A Few Tips for 2010 for Golf Journos Turned Bloggers from a Blogger
If you were to talk to any reporter in the golf world and ask for their candid assessment of the golf journalism game, the answers would be grim. For all of the excitement around evolving technologies and content delivery methods, the reality is that there are fewer writers in the game with full-time gigs than there have been in decades. The decline of printed media, the consolidation of media outlets, and - most recently - a very down economy have contributed to a disheartening number of pink slips for the journos of our game.
For the most part, these writers are still hoping to work at their craft and do so in the sport. While a select few are able to negotiate new gigs - either part-time or full-time - most are left with few options. An increasinly popular trend among this collection of writers is to start their own website. Effectively, they're trying to create their own media outlet in much the same vein as a blog.
They'll tell you that they aren't bloggers, they're journalists goshdarnit. For all intents and purposes, though, they're writers. I feel that bloggers can really impart some wisdom on this crop of writers in helping them do what most independent sites are unable to do - make money. If you'll allow me, I'll dispense that advice after the jump. (And I hope you will add to it in the comments section.)
Post often. So far, it seems like most are delivering content as though they're still writing for a newspaper or magazine. A few times per week at most, new content is out the door at these sites. Research and my own experience suggest that frequent solid posting is the best method to build a brand and a following. On average, Waggle Room produces anywhere between 20 and 30 posts per week. 80% of those come from me. Put out articles, videos, photos, and link dumps, and often. People need a reason to come back everyday.
Be bold. It seems like a rudimentary point to make, but many a writer are not willing to take risks, do serious research, or engage in a little muckraking. A name is established when a site has something that no other site has. In Waggle Room, I hope that people see a wide variety of topics, forms of reporting, and stuff that cannot be found elsewhere. With an engaging, unique mix, a person-driven website can succeed.
(To that same end, bloggers should be willing to take chances. Apply for that credential. Email that rep. Don't be afraid to stick your neck out and your chest at the same time. With a polite ask and professionalism, it is surprising what can be accomplished.)
Have the quadruple threat. Print is just one weapon in the holster for content authors. Employing other methods and integrating them all on a regular basis makes a site way more compelling. At a single-person site, visitors can get bored with predictable writing topics and styles. But, using other media types can bring a variety that most visitors crave - and it can often be a lot easier to create a slideshow or webcam video than typing out a long essay.
Don't be afraid of newfangled technology. As a correlary to the prior point, it is a great idea to take some chances with new technology. Great services that supplement content already exist and new ones are coming everyday. Check 'em out when you hear about them. Somehow, someday, that service may prove very useful and adaptable for golf. Hopefully with some help from the professional tours, I can better demonstrate what I mean in the next few weeks.
Finally - and maybe most important - interact with your fans & critics, especially your critics. The one thing that is most critical to the success of Waggle Room (or any site) is the community of people that read it. Whether it be agreement or a strong rebuttal, the responses to my work are great conversation starters. It gives readers a reason to come back on top of the content, particularly when the lead author talks back. New readers to Waggle Room consistently laud the site because of the community that includes the primary author. It is not only the job of the author to start the conversation, but it is also their job to participate in it as well.
The suggestions that I made were not with the intent of trying to boast. Rather, it is an attempt to lend a helping hand. It strikes me that it must be a difficult transition moving from having a staff of people to produce, promote, and pretty up content to being forced to do it all yourself. Hopefully some of these tips can help get these new sites going and sustain them in a way that everyone wins.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Writers and Bloggers
You’re right Ryan. I see more and more “writers” using their own blogs. Maybe they have seen the light. I know the blogging community will be more accepting of these "writers’ than they were of us bloggers.
Ok, you guys.....
help me out here. So, this web site is a golf ‘BLOG’, and Ryan is the Blogger??? And we that post comments are what? Bloggettes??? I need to know the “official” terminology so as to not offend “empty” Jempty, and ole One Eye. Any other official blog do’s and don’ts would be appreciated.
The Saints are in the SUPER BOWL....WHO DAT!
em
I am a blogger at Me and Old Man Par.
