Is Woods' Major Obsession Costing Him?
We saw earlier this week that the golf.com angle about Tiger Woods' performance at the Masters was that he might completely revamp his swing, fire Hank Haney, etc.
That argument was made five years ago when Woods had his worst PGA Tour season and was on his way to losing to world number one ranking to Vijay Singh. Woods bounced back, as you well know, and figured out how to implement the Haney-inspired swing with dominating results.
The argument is back in Jaime Diaz's piece about Woods' tournament performance. I don't want to focus on that, though. Rather, it is Diaz's excellent point about Woods' obsession with winning the final four major championships to tie Jack Nicklaus' mark of 18.
[T]he internal pressure that Woods carries in majors—which at his best he tempers with an air of serenity—seemed palpable at Augusta. Dealing with it is likely going to remain a vital issue as Woods gets older. At this point in his career, Woods plays almost exclusively to win majors, which makes them an essentially all-or-nothing proposition. He indirectly made this clear when explaining why he voted for Padraig Harrington for PGA Tour Player of the Year in 2008, even though in less than half a season he compiled more victories and was more consistent. "Paddy won two. End of story," Woods said. When only winning can bring pleasure, and everything else produces displeasure, that's pressure.
This is a fantastic observation - one that you often don't see, but kind of know implicitly. Woods, like Nicklaus, plays to the majors. He plays to peak around them so that he can win them.
For Nicklaus, by the time he had reached this plateau in his career it was clear that he was the greatest major champion in golf history. He had little to prove to anyone. Every major championship win was a bonus. As the gambling term goes, Nicklaus was playing with "house money."
At Woods' 33 years, it is not evident that he is the best ever. He still has to win four more majors - in his mind - before he can consider himself on par with his idol. His age, though still young, when combined with the knee surgery and rehab may have him pressing more than ever to win major championships.
In the Masters, Woods tried the patient approach with his swing and strategy. When Chad Campbell and the rest of the field went low on day one, Woods' traditional Masters strategy to "not lose the tournament on day one" turned out to cost him the tournament. He was so far back by being conservative and respectful of the lengthened Augusta that it would be near impossible for him to comeback.
In fact, Woods once tried and true patience at Augusta doesn't seem to work as well for him anymore at the National. Almost ironically, the lengthened Augusta has forced Woods into a very defensive position at the Masters. For the past couple of years, it nearly paid off with runner up finishes. This year, when scoring conditions were better and the course was set up to yield birdies, Woods did not switch gears to go on the offensive. In the end, that cost him.
The question going into Bethpage in two months will be if Woods has a strategy and a swing that will work in the US Open. He is the defending champion of both the championship and the venue. Perhaps the good vibes of both will provide him with the confidence and collection that it will require to defend his US Open title for the first time in his career.
0 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
and why does anybody listen to someone like Diaz ?
Diaz is a journalistic flunky. He was assigned to follow A-Rod. He was assigned to follow Bonds. That’s his lot in life – he isn’t an “expert” on anything – he is a shadow.
I can see getting rid of Haney – after seeing his assessment of Charles Barkley (“it’s not in his head – it’s all because his club is out of postion at the top” – Hank – YOU’RE nuts if you believe that). I’m not sure that Haney has done anything for Woods that Harmon couldn’t have done better.
But saying that because Woods lost The Masters, he has to completely revamp his entire game is insane. HE ISN’T 100% RECOVERED FROM THE SURGERY !!!!
Saying that because he lost The Masters the last few years he is putting too much pressure on himself to break the record ? Why wasn’t it too much pressure to get the first 14 ?
Diaz is out of his mind. He sees one thing and “analyzes” in a vacuum.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Apr 15, 2009 12:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think any suggestion to fire Haney based on one tournament is just plain dumb and misguided.
But, I do think that it is possible that Tiger’s focus on getting to 18 plus his age COULD be leading to pressing. Hard to say for sure unless you know the guy.
by Ryan Ballengee on Apr 15, 2009 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
32 ??
Traditional thinking says that Woods is just getting to his prime !
I’m not sure this applies to Woods, however, since he started at such a young age. Most of the golfers you see playing their best golf in their mid 30’s were guys who didn’t start playing until they were almost in their teens.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Apr 15, 2009 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Woods is still winning almost all tournaments he plays
yet something is wrong? He didn’t play that great in the Masters YET STILL ALMOST WON!
