The Decider: How You Think the Media is Doing on The Tiger Story
As you probably have figured out, I've grown kinda tired of the Tiger Woods story. Ok, I get it. He's a sex addict. He's been taking ambien and vicodin on the order that would make Patrick Kennedy blush. And Elin has had enough of his crap - she's going back to Sweden. Oh, and the Florida State Attorney's office probably put the kabash on a legit subpoena request.
Well, this story also appears to be taking an existential turn toward the media. They're starting to analyze themselves, including Sal Johnson of Golf Observer.
With golf blogs, other non-golf blogs, gossip blogs, golf media, and mainstream media in the mix, tell me who you think is doing a good job in covering this story and who is doing a horrible job. You can be specific to a person or an article, or just name an outlet.
It's up to you, but I want to get a feel for how you the media has been doing on this story.
0 recs |
53 comments
|
Comments
I think the media is having a field day – absolute joy on their part. They have a chance to get back at a guy they think has snubbed them for 13 years and has refused to GIVE them what they want. This is pure vindictiveness from people who think that tearing down people is what they are supposed to do.
So much for the neutral media.
Yes – Tiger was wrong for doing what he did – and he is going to pay for it – but it is STILL none of our business.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
The London Times printed this article today – which is a different take on ’it’s none of our business’. Yes he needs to be allowed to patch up his personal relationships in private, but the fact of his hypocrisy (relying on a ‘clean family image’) needs exposing.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/columnists/matthew_syed/article6949424.ece
I can see why the public is angry about the hypocrisy of being a pitchman, family man, blah blah. But isn’t it kind of our fault for buying into it?
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Dec 9, 2009 1:48 PM EST up reply actions
That's a Good Point
In cases like this, we kind of make the assumption about what a person is like behind closed doors. Aside from winnings on the course, Tiger Woods takes money from sponsors to endorse their products. That’s pretty much it.
It’s not like he pulled an Eliot Spitzer where he was a crusader against prostitution and then ended up spending taxpayer money on high-priced prostitutes as attorney general and then governor of NY.
If Tiger goes out and stumps for family values and the like, then fine, we were misled. But if we just kind of assumed it, then we’re somewhat complicit in the creation of that image.
That argument won't ever catch on!
The public taking responsibility for being willing schills? C’mon! BTW, I agree.
by handicapismyswing on Dec 9, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions
What hypocrisy ? How can you claim hypocrisy on a subject nobody knows anything about ? Was it Tiger’s fault that the media made the conclusions they made ? Did Tiger ever go out and claim to be the all-American, Norman Rockwell family man ? No – never.
We’ve seen Elin at a couple of tournaments and the Ryder Cup – but he has never put his family in front of the public the way Mickelson parades his kids and wife around.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Well, RB, I think you’ve done a decent job with this. You have for the most part refrained from making assumptions, which is more than can be said for much of the media.
As for the worst…it almost has to be “the worldwide leader in sports.” When an organization with the resources available to ESPN spends much of its time relying on a gossip website, there’s a problem.
"...it is well to remember that to miss a putt is not a criminal offense and does not prevent a man from being an excellent husband, father, and citizen." - Bernard Darwin
by turnover on Dec 9, 2009 9:43 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Oh, and...
…Kennedys don’t blush. That rosy glow? That’s just the alcohol.
"...it is well to remember that to miss a putt is not a criminal offense and does not prevent a man from being an excellent husband, father, and citizen." - Bernard Darwin
by turnover on Dec 9, 2009 9:52 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Agreed 100% with Court. The Media is enjoying this to the max.
Okay, that said, Woods has handled this as poorly as anyone possibly could. He needs to go on Oprah or something and get in front of this story and own up to whatever. America loves to give second chances and to forgive those that are forthright. They also loathe those that are caught and still show contempt.
I say that Tiger should consider doing that from a PR perspective, not from a “I have a right to know” perspective — because I don’t have any right to know. Still, Woods is letting the other side – the sensationalista, if you will, take potshot after potshot.
