Park - a then twelve hole executive track just barely into Baltimore city. Despite the fact that shady men tried to launch drives onto I-95 South from the practice green for money and children stole your golf ball on one hole and tried to resell it to you two holes later, Carroll Park was a great place to learn. It was helpful to have an easy course to learn course management skills. Over time, some of us Carroll Park-ers graduated to the courses at Ft. George G. Meade. From start to end, the Optimists supplied an infrastructure for kids to learn golf at very reasonable prices.
Interspersed in there was also the support of my family. They drove me to the range. They drove me to Carroll Park, or junior tournaments elsewhere. When I arrived at these cheaply-priced tournaments on superb courses in our area, so many of the kids were from rich families with country club memberships. My cousin used to play tournaments with me, and was once asked at an event which country club he belonged. He said the name of his suburban housing development just to have an answer.
My dad would arrange for me to play with his friends and our family that was older but played. That's where the cliches started. After all, I had finally progressed to the point where I could beat some of them. Had they started young like me, they could have been gambling for more money on the course.
The ultimate gift was an arrangement with a local course called Bay Hills. (Not Bay Hill, though interestingly enough, Arnold Palmer's management company bought Bay Hills.) The deal was that for a couple hundred bucks' initiation fee, I could play unlimited golf for like $10 per round. It was unreal. And back then, I could play 36 holes without thinking twice. A bunch of us would go out in the morning, blitz the course twice, and eat a hot dog before going home. What a bargain. I wish I could do that today - be unemployed, play golf, and eat hot dogs all day.
The moral of the story is that I grew to love golf because there were opportunities made available by organizations and people that wanted to pass down golf through to the next generation. I had (and have) loving parents who made sure that they could accommodate my fledgling interest that turned into a passion. They never pushed, but merely propped up in a way that was encouraging of my goals. The combination is what golf needs: infrastructure by which kids can gain access to modest but good facilities, and people - especially parents - that are willing to commit to helping children learn a game for a lifetime.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He's seen the film "Wedding Crashers."
Tough to imagine what a disaster “Wedding WR Commenter Crashers” would be.
I started caddying just to pay my way thru high school and college. No interest in
the game then. About 20 minutes later caddying got me into playing. I’d bet a sizable number of golfers, amateur and pro, began that way.
I can’t believe how much caddies make these days for a foursome, carrying two bags and holding putters for two on the cart — $80 a round. I used to make $30.
it is interesting you mention caddying
I’m different in that I started playing before I started caddying, but I actually feel that the current caddie system is hindering the development of the game. Back in the day many courses had local kids caddie for an amount that didn’t cost an arm and a leg. Currently, the only courses that have caddies are typically ultra private clubs or ultra expensive resorts. As I progressed in the business I actually became a caddie master for a spell and it is amazing how these adults would scoff at any kid trying to caddie. They were all worried that the members would pay the kid less and like him more. I worked at three clubs that all had caddies and it was basically expected that caddies would get $100 a bag. Part of it was the members trying to show off, but caddies would come complaining to me if they “got” stiffed to the tune of $160 for 4 hours work.
If we could find a way to get more working class clubs to begin programs that had strictly kids as caddies on the weekends and during the summer we might see more youngsters get involved. The barrier there is that clubs/pros won’t want to give up the cart revenue. Anyway, the cart/expensive caddie culture in the game will end up biting it in the end.
I can’t see why a kid would decide to pick up golf out of the blue. It is a boring, time consuming and ultra frustrating game. But, get them making some money on a golf course and the appeal starts to show. Members might donate old clubs and the kid will start to get interested in playing on his own. “Forcing” a kid (or an adult) to play golf is bound to be disasterous.
And without caddies on woodsy courses there must be tons of
lost balls.
Anyway, long but interesting comment,Kvn.
TX...that's the tip
of the bag so to speak…At the real HIGN END resort courses, that’s the going rate…not only that, but your expected to tip on top of that….Than, here’s the kicker….YOU HAVE TO TAKE 1 FORECADDY FOR EACH 2 SOME….All this on top of the 300-400 it costs for the round of gold….neat hgh?….STUB
I didn't know such a thing exists?
If we could find a way to get more working class clubs
Placebos, of course, are things you have to swallow even though they contain nothing that actually helps you. It's like American health insurance in a pill. -BiPM
You’d be surprised. My future father-in-law belongs to an Elks club in PA and a lot of similar clubs exist for middle class folks. I would even argue that the club I played in high school and OEG used to belong to is a middle class club as well.
