The Decider: Tiger vs. Phil - Who's Your Boy?
Philly Mick's return to the PGA Tour this week for the first time since the US Open has sparked some heated blogosphere action. Stephanie Wei in unapologetic about her disdain for the People's Champion, referencing both his FIGJAM moniker and his manboobs when talking about him.
Meanwhile, Jeff Skinner tries to play Rodney King in a well written post that poses the question why can't we all just get along about Tiger and Phil. Our friend Bob Smiley has also posed that question in the past at his Foreright Bob blog.
Personally, I like both and have issues with each.
About Tiger, I obviously love his dominance, talent, and the ease with which he knows how to win. He is history in the making and an intense competitor. He also has a poor temper, tries to intimidate his competition (including Phil Mickelson on Sunday at the Masters), and cusses way too much. Woods is also the most boring interview. Thanks, GQ Magazine. I can literally tell you his answers to questions in a press conference before they happen. But, Tiger is highly respected by his peers for his excellence and allowing them to become millionaires by playing mediocre professional golf.
As for Mickelson, he is a risk-taker. He is an underdog that appeases to crowds in a way that Tiger rarely does - except when draining tournament winning putts. He signs autographs for hours after tournaments. Mickelson engages the press in a way that most golfers do not. Lefty also seems to have an obvious intellectual and business curiosity that others lack. For those reasons, I think a lot of players do not like him. He differs from them, and in the process, can make them look kind of lousy. I imagine some players deem that as fake. Maybe it is. And I also cannot seem to get over Phil's alignment with ExxonMobil for that math and science teacher thing. ExxonMobil gives me the creeps.
But, this is The Decider. So my opinion is moot. You tell me: who's your boy? Tiger or Phil? Both? Or Blue?
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
Tiger, no question
The emotion and cussing don’t bother me much so long as he doesn’t direct it at another player, official, or fan. The intimidation is fine, because I like gamesmanship (that stops short of breaches of etiquette, like coughing in someone’s swing). The poor interview I could care less about.
That said, I always root for Phil, too, and am a fan.
by Double Eagle on Aug 6, 2009 12:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m with Eagle – it’s Tiger. While there isn’t a golfer on any professional tour I don’t enjoy watching and can learn from – when I want to see the best, it’s Tiger Woods. Shot-wise, most guys on Tour have the ability to hit the same shots Woods hits – but they can’t/don’t do it under the gun. He is the guy who, when he gets in trouble, you almost expect him to pull off the shot he needs, no matter how unlikely.
Mickelson is a trick shot artist, but when the pressure really gets turned up, he is just as likely to miss as he is to make. IF everything falls into place, he is almost unbeatable – even by Tiger – but he doesn’t seem to have that mental gear that Tiger has – that “refuse to lose” ability to pull off what he needs when he needs it most.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Aug 6, 2009 1:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tiger
I have talked to a few on the Tour who don’t like Phil whatsoever due to his fakeness with the public and private.
Tiger is one of the most well-liked for a reason even excluding his success on the course
by AppleCub on Aug 6, 2009 5:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Phil
I tend to root for the underdog and sympathize with golfers who have had setbacks (i.e. Greg Norman) so I’m a Phil fan. Phil’s aggressive style is appealing, but as we saw in the 2006 U.S. Open that can turn against him. I think Phil’s problem in the clutch, and the reason he doesn’t do as well as Woods, is that he overthinks things, especially around the greens. With some more short putts dropping at Augusta this year, and without the disaster on 12, Phil could have won a third green jacket in one of the most stunning major comebacks of all-time.
I respect Tiger’s ability and his performance under pressure, but I’ve just never been a big fan of his.
Been a Reds fan since 1996 and am desperate for a playoff run.
by Britain United on Aug 6, 2009 8:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Its like picking "who's your favorite child"
I’m new to the Waggle Room here… didn’t know it existed until I did some exploration on SB.
While I’m sure I haven’t been following professional golf nearly as long as those of you…. I have a great deal of admiration and respect for both of them. Both have great competitive spirits, yet both also show their human sides which is really missing from other professional sports these days.
Both great golfers and human beings…. I root for them both, but not before Justin Leonard :)
No further comments on Bruce Wayne.
by Gunslinger20 on Aug 7, 2009 2:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