That would help kill this thing and get the focus of the game back to where it should be — on the golf course.
The best at covering this? Don’t know. I am actually actively trying to avoid it all, simply because it is not all that interesting.
The worst? Well, aside from the Radar Online’s, the TMZ’s, etc., ABCDESPN, IMO, because they are pretty much breathlessly forcing this to the top of their coverage.
media
I think it has been the media that made tiger who he is in popularity amoungst the “Fringe Fan” element over the past 10 years or so. Us regular golf fans that follow ALL golf, PGA, LPGA, European Tour etc. etc. always knew who tiger was based on his on course performance with the game itself. Now that his infidelity has been made public he has to take it like a man as to whatever comes his way. I beleive SOME of the media outlets have done poorly with all the speculation but remember this, "If Tiger had come clean from the start none of the speculation would have been necessary. On top of it TIGER lied and said ALL of the allegations “Are False”. Which we know now has been proven differently. The media is just being the media, reporting the news with some added sensationalizm. Heck, the media did a good job sensationalizing Tiger when things were going his way. The “Return of Tiger commercial” comes to mind narrated by James Earl Jones. It was well timed and well planned ahead prior to his announced return. They made it sound like it was the next coming of the man upstairs. Elin and the kids are the victims here and NOT TIGER. This will not go away any time soon and I wouldn’t be surprised if he is heckled when he makes his return to the course. I remember back when Tiger told Fuzzy Zeller that he was forgiven for saying what he did, but also added that he would never forget it. Whats good for the goose has to be good for the gander and TW is not above that in any way , shape or form…..jumpn/progolf
"pain is only weakness leaving the body"
Well I’m not sure I would say they are the best or worst, but everyone tore apart the National Enquirers and the US Weeklys of the world when this story came out. How’d that turn out? What they were reporting on was pretty accurate from what we can tell so far, no? I agree it’s gotten way out of control and it’s difficult to tell who’s doing a good job vs. bad, because everyone and their brother has an opinion.
However, I think Jay Busbee from Devil Ball has been doing a pretty solid job on it.
How about some good golf news? How about John Daly?
When will the Tiger schadenfreude (delight in another person’s misfortune) slow down and stop? There is some positive golf news deserving of our attention. I am speaking of the magnificent John Daly makeover. The bad boy of golf, loved by the masses for his cantankerous lifestyle and booming drives, has taken positive steps in re-inventing himself. Something Mr. Woods will need to do. The difference between these two is we knew the real John Daly from day one and we accepted him for being just that. Thank you, John, for being honest with us.
http://retiredcoach.blogspot.com
I would’ve done something on Daly yesterday, but everyone else did, so I didn’t feel like that was a good idea.
BUT, I do have a Kenny Perry interview that’s going up today that I think you’ll really like.
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Dec 9, 2009 10:29 AM EST up reply actions
CHEATER!!!
Am I the only one who thinks that Daly is being given too much credit? He had a surgery that prevents him from stuffing his face and it has led to his weight loss. That’s cheating!
Whatever happened to hard work? Daly is going to find out the hard way that legitimate, long term changes comes from making changes to your lifestyle, not taking the easy way out.
It’s no different than a drunk that takes anabuse, which I’m sure Daly knows about, too. It might help in the short term, but changes comes from within.
It’s the same old s**t with Daly. Every couple years we all get excited and say, “Look at JD! He’s changed! He’s got a new wife, he found God, he’s lost weight, he’s practicing again, he stopped drinking a gallon of Jack Daniels a day, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH!”
And it always turns out the same…
Surgery is not an easy way out. It’s a tool that helps facilitate lifestyle changes. It is not a magic bullet. There are people who don’t make the appropriate changes in life style and don’t lose weight or gain it back after a short while. If he doesn’t make those changes, then he’ll be the same way.