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroom, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on May 18, 2010 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions
.TX you were a rich man
When I started to loop, we made 25 cents a bag…If you were real, and I mean REAL good, you maybe got a nickle or dime tip….My first day, I carried 2 doubles and made 50 cents in tips on top of that….When I got home and gave the money to my mother, she wanted to know what I had done wrong….took a WHOLE LOT SPLANENING to convince her….Ahh but those were the days…..STUB
yup
I mentioned the cart revenue….though the comment was pretty long and probably put most people to sleep!
I’m talking about low end clubs though, some of which don’t have much going in the way of carts. Growing up I knew of clubs that didn’t have enough carts to meet the demands. I also think as the golf population continues to age more and more people will be forced to play with carts, so the revenue hit won’t be as bad. I know plenty of golfers who at least lie to themselves and claim that they would rather walk. I grew up walking 36 holes every day as a kid (often after caddying at the other club) and even I am more than happy to hop on a cart these days.
Caddying
I also caddied for about 5 years on a regular basis and eventually was Caddy Master at my local club. We went by a grading scale of Honor, A, B, and C caddies with Honor caddies making a minimum of $50 a round.
I still caddy for a few players on occasion, mainly for local tournaments and qualifiers, and ask for nothing less than $100 a loop. However, I have also been doing it for much longer than most kids at a golf course who can bring in much more than that with very little experience.
In all reality, the golfers paying huge amounts to these kids are what make the caddy industry so off-putting to other golfers.
Adam Fonseca
by Adam Fonseca on May 18, 2010 9:49 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
I caddied as well when I was 12-16 y/o
We also had a similar grading system C, B A and AA , It was 1969 to 1972 . C caddies at the time got 1.75 for 9 holes. The most one could make at that time is if you were a AA Caddy and carried doubles on the weekend you would get $9.00 per bag plus tip which was usually about 3 to 4 bucks per player if you were lucky. I had a 4 mile ride home on my bike and usually spent half of it on the way home. lol
Today, we have a few caddies at Sawgrass and not kids either. I agree that courses should start caddy programs again. It’s how I learned the game as we got to use the course on Mondays.
"pain is only weakness leaving the body"
My Beef With the WSJ Conclusion
It’s not just the WSJ, but it seems to be pervasive by a lot of people in all sports. And that’s the idea that golfers need to be grown from childhood. That’s really only true for tour pros. All these numbers show is that these programs might help kids in a number of ways, but that they don’t really matter much in growing the game. That doesn’t mean that we’re lacking a good solution because, to me, there isn’t a problem.
I personally took up the game when I was about 18. My brother started playing, probably in his early 20’s. A few of my best friends picked it up around the same age range. In fact, I don’t personally know a whole lot of people that took up the game during childhood.
At the same time, if you want to know how junior golf is doing, stop by my course on weekday afternoons when the high school teams are having matches. Or come by on evenings and weekends when those kids are working their tails off to get better.
There are a myriad of reasons why more kids don’t take to the game and many have been mentioned above. There’s the cost. There’s the time investment that it takes (kids are prone to hang out with friends, play lots of different sports, etc.). And, let’s face it, golf courses are centered toward adults (kids can’t take carts, but many also don’t allow walking during peak hours).
I know I’m a broken record on this, but golf is contracting partly because of the unnatural Tiger explosion over a decade ago. That’s for all ages, not just kids, and to me, it was entirely expected. Then, there’s the current economy.
My basic point is, we’re looking for a solution to a problem which, in my opinion, isn’t a problem. Golfers don’t need to be raised from childhood. It’s perfectly fine if they are, but it’s not the cause for the contraction in golf. Golf grew by leaps and bounds way before there was a First Tee and way before there were tons of junior clinics and the like all over the place. It’s great to make the game accessible to juniors, but the “We have to doooooooooooo something!” panic is really kind of pointless fear that the game is going to evaporate. It’s not going anywhere.
I think my concern goes along the lines of “preserving what I had.” You know, baseball fields, tennis courts, etc, are closing. In their place are soccer fields, skate parks – the stuff that I didn’t care about when I was younger. I think I feel the same about golf courses.
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroom, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on May 18, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I definitely feel you there
The course I cut my teeth on closed down a couple of years ago because the owner sucked it dry and ran it into the ground. My backup driving range closed down over the winter (I suspect the same issue because the thing always had a lot of people out there at any one time).
I don’t disagree that opportunities are disappearing to an extent. I’m just chalking it up to the contraction. It’s definitely sad to see, but in the end, the golf business will be more healthy after a somewhat painful period.
