YE Yang Was The Only Reason I Didn't Smash My TV In On Sunday
YE Yang was clearly the compelling reason to watch the PGA Championship on Sunday. We didn't know it at the time, but he really was. Had he crumbled early, or Tiger gone out and birdied two of the first four holes, there was a good chance that I would have had to put the TV on mute for the day.
It's not because I don't want to see Tiger win. Rather, it is because CBS' coverage of the PGA Championship was awful. Like Dating in the Dark awful. Like I would rather be forced to watch More to Love a la A Clockwork Orange than deal with that muck again.
The PGA Championship was pimped out by CBS. The leaderboards for the championship were littered with ads for innumerable sponsors. After winning me over with that cute dog commerical, I now don't want to adopt a dog or buy insurance from Travelers. Every replay was sponsored by Cialis or Avodart. I don't have a going problem or a growing problem. I had a TV problem.
The Masters features 56 minutes of golf action each hour. This PGA Championship may have gotten to twenty minutes. Two shots, commerical. One shot, leaderboard, montage sequence, commercial. It was almost unwatchable at times.
Thank God for DirecTV and PGA.com, which were simulcasting unique channels alongside the CBS coverage. They featured more video of the lead pair than CBS did all day. And, I grew to like the team of Brian Katrek and Golf Channel's Michael Breed. I mean, Gary McCord was hacking it up on 16 tower. Why not let these two guys have a shot at it? I can only thank my lucky stars that Verne Lundquist has some kind of magnetizing force for history-altering shots. If McCord got to call Yang's chip in for eagle, it may well have ruined the moment. This was not the Reno-Tahoe Open, fellas.
The CBS crew - usually pretty reliable - seemed to offer little in the way of on-course analysis in the critical moments. It was almost as though they were resting on their laurels in anticipation of a Yang implosion. That kind of malaise may well have cost Tiger Woods his 15th major title and it certainly cost CBS in terms of production value.
A showdown was developing before our very eyes on Sunday afternoon, complete with a lot of gamesmanship. It seemed like CBS was debating whether or not to point it out to the casual fan. Tiger was sensing the win slipping through his fingers and was applying his usual Jedi mind tricks to obfuscate opponents. Nary but a rare mention of it seemed to be made.
The PGA Championship may be the ugly stepsister to the US Open, but it doesn't deserve treatment worse than Cinderella got before the pumpkin turned into a carriage. Despite Johnny Miller, NBC Sports did a superb job with the US Open in the way of coverage and analysis. Never did I think that I would long for the dulcent tones of another Jimmy Roberts essay, but I missed the guy this weekend. (I will never long for one from Rick Reilly at ABC.) Tim Rosaforte offers interesting insight into the innerworkings of these players' lives. That kind of personal touch was missing at Hazeltine.
Instead, we got FedEx Cup standings and more recycled Tiger facts that are more deserving of a packet of instant oatmeal than a major championship. 70 wins. 14 for 14 15. I got it. I have committed it to memory.
Luckily, the action down the stretch spoke way louder than the white noise we were getting from the broadcast crew. The drama of the back nine elevated with each passing shot. No words were necessary to explain the significance of what was developing and ultimately happened. The shotmaking of Yang and the facial expressions of Tiger Woods told the story.
For what it's worth, Jim Nantz's championship pun - "Y! E! S!" - was pretty good considering the surprise of the emerging champion.
The end result, though, may prove that however bad the coverage is that great golf will resound with the public - if Tiger Woods is involved somehow. The ratings for the final round of the PGA Championship were up 150% over last year. It was the highest PGA final round rating since Rich Beem bested Woods on the same track in 2002. The two day average from the weekend tied the '99 event at Medinah - Woods v. El Nino - for the third best ever.
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
oh please – you would have watched the PGA from start to finish on Sunday even if Tiger won by 4-5-6-7-8 shots.
