Internet Writer of the Year: Woods? 18 Majors? Nah.
If you're confused by the headline, it might be in a couple of ways.
First, you might be wondering why I'm referring to myself as the Internet Writer of the Year. Well, I'm not. I'm referring to The Times' John Hopkins. He was named the Internet Writer of the Year by the Britain-based Sports Journalists' Association. Just another writers' club that I'm not allowed into, I guess.
Second, why would Hopkins make such a claim with that kind of confidence? In his own words, the IWOTY. (And Jack Nicklaus'.)
My view is constant on this and always has been. I will not put any money on Woods even equalling Nicklaus's record.
What? I hear you exclaim. You mean that the man who at 33 has won 14 major championships will not win four more? The player who can will his ball into the hole better than any previous golfer ever has - as he proved in a tournament in Florida on the last Sunday in March when he made up a five-stroke deficit in the last round and holed for a birdie on the 72nd hole to win by one stroke - might only win three more major championships in his career and maybe not even that many? That Woods, who will be 34 at the end of this year, cannot match or comfortably exceed the record of a man who won his 16th and 17th major championships when he was 40 and his 18th and last at 46?
Nicklaus continued: "You guys are all so willing to hand it to Tiger: '[he's the] greatest player ever', like it's already over ... I'm just saying the kid is amazing and I'll be the first to congratulate him, but doesn't he actually have to do it first?"
I don't think Hopkins is trying to be brash or controversial here. He's just playing the percentages with his opinion.
My percentages say that Woods probably has another good decade in him. That's 40 majors. He will only have to win 5 to beat Nicklaus' mark. That is 12.5% of the majors he enters during a decade in which his edge over the field will get smaller.
To this point in his career as a professional, Woods has entered 48 majors. He has won 14. That is a 29.2% winning percentage.
In other words, Woods would have to win at less than half of the pace that he has set over the course of his professional career. I'm not saying that he'll do it for sure, but in that context, reaching Jack's mark seems a whole lot easier.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Something not to forget...
…Hopkins is in the UK and the legal alcohol level for a pint is much higher than here in the US. :-)
The man’s entitled to his opinion – and I do agree with Nicklaus – don’t hand Woods the record until he’s actually done it.
HOWEVER – while turning my hair grey trying to figure out one of Jempty’s trivia questions, I found it interesting that as far back as 1974, and maybe earlier (I was already going blind trying to find the answers), Nicklaus had been dubbed “the greatest of all time,” and he was hardly done with his career.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Yogi Berra never said this...
“Tiger ain’t got Jack’s record until he’s got Jack’s record…”
Five more majors is a ton of more majors. In a full dozen years on tour, Tiger won 8 majors in the first six and and only 6 after that (or one per year). I say ONLY because it seems like more. Personally, I think the magic number is 21. But, each individual major is a very, very difficult and significant accomplishment.
Can he do it? Will he do it? Most definitely and most probably…
I agree with Court, in the UK they should be more careful letting certain writers drive a computer keyboard after a pint (or nine).
by One-Eyed Golfer Guy on Apr 3, 2009 4:00 PM EDT reply actions

by 
