We should all do our part and make golf as accessible to people (kids and adults) as possible, but we also shouldn’t fret too much if it seems like we’re not making the headway that we would like.
by Double Eagle on May 18, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions
finally, someone comes to my defense
Thanks, Mike! I’ve been saying essentially the same thing around here for a couple of years. All I ever heard back was, “Golf is DYING, the sky is FALLING!”
Those screaming the loudest have the biggest bullhorn, the golf equipment manufacturers. They’ve spent lots of money developing and advertising new products that no one is buying. I have no studies to back this up, but golf participation increases somewhere after employment, i.e., the economy improves, employment recovers, then as disposable income grows, the number of rounds played per year and dollars spent on equipment both increase.
The sport has survived 400 years — through famines, droughts, wars, depressions and everything else humans feel compelled to do to each other. It will survive another 400, or 4,000.
Placebos, of course, are things you have to swallow even though they contain nothing that actually helps you. It's like American health insurance in a pill. -BiPM
I think that about says it all…and just to follow on that timeline, St Andrews would have built the Olde Course almost 300 years before the game caught on for it to only be 400 years old. Now that’s patience ! ;-) (j/k D !!)
Speaking of caddying, D, are you going to work the Future’s Tour event up your way in a few weeks ?
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
walking scorekeeper
and I’ve finally saved up enough pennies to play in the pro-am.
Placebos, of course, are things you have to swallow even though they contain nothing that actually helps you. It's like American health insurance in a pill. -BiPM
NICE ! You’ll have a ball at the pro-am…just don’t outdrive your pro by too much – it messes up their confidence for the week. :-)
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
if I could add 50 yards I might almost be competitive. Almost…
Placebos, of course, are things you have to swallow even though they contain nothing that actually helps you. It's like American health insurance in a pill. -BiPM
You're competitive in the field of
commenting, which is way more important.
Well said, Diane. I'd venture to add that even if the sky were falling,
the courses would still be crowded. It’s not like it’s lightning, ya know?
You’re absolutely right, Diane. And I completely agree that a lot of the crying comes from the industry looking to self-sustain. There’s an inherent correction needed from the Tiger/real estate boom that has since settled back down to a more modest number.
For my selfish reason, though, I wish there were more pitch n’ putts, executive course and the like. I just wish golf cost less and, by extension, that more people could take up the game if they wanted.
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroom, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on May 18, 2010 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions
oh sure – now you’re going to agree with MY usual stance and suck up to D ?? (lol)
next trip to Atlanta – bring your OLD old blades and we’ll go play a couple of fun short tracks.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Can I play too court,
I have my blades from 1985 and I love em.
"pain is only weakness leaving the body"
bring ’em on ! unfortunately, my ancient set of blades got “borrowed” and never returned. great set of Ram Tour Grinds.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
I have Wilson Staff G-17's
Hale Irwin palyed with them for years.
"pain is only weakness leaving the body"
I knew I was in good company
The funny thing is, who are the equipment manufacturers trying to whip up? Us, I guess?
All the “game is dying” stuff is like preaching to the choir. They’re not really reaching people outside the game. I guess that’s what they’re trying to enlist us to do.
Let’s increase that revenue base introduce kids to the game!
by Double Eagle on May 18, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
WSJ Article...
The WSJ article stirred a heated debate between me (golf fan and new golf blogger) and a some of friends on facebook who AREN’T golfers. They offered their reasons for not taking up the sport and, in some cases, why they passionately disliked it. One issue that came up – one that hasn’t been mentioned yet here and people seem to forget – is the country club image.
When Billy Payne scolds Tiger for the way he treated women and then refuses to allow women membership at Augusta, it isn’t the warmest welcome to the game’s outsiders. I’m a huge golf fan, but I’ll be lucky if I ever get to Augusta, much less play it. I find that sad. Baseball fans can realistically go to Yankee Stadium. Let’s be honest, the exclusivity and private clubs aren’t the best branding for the sport and it sure hasn’t bred diversity on the Tour.
The PGA Tour contributes more $s to charity than any other sport, but once they write the check, it appears as though its back to the private club for scotch and cigars to pat each other on the back for being so charitable. I think they need to be visibly more hands on, fostering the development of muni programs, exec courses, and exposure to the game to less fortunate demographics. And Joe Switzer (from the article) lobbying schools to fork over $5,000 to golf programs while these very educational systems are firing teachers in over crowded classrooms amid budget cuts? He could definitely use some PR advice.
Sometimes I have nightmares; and they all involve not having the internet.
If you're not interested in playing - just say so - don't be an idiot or a hypocrite
Ok – so complainer #1 is an idiot – perhaps you should point out that most golf courses aren’t country clubs.