He is coming back from a MAJOR MAJOR injury people. I can attest personally to it as I had something similar. It took me 2 FULL YEARS to hit again
by AppleCub on Apr 15, 2009 7:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The majors are all well and good...
… but Tiger is also only like 7 or so regular wins behind Nicklaus. So what if he schedules his year around the majors? He’s still found a way to get to third place in total wins – EVER – by the age of 33. He could phone it in until he turns 40 and still take over second place, and can probably even overtake Snead.
He had an “off” week at the Masters and finished T6. I just can’t see how he doesn’t make it well past 18 majors. But even if he doesn’t, would 90 wins and 17 majors not make him the best ever? How about 80 and 17? What if he doesn’t win another regular tournament, but wins 19 majors? Would he be the best ever, at that point? Is majors the only thing that matters? What if he won 19 majors in his career and didn’t have another win? What’s the formula?
I personally think the only way he won’t do it is if something causes him to retire early. But, I’m just a fan, so what do I know.
by Double Eagle on Apr 15, 2009 11:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think it particularly matters – at least for my post – who the public considers to be the best ever. For Woods, it seems simple. It’s 19 majors. So, that’s all he cares about winning between now and the end, right? That is a dangerous thing in some ways.
by Ryan Ballengee on Apr 16, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Majors record may be his biggest goal, but it isn’t his only goal. The guy hates to lose at anything. Do you believe that his Ryder Cup record doesn’t bother him ? How about his driving ? (he told Fred Funk one time that he was coming after his accuracy stat – it was pretty funny even then)
I think that when the media only focuses on the Majors, which trickles down to a large part of the golfing/Tiger fawning public, who then mindlessly repeat that the ONLY things that matter are the Majors, we get this impression that Woods only cares about Majors – and that just isn’t true.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Apr 16, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the majors only matter to Woods in terms of his own perception of his “legacy,” which is a word I hate to use. He is like any great sports competitor. They’re driven by the hatred of failure. Woods certainly is. I don’t think he would deem his career a failure if he ended on any of the combos that DE just mentioned in his reply. That seems ridiculous to me.
by Ryan Ballengee on Apr 16, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Biggest - not Only Goal
I wonder if Woods is driven by hatred of losing – or love of winning. You very rarely see him misbehaving when he doesn’t win – he doesn’t throw tantrums – BUT – you can tell when he isn’t happy with how he played. He never begrudges the guys who finish ahead of him. On the other hand, you don’t really hear him congratulating them, either.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Apr 16, 2009 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think his club throwing, cursing, etc, have gotten a little out of hand lately particularly at Augusta. That band-aid comment was more crass than I’ve come to expect from him. I don’t know what that is a sign of, though.
by Ryan Ballengee on Apr 16, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah – that “bandaid” comment took me by surprise. He is definitely frustrated. Maybe he is looking at the 33 on his driver’s license, feeling the repairs to the knee, and feeling some pressure to reach his goals. He has an insane band of media living up his backside – spewing the idea that it’s possible to come back from major knee surgery and 8 months off to win every time he tees it up.
Somehow, I think his dad would be on the phone either letting him get it off his chest, or chewing him out for his bad behavior in public. All he’s doing is damaging his repuation as a classy person.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Apr 16, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree. I honestly think he feels the pressure given the set of circumstances the have changed in his life. Two kids, busted knee, aging, so close to Jack’s record. I’d feel it.
by Ryan Ballengee on Apr 16, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not seeing the kid angle – he is playing less than a third of the year and has most of the rest of the year to spend time with the kids. He doesn’t play two weeks in a row, so he’s never away from them more than 6 days except for the British.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Apr 16, 2009 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s just another sign of his age. I don’t think the stress of being a parent hits him on the course, per se.
by Ryan Ballengee on Apr 16, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah...
I’m thinking he cares about winning, period. And that means winning the most tournaments, winning the most majors, winning the Ryder Cup, winning the Tavistock Cup, etc. I’m not sure legacy figures in very much.
by Double Eagle on Apr 16, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
YES !
I forgot about the Tavistock Cup ! Who doesn’t want to win their interclub matches ? Geez – what a lineup between those two subdivisions. Tiger’s in need of an extra boat for Charlie (or is it Axel ?) when he gets a few years old.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Apr 16, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