But if you think it’s an easy way out, you’re sadly mistaken and clearly don’t understand situations like his.
by Double Eagle on Dec 9, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions
Your response bespeaks of significant maturity and humanity that the person you were replying to obviously lacks.
by handicapismyswing on Dec 9, 2009 11:24 AM EST up reply actions
I wish John Daly the best. However, his track record suggests that he won’t make any long-term changes and will (a) be fat again, (b) be drunk again and © be relying on sponsors exemptions to play PGA Tour events where he will miss the cut and sell junk out of his RV on the weekend.
Maturity and humanity are not my strengths, but I’m very good at being realistic.
Maybe You're Right
Who knows whether he’ll fail or not. But trying and failing is better than doing nothing. So I say good for him for trying. The man has issues, but he’s been pretty open and honest with fans. For that, I cut him some slack because he doesn’t pretend to be someone else than who he really is.
When someone takes a fall, we can either reach out our hand and help that person up, or we can just say, “I knew it,” and turn our backs. If I knew him personally, I would help him up. I would do the same for many people I know because people who want to make real changes in their lives need the support of others.
by Double Eagle on Dec 9, 2009 12:13 PM EST up reply actions
BMoreMatt...
Can’t argue with history, and I agree with Double Eagle that you may be right about the outcome. I also agree with DE that at least he is up front about his problems and shortcomings, and that buys him some credit for trying in my book. It’s easy to let cynicism get the best of us all at times, but I’ll save mine for the unrepentant!
by handicapismyswing on Dec 9, 2009 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
I think there was a time when the media would take events and report the facts, put them in context, and allow a reader/viewer to make decisions. Or they would write op-ed’s that openly gave the reader a point of view.
Now it seems like they just report whatever the “juiciest” story is, no matter how worthless it is. If i ran all over town talking about the messy divorce of my neighbor, and joking about domestic violence and substance abuse, I’m pretty sure people would think I was a sick puppy, and they’d be right.
But because there’s this thin dehumanizing veneer of celebrity, I can pretend I’m not sick, and that this is somehow newsworthy and worth talking about, because he plays golf on TV.
I think what the media is doing (not just in Tiger’s case, all the celebritiphilia) is sick, and the fact that it’s so popular is depressing.
A new phase
Now it’s no longer Tiger Woods. It’s how the media is treating the Tiger Woods Story. A “New Era” if you will….. As some one said previously, opinions are like belly buttons. I looked at some other blogs. TGC at it’s nastiest, weirdest, worst can’t hold a candle to some of the perverse, profane comments I’ve seen. And waggle is like a catechism class! As Martha Stewart is so famous for saying, that’s “a good thing”! And speaking of comebacks from moral torpitude….My wife is watching the G-rated Bonnie Hunt Show…one of her guests, Paul Rubens, aka PeeWee Herman….. Now that’s a comeback!!! Makes Kobe’s MVP award last season look pedestrian by contrast…..
Holy s**t!
I didn’t know John Hinkley had a blog!
"...it is well to remember that to miss a putt is not a criminal offense and does not prevent a man from being an excellent husband, father, and citizen." - Bernard Darwin
by turnover on Dec 9, 2009 12:17 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I’m sure I could point to spots where some journalist or outlet did this or that wrong or where some journalist or outlet did it right. In a perfect world, only facts would be reported and if that were the case, this story would have died almost immediately. But they dug deeper, as they are prone to do and now the story had grown way beyond where any of us would have anticipated.
I’m not sure I agree that this is vindictive reporting. It certainly might seem that way until you consider that they would do the exact same thing to any celebrity they could bury. That’s what sells, and it’s the way of things now, unfortunately. If anything, I attribute it to his previously perceived squeaky clean image, which made it all the more shocking, putting it right up the alley of today’s media.
Toppling people is what they do and they do it well. Which is why I’m utterly amazed that Tiger was able to keep any of these affairs secret at all, let alone for a prolonged period. It must have taken great planning and expense.
There’s one prominent person I can think of that gets a complete pass from the media, but I’m not going there because I don’t want this to degrade into a political war. I will say, though, that if he had any transgressions that were discovered, the sharks would be swimming in that direction in about 3 seconds time. All of them. And they would revel in shedding a tear as they tore him to the ground.