We watch him play because at just about any time, he might do something we’ve never seen before…and, as it turned out, we got that, too.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Aug 18, 2009 11:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think “put the TV on mute” instead of “turn it off” is a better line anyhoo, so I made the change.
You’re right, we got something incredible out of Woods, just in a different way than we expected. Fortunately, that and how Yang played saved that broadcast. Yuck. BTW, I honestly liked Katrek doing TV play by play. Breed even caught on with me after a while, but BK was carrying him.
Email me any comments or questions at ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com.
by Ryan Ballengee on Aug 18, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll let BK know you enjoyed their coverage – they followed Tiger’s group all four days online, plus Phil’s group on Thursday. Granted, it is easier to cover just one group than it is the entire field – which was his self-depricating explanation for why they did so well – but you’re still only covering one shot at a time.
I agree with you – they could set the entire NBC / TNT / ABC / Golf Channel crews on a slow boat to China for all I care and just put these three guys on duty.
By the way – that was Michael Fein’s first broadcasting gig. He did an excellent job as host.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Aug 18, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What they were doing was actually tougher than what Nantz, et al were doing on the broadcast. It is TOUGH to fill air on one group with so much time in between shots. Besides, CBS didn’t show as many golf shots as they normally do. They pretty much whittled it down to Yang/Woods quickly. (Deservedly so.)
Email me any comments or questions at ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com.
by Ryan Ballengee on Aug 18, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What ? You think that carrying on with all that Nantz-babble is easy ? (lol)
Luckily – BK has a brain like a computer. He just pulls up information in a flash – and he’s almost always right with it. It’s pretty amazing for someone just in his 30’s who hasn’t been playing golf all that long. He took up the game while dating his wife to “suck up” to his future father-in-law, then started doing a golf show at 790 the Zone. He’s now a scratch golfer who should be doing golf for some major broadcasting company. (are you listening CBS / NBC / ABC / TNT / Golf Channel ??)
On Saturday, Phil Mickelson was paired with Kevin Na. Breed and Fein didn’t know much about him, so they threw it to BK, and he gave them almost 5 minutes of background on Na along with some pretty good stories – off the top of his head – no preparation time.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Aug 18, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s the kind of guy that you need to have – someone who has a passion for the game and then translated that into broadcasting. Former players can certainly succeed in doing the opposite, but play-by-play guys suffer if their first love was broadcasting and not golf.
Email me any comments or questions at ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com.
by Ryan Ballengee on Aug 18, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't it proper ettiquete
for a player to wait till their playing partner finishes the hole before walking to the next tee. If Tiger had putted out already, I don’t remember a single occasion of him waiting for Yang. The gallery is there for him, as soon as Tiger is on the move, they will move too.
by Bill Jempty on Aug 18, 2009 1:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tiger does not leave the green before the other players have putted out. He may leave before the other guy(s) are heading off – but not before they have finished putting. He learned that lesson early on and is very careful not to get the crowd moving by anything that he does. The gallery moves when Tiger finishes his shot – you can’t get on Tiger for that.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Aug 18, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tiger definitely left the 17th green before Yang was done there.
Email me any comments or questions at ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com.
by Ryan Ballengee on Aug 18, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He did it there
and I am certain on one other hole for sure.
by Bill Jempty on Aug 18, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if he did – it is very unusual. we may get on Tiger for his tantrums after his own shots, but he knows his position with the fans and galleries, and respects the guys he plays with to not be a distraction.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Aug 18, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not to mention
the spotty camera switching issues, lingering on tiger and yang walking up a fairway while the commentary was on an entirely different hole (happened more than once). I kept thinking, “They gotta have one guy whose only job is to watch the broadcast as it appears on TV and scream if anything isn’t working correctly.”
and i do agree, friggin commercials up the yazoo, was almost unbearable – i decided to listen to a ballgame and mute it whenever the commercial tournament took a golf break.
"Have a take and do not suck or you will get run." - Jim Rome
by jonny-yuma on Aug 18, 2009 2:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















