Ending LPGA Events on Saturday May Not Be a Good Idea
Dottie Pepper spoke with SBJ's Jon Show about a few things LPGA Tour. The most poignant thing to me is something that is seemingly gaining momentum:
I would love to see the LPGA finish on Saturday and have it be a championship Saturday. Start it on Wednesday when you have the only product, and finish it on Saturday when you have the only finishing product. I think it would really bode well for the LPGA to set themselves apart two days of the week.
I have some trepidation about that. After all, golf is a spectator sport and most people can't spectate on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday because of work. So, would a Saturday finish that may improve TV ratings counterbalance a drop in live attendance? Would the exclusivity of being on Wednesday help out the Tour?
The LPGA demographics may tell a different story, particularly compared to other women's sports leagues.

Credit: Sports Business Daily
The fan base of the LPGA Tour is basically split by gender, and almost half are older than 55. The viewer base of the Golf Channel - which will be the LPGA's cable home starting in 2010 - is 75% male and 41% older than 55. The demographics of the Nationwide Tour viewers (also on Golf Channel) are about 70-30 male. In other words, the people that watch the Golf Channel regularly are not the people likely to watch the LPGA Tour.
Of course, that can change with this new contract. Golf Channel could skew more female and younger. Or, it may result in no real gain in ratings for the LPGA Tour.
By no means am I an expert on television demographics or congruence or any of that stuff. But, it seems to me like perhaps the average daytime viewer of the Golf Channel wouldn't bother tuning in to LPGA Tour golf a day early.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
what I haven't heard specfied...
…I’ve heard the thought tossed out over the last few weeks (as usual, Dottie is late to the party) about Saturday finishes. That’s how the LPGA used to do things. I’m surprised that hasn’t been pointed out more. The LPGA used to be a 3 round tour except for the majors.
The debate over the Saturday finishes hasn’t included the number of rounds. Are they suggesting 4 rounds starting on Wednesday ? Not likely to happen, since that would cut into pro-am days – a big revenue stream. Nobody is saying if they want to return to the 3 round tournaments or stay with the mostly 4 round tournaments we have today.
Women’s golf doesn’t draw huge numbers on TV or in person, and the two major tours don’t play in the same cities at the same time – so people who want to go out and watch professional golf live will do it in whatever area they are in. Those numbers are pretty insignificant compared to TV numbers since you’ll get 10,000 to 20,000 in a gallery depending on the field, the tournament significance, and the location. So it seems to me that the tournaments do better numbers at the gate with two rounds on the weekends – but it will ultimately be determined by where the most money comes from – weekend attendance or TV advertising revenue for Saturday or Saturday and Sunday broadcasts.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
I don’t think they’re implying going back to three round events, but keeping them at four. It’s a perilous idea because of the pro-ams. Are they on Monday only? When do players practice?
by Ryan Ballengee on Mar 4, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions
they're just not being specific enough
these people making the argument need to be more specific. if you’re going to promote 4 day tournaments with a Saturday finish, then you’re dealing with one set of parameters – and if you want to go back to the 3 round tournaments, you deal with a completely different set of parameters.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
the graphs...
…are those TV percentages or attendance percentages ?
I wonder about stats like those. Most people who watch golf actually play or used play the game…except when Tiger is playing, of course. It doesn’t draw many people from other sports just to see what’s going on. You see a pretty fair number of women in the galleries – but how many are actually golfers ? A lot of women just go because it’s a nice place to go walk around outside. (and, of course, the ladies who like to go check out Camillo Villegas’ guns) :-)
It must be almost impossible to get an accurate breakdown of who is where for what reason.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
These are based on TV numbers. Yeah, in person would be next to impossible to analyze.
by Ryan Ballengee on Mar 4, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions
terrible terrible idea
unless you think that TV money is the only measure of a tour’s success. I agree with Court – the LPGA is in a different city than the guys and usually a different time zone, which has made it rather easy to avoid going head-to-head with the PGA. I documented what a good job they do with the schedule in that respect (sometime last year, can’t remember when). Any advantage gained by shifting to Wed-Sun would be lost by the smaller galleries (certainly don’t need THAT!) and the inclination that would naturally follow to shorten the events to three rounds. No, and hell no!
just to be clear
I don’t care if they play 3 or 4 rounds, but going to watch tournament golf is a full day committment – which, for most of us, is easier to do on the weekend. These tournaments generally only come to an area one time a year, so for the local fans, it’s pretty easy to plan a day or two at the tournament.
Has anybody seen a comparison of Saturday numbers between the LPGA and PGA Tour broadcasts ? That’s what it would come down to – TV revenue for a Saturday finish (with savings of one less day of broadcast costs) vs two days of broadcasting.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by 















