What's Par Got To Do With It (It Being the US Open)?
The Associated Press covered the news yesterday that the USGA is likely to play the 2015 US Open at Chambers Bay with a fluid par. That is, par may be 70 for a couple of days and 71 for the other two.
"One thing I'm absolutely positive we'll do in the future, perhaps in 2015 at Chambers Bay, is play a hole certain days as a par 4, and certain days as a par 5," Davis said in a telephone interview over the weekend.
Davis mentioned the first and 18th holes at Chambers Bay, which he felt could be played as either a par 4 or a par 5.
"We would hate to make a decision one way or another, because they could be such a good par 5, and such a good par 4," he said. "I would hate to give up playing it multiple ways because we have a set par."
In other words, Davis is declaring par meaningless - as he should. Par is just a number. It is a prescription for the golfer to know how many shots it should take to complete a hole. But other than serving as a mere advisory, it has no weight on determining a tournament winner. The winner is the player that finishes 72 holes in the lowest number of shots. How many under or over par is kind of meaningless. Paul Goydos agrees:
"Par is just a number," Paul Goydos said with a shrug when told of the concept. "All you care about is the total score. What wins is 277, not 3 under or 5 under."
This is nothing new in golf. Several years ago, the Arnold Palmer Invitational changed the par at Bay Hill from 72 down to 70. The change was made then because of the perception that players were lighting up Bay Hill in relationship to par by finishing in the minus teens to win.
The same thing holds true here - it is about perception to both the fan and the player. For the fan, changing par will make it obvious that the hole is clearing playing in a very different fashion. To the player, par helps frame how the hole can be played despite it not really meaning anything. Davis is hypothesizing that changing par on the same hole may make a player be more or less aggressive. Perhaps that is true, but it turns out really to just be a mind game.
And for that reason, I'm a big Mike Davis fan.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
It’s a little off the beaten path, but it really doesn’t matter what they call the holes on any particular day – UNLESS – the green is built for a par 5 or a par 4. Traditionally, par 5 greens are larger than par 4 greens because they, potentially, have to receive balls from much further out than a par 4. This is the problem I have with the PGA Tour and the USGA playing a par 5 as a long par 4.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Jul 8, 2009 12:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Little known fact – that is how Tina Turner originally wanted to do “What’s Love Got to Do With It” on the album
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Jul 8, 2009 12:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You Should Play My Home Course, Court
Tom Kite and Bob Cupp designed Eagle Ridge’s 5-pars to play as three shot affairs for the mortal golfer and extremely difficult for low hadicappers to get on in the right place in two.
The four of them are all contoured heavily, not much larger than most of the par four greens and also have extreme penalties for poor approach shots.
The #17 hole, which I call “home” (because I live aside the green) is the perfect example. It’s only 517 from the white tees, but goes up a hill leaving a 175-200 yard approach shot (you get good roll if you clear the crest of a hill in the fairway.) That’s where your trouble begins: if you go for it, you have a green that slopes left to right with the right side being a false edge and leading to a sharp drop into a creek. To make matters worse, the green is guarded by bunkers left (and leaving you a downhill to downhill bunker shot) and has a steep rise in the middle that creates anywhere from 4-8 feet of break.
That may seem unfair, but unless you have accuracy and control of your ball flight for a long shot, you need to layup. If you can control the ball, you need to get it on the putting surface and keep it there, and not only that put it in the right spot to have a reasonable eagle putt.
Were the pros to play it as a 4-par, it would almost certainly average 4.3 or more strokes. At least.
by Old Man Par on Jul 8, 2009 2:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just took the “tour” of your course. Looks really nice ! Cupp has some very good designs. Luckily for me, I don’t even think about going for par 5’s in two. I could lose a lot of balls on your course. (they have #17 as a 483 yard par 5 from the white tees on the web site – do they just need to update the yardages ?)
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Jul 8, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup, They Need Updating...
The 517 number jumps out at me because I see it (plus or minus five) from the dial of the Sky Caddie all the time. 487 seems really short, and I wonder if that number would be the one that would be right when the white tees are on the third tier where the senior teebox usually is.
Eagle Ridge is indeed a nice course, and one that’s in great shape for the number of rounds it sees every year as a semi-private. It’s also the kind of course that’s always challenging, even for guys like me that play it so often I rarely even need to look for yardage markers any more. I’d highly recommend it to anyone who is coming through Raleigh and wants a nice game. Heck, that’s why we moved across the city to live there.
by Old Man Par on Jul 8, 2009 3:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What do you say, RB...
….meet you in Raleigh…somewhere around the 17th green at Eagle Ridge ! :-D
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Jul 8, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Count me in! I love Raleigh!
Email me any comments or questions at ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com.
by Ryan Ballengee on Jul 8, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 















