The 19th Hole: O'Hair Psychs Himself Out Against Woods
Tiger Woods entered the final round of the Arnold Palmer Invitational with a five shot deficit to make up again 54 hole leader Sean O’Hair. To that point in the tournament, O’Hair had played almost flawless golf among a field that was struggling to corral the Bay Hill layout. Even if it were played at its true par of 72, scoring at Arnie’s place still would have seemed out of whack.
The final threesome, though – with former Masters champion Zach Johnson – proved to be the downfall for O’Hair. Among the players that finished in the top ten on the final leaderboard, O’Hair was the only player other than Jason Gore to post a score worse than 70. In other words, as fantastic as Woods was to post 67 and win the tournament for the sixth time, Sean O’Hair served it up to him.
O’Hair’s struggles with the 54 hole lead are nothing new. In three other PGA Tour events in which he has held the third round lead, O’Hair has failed to win all of them. Both of his PGA Tour wins – ’05 John Deere Classic & ’08 Transitions Championship – were come from behind victories.
His most famous loss has to be the 2007 Players Championship. O’Hair entered the final round with a two shot advantage. Trailing Phil Mickelson by a shot on the 17th hole, O’Hair pumped his tee ball into the water twice en route to losing the championship and finishing tied for 11th place. It could be argued that the failure to win really had more to do with a gimmick hole than O’Hair.
Still, to fail now in three other tries with the 54 hole lead indicates a pattern of struggling to succeed in the most optimal position entering the final round.
It could be easy to simply chalk up this loss at the Arnold Palmer Invitational to the allure and intimidation of Tiger Woods. Perhaps that is part of the reason for the collapse.
Then again, Zach Johnson was one-under par in the final threesome with Woods. Johnson certainly faced no pressure from Woods because he was not in contention until the final two or three holes, when he secured third place with great play.
It was on O’Hair to maintain his massive lead, win for the first time with the third round lead in tow, and stare down the best player in the universe to prevent him from making his comeback victory happen on O’Hair’s watch. Admittedly, that can produce a lot of pressure.
O’Hair maintained throughout the press conference on Saturday night that he would play his own game, ignore Woods for better or worse, and do everything he could to win. Unfortunately, O’Hair never really found the game that got him into that coveted position. He flared to the right almost all day. Consistently short on putts, O’Hair struggled to hole out at crucial times to stave off Woods’ charge. O’Hair may very well have played his own game, but it simply was not there. With no good play to focus on, O’Hair’s mind was likely sucked into the vortex of Tiger Woods’ intimidating aura.
Sean O’Hair is a very talented kid. He is in his mid-twenties and will have many years on Tour to figure out how to win while leading the pack. O’Hair, though, is not unique in his struggles to learn how to win. In fact, he is among a group of twenty-somethings that cannot seem to thrive when the pressure is applied.
It may have something to do with the pace of play of O’Hair and his peers. O’Hair is one of the slowest players on the PGA Tour. As the round drew out and Woods grew closer, O’Hair became even more deliberate in his routine. The longer that O’Hair took to play, the worse the results seemed to be.
The old Bobby Jones saying is that “golf is a game that is played on a five-inch course - the distance between your ears.” O’Hair may well psych himself out in the time that it takes for him to select a club, practice his new mechanics, visualize the shot, get all of the bad thoughts out of his head, and swing the club. For O’Hair, sports psychology may be failing him because he is using it to an extreme.
I have always found that I play my best golf when the sun is about to set. The only reason that I can think of to explain the trend is that I play quicker and with better focus as the sun is setting. If I can play both quickly and well, then I’m more likely to finish my round.
It seems apropos, then, to offer this as advice to Sean O’Hair on the day after the Arnold Palmer Invitational was stolen from him in the dusk:
Stop burning daylight.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
seems to be a pattern lately...
…a few weeks ago, it was Nick Watney with a chance to put Mickelson away when Phil kindly dropped his ball under a thick plant, then bounced the “upside down iron played from the right side” shot off of a tree. Watney yahks his approach shot into a bunker left of the green in a very tough position and leaves the first blast in the sand.
This weekend O’Hair couldn’t get a lag putt inside of 6’ on the first 12 holes, then couldn’t hit an approach inside of 50’ when Woods was doing all he could to self destruct. Woods hits two bunkers down the stretch, leaving his ball under the lip with no real chance for a reasonable par putt. Reverse the situation and Tiger rips O’Hair’s heart out of his chest with his approaches and putts.
How does someone get “hungry” for the win when they have millions of dollars in the bank ?
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
That may well be a part of it. I honestly just think that these kids don’t get into position to win that often – they get to the pros by being in the upper echelon, but not the best. They can make millions of dollars being pretty good.
by Ryan Ballengee on Mar 30, 2009 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions
no doubt about it. I guess that’s what sets the champions apart from the guys who win now and then…and then the journeymen who never get there.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
I like Sean but it was a joke
He didn’t look anywhere near himself in the last day
Anyone remember the chip on 10 or 11? The water hole Par 5 where he came up 30ft short on a simple 100-yard punch? If he had done the last previous 3 days, he would have put it right next to the hole.
It is time for someone to put their foot on Woods throat and actually play their game against him.
I think Sean really was impacted by that Players meltdown. He was bested that day, but 17 really seems to be in his head.
by Ryan Ballengee on Mar 30, 2009 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions
of course OHair was intimidated by Woods
I can’t think of a PGA player who wouldn’t be who is paired with Tiger on the final Sunday. As soon as I watched him play two holes I knew Tiger had that one locked up.
In Romo we Trust
To the point about young guns being happy with the money, read this Hawk blog post. Totally lays it out.
good piece
Sort of a difference in Federer and all of his wins and time as the #1 player in the world – and Journeyman John Rollins. Federer’s expectations of himself are JUST a bit higher.
Golf and tennis are similar in the way players are generally expected to behave on court and towards each other. Interviews are usually trades of pats on the back. However, the face to face nature of tennis makes those emotional post match reactions more likely. Golf moves at a leisurely walking pace with a lot of time between shots. Hard to get really amped up for that "I’m really pissed off that I played like I did today in golf.
We are talking about the most skilled and complete tennis player ever, a man who has everything but would still give anything to repair the failure he has brought on himself. Rollins has had a few outbursts in his career, but nobody really expects him to win week in and week out.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by 