- is just about as brain dead – trying to connect Tiger cheating on his wife to a club that has the members it wants is…idiotic. Tell him that next time he wants to go out with the guys, you’re going to send a bunch of strange, pushy women along – MAYBE he’ll get the point. There are thousands of women’s groups that are exclusively women.
Country Clubs are not “branding” – that’s a really dumb ideal Golf is the game – not the surroundings. (that word “branding” drives me nuts)
Sorry – #3 is a hypocrite. When he writes a check to a charity, does he go out to said charity and bring someone home with him ? I’m guessing not.
The PGA Tour doesn’t retreat to a country club – they finish in one place and move on to the next….46 weeks of the year, plus a few more for “silly season”.
As far as Joe Switzer is concerned – he’s just and object lesson for our modern government. He tried to get the government to use force to get other people to pay for what he wanted.
How’s that ?
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Relax, courtgolf....Don't kill the messenger, here.
You’re preaching to the choir, courtgolf. I agree with everything (mostly everything) you’re saying, but the fact remains there’s a lot of people outside the game that are turned off by some components of the Tour’s image (not branding :-)). They are clearly naive on a number of accounts and I fought the good fight, fo sho. But some are still turned off. It has this reputation (perhaps unjustly) whether we like it or not. I think people could care less if a club in Georgia chooses its member, but you can’t tell me that having most of the Tour’s biggest tournaments (the one’s people watch) at exclusive clubs doesn’t turn people away from the game.
I know that most golf courses aren’t CCs. The PGA Tour goes from town to town 46 weeks out of the year, leaving those communities in better shape than they were before. No sport comes close to doing anything like that. It’s awesome. The only thing is, they play golf at a course that few in the community will ever get a chance to play on and when a kid sees Tim Clark, Rory McIlroy, or whoever win on Sunday asks his dad to go play that course, his dad has to tell him he can’t….cause he’s not a member. I hate that as a golf fan. It makes me feel like shit that the sport I love can appear so exclusive. I want to change that.
I dunno….Maybe I’m just jealous. I see all these beautiful courses out there that I’ll never get to play.
Good Talk :-p
Good Talk
Sometimes I have nightmares; and they all involve not having the internet.
I followed golf from my teens...
but I had no money at home then so never contemplated playing the game. When I returned to England, I played Rugby, so didn’t take up the golf until I was 33. When I did, I found my brother, who was never as good at sports as me, hit the ball miles past me ! What a shock…it took me 3 years to get better than him, just wish I took the game up in my teens, but there you go. I’m hooked for life anyway.
Doesn’t that drive you nuts ? We had a kid from Georgia Tech in studio. He was about 5’11" tall and looke like he weighed under 150 pounds – and he drives the ball over 300 yards. I outweigh him by 75 pounds and have a lot more muscle but can’t get near 300 yards.
I asked him how that happens – he explained it’s a LOFT problem….Lack of F’ing Talent. (wiseass kid) (lol)
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
I'll remember that one court,
I’ll use it when some of my higher handicap mates have a go at me, lol
Wall Street Journal Article
The PGA of America applauds the Wall Street Journal for recognizing the importance of growing junior golf for the long term vitality of our sport.
Our 28,000 PGA Professionals understand that kids are our future. In 2009, our course operations survey showed that 72% of PGA-staffed facilities hosted junior camps and 77% offered junior instruction, both increases over 2008. Our Play Golf America Family Golf Month in July hosted a record 98,550 family members. Our database of courses offering low cost access ($20 or less) to juniors, available at www.PlayGolfAmerica.com, grew to a record 1,002 last year. And, we’re expanding our junior golf programming in 2010 in a partnership with the USGA, the rollout of junior course access programs and the expansion of the PGA Family Course Program through an alliance with the NRPA.
Golf is an incredible sport for all ages with incredible benefits by allowing families and friends to spend quality time together, enjoy beautiful scenery and fresh air, all while getting a healthy dose of exercise. Please click on the link below for recent reports from PGA Sections across the country on their success in growing junior participation:
http://images.pgalinks.com/vmc/pressReleases/Junior Golf Sections and Fact Sheet.pdf
Jim Remy,
PGA President
by ThePGAofAmerica on May 20, 2010 10:03 AM EDT reply actions
Why does the PGA of America need confirmation from the Wall Street Journal ? Shouldn’t they know the importance of junior programs without a newspaper telling them ? Is this news ? Do they think that a WSJ article is going to all of a sudden wake up all their pros to the need to introduce kids to the game ? Even if they know that golf is not generally a game that appeals to masses of kids ?
"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by 