I am a commenter here, save for the rare times I post what Ryan calls a FanPost.
Bingo. Em, when you post FanPost/Shots, you’re a blogger (or if you start your own site).
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Jan 29, 2010 11:01 AM EST up reply actions
My mother had a saying:
“It’s baloney no matter how you slice it.”
Ryan, I'd add one extra thought...
Stay on point. By that, I mean choose an angle, a viewpoint, a gimmick — whatever you want to call it — and stick with it. You can do a variety of things on your blog, but you want to keep that focus so people know what to expect.
For example, my blog focuses on helping weekend players play better. Most of the time I do just that and post instructional material. But I left myself some wiggle room (no pun intended) for variety while still keeping at least a tenuous tie to my focus. I had only two posts about the Tiger fiasco — but I focused on how it might affect the play on Tour, and what weekend players could learn from that. I’ve posted cartoons from YouTube, but they were topical and related to other posts I was doing at the time. Occasionally I post news about the Tours, but it’s generally related to players I’ve been using as examples
The only “unrelated” thing I do is the Limerick Summary every Monday, of the previous week’s Tour event… but it’s a regular feature that people expect and seem to enjoy.
The thing is, readers know what to expect from my site and I try not to let them down. With millions of blogs on the ’Net, I think that identity may be just as important as useful, regular content.
Mike Southern
www.ruthlessgolf.com
Good, interesting post, Ryan. I’m curious: Have you ever worked in the print media before? I ask because it might affect my reading of the above—not positively or negatively (I actually know that in advance of asking the question) but rather just as a means of better understanding where you’re coming from here.
Tom, haven’t worked in print media before except for a few freelance gigs – so that definitely has a big impact on my perspective being a “Web guy.”
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Jan 29, 2010 1:31 PM EST up reply actions
And that’s cool. There’s a lot to be learned from “digital natives” like yourself. I’m only 34, but I spent 2000-2008 working in print. Being just a few years older than you wound up making a huge difference in the medium through which I gained professional experience.
Having worked in both arenas now, I can say that the two are absolutely night and day. I know you were turned off a bit by the slogan for the “A Position”, but those guys spent 20, 30 years working in print. The slogan sounds reactionary, but I understand it. That’s the better part of a career, and I can’t stress enough how the medium of your work shapes you over time. Part of being a print journalist was feeling like you were a part of an entire machine—photo, art, fact-check, copy-edit, managing editor breathing down your neck. Along with being a means for producing work that put a premium on accuracy and finality, this machine had a tremendous social and collaborative component to it. Suddenly, along with your morning commute that entire infrastructure is gone. You find yourself looking at a wordpress window, deleting spam from Russia, and there’s no one at the water cooler to talk about the weekend sporting events. In fact, there’s no water cooler at all. This is not an easy transition to make!
The thing that I find most interesting about your boldface points, Ryan, is that they operate on a set of assumptions about the Internet that some might not necessarily agree with…even if you happen to be right. Should you post frequently even if it dilutes the quality of your message? There are a lot of ways to drive traffic that involve playing a game with a set of rules that you may never have agreed to. I sometimes feel that way, and I’m sure I’m not alone in saying that among people who have worked in print, or even career bloggers, for that matter. You can adapt to a new medium without abandoning the things that you valued from the old, as long as you develop your own goals for what you hope to gain from a web presence.
I don't have all the publishing experience you do, TD...
But at 51 I’m used to print, too. I didn’t start learning to blog until early 2009, and trying to learn that plus Twitter and Facebook is a challenge. One thing I’ve learned is that you’re right, there are a lot of ways to drive traffic… but you’re also right that we play by a set of rules we didn’t necessarily agree to. The trick is learning how to play the rules while not “diluting your message.”
As for posting frequently, there’s nothing that says you have to post ground-breaking material everyday. You might try writing a column once or twice a week (on specific days, so your readers know when to look for them), then fill the other days with support material. Think of short filler material that a magazine uses to flesh out the otherwise empty space around the features. But the search engines are looking for frequent posts on a blog, and doing so helps get the key material listed quicker and with higher rankings.
