The OWGR Top 10 Reflects an Era Gone By & Golf's Future
Nearly two months into 2010, we currently have a rather diverse top ten in the Official World Golf Rankings. Figured it was worth it to spend a few lines looking at the top ten, their makeup, and how they got here.

For one thing, there are officially more Europeans in the top ten of the OWGR than every other continent combined. No Australians. No (South) Africans. No one from Asia.
That's very retro for a game that has been exhibiting signs of multinationalism for some time. Two of the reigning major champions are from South America and Asia. Winners come from six continents now - still waiting for that penguin champion from Antarctica - but a whole lot of Caucasian in the top ten.
About half of the top ten is there today because of an outstanding beginning to the season. Case and point, Ian Poulter has earned almost 80 more points than he has last so far over the roving 104 week measuring period. By the same token, Martin Kaymer, Paul Casey and Steve Stricker have had serious point gains.
Conversely, players that earned their high standing throughout 2009 are hanging onto their points despite less than optimal starts to 2010. Rory McIlroy has played well in '10 despite a back injury, but has barely recouped enough points to counterbalance what he has lost so far this season. Paddy Harrington is slipping behind quickly, as is Jim Furyk, whose Chevron World Challenge in December is the only reason he is in the top ten right now.
Perhaps the most interesting comparison among guys not named after an animal is the debate between Steve Stricker and Phil Mickelson as to who is the real de facto world number one while Tiger Woods is away from the game. The numbers clearly show that it is Stricker who is surging.
Despite Stricker and Poulter charging hard to start the season, though, neither player has earned as many points as Tiger Woods has lost this season. In spite of that kind of tumble, Woods still holds a four point advantage over Stricker.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hmm – I’m counting a total of two continents represented – Europe and North America. (how does THIS sound ? Tiger defects to Antarctica for tax purposes…plus Elin misses the Swedish winters and becomes the first ever Antarctican citizen to win on the PGA Tour and a major ?) :-D
There are FIVE players in the top 10 not part of the British Commonwealth – (4) Americans and Kaymer from Germany. (I’m giving you 3 weeks of remedial “Are you smarter than a 5th grader” rerun studies for that one)
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Actually, the British Commonwealth is classically defined as any country/territory that was once ruled by the Brits.
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Feb 24, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
you left out a pretty important part of the definition -
“British Commonwealth – an association of nations consisting of the United Kingdom and several former British colonies that are now sovereign states but still pay allegiance to the British Crown” We don’t pay allegiance to the Crown.
(4) Americans, (3) Brits, (2) Irish, and (1) German – Kaymer is the only player who doesn’t list English as his native tongue. This “diversity” thing…I’m not seeing it.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
But, for the sake of this discussion, I’ll just change that cause I really don’t want that to be the point of this thread. :)
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Feb 24, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions
According to Tigers website
he entered 27 tounaments worldwide from January 2008. If 40 tournaments is the minimum for world ranking points in the last 2 years, should he not be wiped from the list ? If not, and he dosen’t play this year i can’t see him on a list at all. I might be way off base here, someone please explain it to me.
Taking numbers like this for Tiger in the last 2 years doesn’t really fit since he spent a good bit of ‘08 and ’09 on the DL. In ’08, he only got in 6 starts. He usually plays about 18 PGA Tour events, and most years he plays a few international events like Australia and China last year, or Dubai. Getting 40 worldwide starts isn’t too difficult.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
I understand that, court
but what happens if a player gets in just 27 ? Does he fall short of the criteria ? Does the system take into account injury ?

by 
