In Ryan’s case, he opens his blog up to us as guest posters, in addition to his own writing, almost like a print magazine… except that the articles come out a few at a time, each day. That’s part of his blog’s identity. You just have to think a little differently with digital media.
Mike Southern
www.ruthlessgolf.com
by Ruthless Mike on Jan 29, 2010 6:14 PM EST up reply actions
That’s a really good point, Tom. The point you make about being a part of a machine is something I’ve noticed in my dayjob. Our IT shop is small, so a person like myself has to play multiple (or sometimes all) roles in the process. In a larger shop, I would play a very specific role – like what you described. In the case of journalists starting their own sites, they go from small group to individual. Makes it very difficult!
I don’t necessarily except everyone to agree with the same set of suggestions/presumptions I make. There are plenty of success stories of sites that don’t post very often at all. I suppose my theory is that you can post in a high quality and (relatively) high quality. In a fantastic 1000 word print essay, a writer could derive 3 or 4 really good short posts. Or a writer could make one really good observation in a post and then not necessarily worry about filling in all of the gaps. But that’s a specific bullet point.
The thing I like most about what you said – and actually should be a bullet point – is setting a real goal. I approached it from the perspective of trying to make a site profitable through advertising, so as to sustain a full-time gig doing it. But, I would guess for some that is not the goal. And, in that case, I would probably drop one or two of my suggestions and replace them with completely different things.
The one thing that I have noticed so far is that most of the new one person sites have done a pretty solid job in presenting unique content. Your site’s a good example of that.
Not to be an inquisitor – and you don’t have to answer if you don’t want to – but what would you say your goals are for Out and Back?
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Jan 29, 2010 7:29 PM EST up reply actions
Ryan,
This might be a dud answer, but at the moment my major goal is just to be flexible. My life is changing pretty rapidly these days—my wife and I’ll be watching March Madness with a screaming infant, put it that way—so o&b is going to be low on my list of priorities. For a while. Again.
I’m cool with this, but I wasn’t always. There are certain decisions that I made when I site started a year ago that I’d reconsider today. One thing that’s interesting is that you referred to it as a one-person site. That’s fairly true, but it’s a prime example of a goal that I haven’t reached. From the beginning I’ve wanted to get others involved, and a few handfuls of people have come on board with some excellent contributions. I’m hoping to do more of that in the future. I’d like to build a community, even a small one—that’s another long-term goal. It’s one of the things that impresses me about WR. I have a couple of huge hurdles to overcome in that area—one of them is design-related (beyond my pay grade, but I’m hoping to have it addressed) and the other is connected to my print-dinosaur attachment to editorial control.
Finding an audience when you’re only marginally interested in the day-to-day workings of the Tours is an interesting challenge. O&B was never meant to knock out ten posts a day on Rachel Uchitel—it is slow-footed by design. This isn’t to say I don’t keep my eye on that stuff—I most certainly do! But I recognize that others have both the skill and inclination to provide that kind of coverage much more effectively than I ever could. What I find heartening is that the comments that come in are often measured responses from people who find the material relevant or are connected to it professionally. O&B’s traffic levels are small, but I find those connections to be much more satisfying than Analytics stats.
So, long answer to a great question. The astute reader will notice that Ryan was following his own advice—interact with your fans and critics! So true.
Just checked out the site, Mike...
Found it interesting, I’ll look again when I have more time, cheers.
Count me in too.
A little Ruthlessness never hurt anybody.
Thanks for the compliment...
I didn’t put the info up to pitch my site, but it’s the only one I can speak for. Business guys like Ryan would probably call it “branding” but whatever you call it, it seems like any blog that rises above the pack does it in one way or another. Just having a well-known name (like some of the journalists) isn’t necessarily enough to get people’s attention.
Well, maybe if you’re Peter Jennings or Ryan Ballengee…
Mike Southern
www.ruthlessgolf.com
by Ruthless Mike on Jan 29, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions

by 