No relationship...
between journalism and the media anymore. Ryan has done a pretty good job of trying to be a journalist about it all, but we live in times when rumors and innuendo that would have been relegated to gossip columns are now front page stories. These days the gossip, the accusation, whether unfounded and unverified or not, IS the story. The consumer of “news” is left totally to their own devices to rhetorically filter the information and decide if it is news or not. It used to be the function of the fourth estate to apply those standards in advance, but they have mostly abdicated.
by handicapismyswing on Dec 9, 2009 10:55 AM EST reply actions
Bringing down a superstar
Maybe I shouldn’t be surprised about this media frenzy concerning Tiger. I get the feeling this backlash is a response to the way Tiger kept the media at arms lenth. Here in Britain and in Australia, the tabloids tend to tear down thier sporting heros…almost saying " you have become too big, who do you think you are ? " There is a love of the underdog here, remember that bafoon Eddie the eagle in the Olympics representing Britain ? What a joke…yet much of the public loved him. Whereas in the USA, sporting heros tend to be worshiped for life, ie Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, Jabbar, Palmer, Nicklaus, etc. Winners. But it seems that Tiger became too big…too dominant…and seemingly un-gracious about it…wouldn’t sign autographs like Phil, etc. And now, thanks to his double life, he has a long way to fall. Will he quit ? Come April, at the Masters will probably give some answer to all that.
excuse me, did someone die?
There were probably three days when there was nothing on the front page of this Web site but tiger-gate b.s. The only outlet I’m aware of that hasn’t touched the story is Daily Kos. The story is, some athlete cheated on his wife, a lot. No one died, no one went bankrupt, the stock market didn’t crash. People should have better things to do than gossip about someone they don’t actually know?
I’m only commenting here because you asked, I guess I’ll be gone for a few more days.
Truth has a well-known liberal bias.
THIS JUST IN.....not kidding either.
One of my business partners just came into my office and told me that a close friend of his that lives on Louise Cove Drive @ Isleworth CC had this to say,,,Elin did indeed take a few swipes at TW with a club inside the home at 2:00 am and one of which did graze his mouth. She then proceeded to start smashing things up inside the home with the same club, creating some big time damage to furniture, walls and some collectables not to mention the real estate itself. He was told this is one of the many reasons the authorities were not allowed in the house even 3 days later, due to extensive damage. Neither he or I can verify the story, but he isn’t the type that gets vamboozled into spreading rumors without hearing it from a reliable source. Sounds to me like it may be viable as he has known this guy for 25 years or so. Who knows !!! Just thought I’d share that with ya’as…jumpn/progolf
"pain is only weakness leaving the body"
Media, just in
Progolf, this reminds me about a thought I had about the media. WE are the media. Cameras on mobile phones..hearsay, etc…we are the media’s unpaid eyes…e mail your latest photos to CNN ! There is no limit these days.
I have yet to read even
one verifiable fact over and above Tiger’s statement.
Unlike Kobe, Plexico, Jayson Williams and scores of other celebrities, there was no murder, illegal hand guns or sexual assault. It is a character defect, not a crime, and as my main man, courtgolf, says, it is truly nobody’s business. Like, dislike him. Buy his products, don’t buy them. Root for or against him. But, just shut up. It is NONE OF OUR BUSINESS…
...from the land of pleasant living, Baltimore. Stop by and visit us anytime at www.oneeyedgolfer.blogspot.com
by One-Eyed Golfer Guy on Dec 9, 2009 6:07 PM EST reply actions
Made it our business by making millions of dollars selling his image as a wholesome family man and honorable sportsman. End of discussion.
by handicapismyswing on Dec 9, 2009 7:17 PM EST up reply actions
You guys keep talking about
this not being any of our business. Duh!! Whether or not it is any of our business is totally irrelevant. We are not butting into Tigers business, but commenting on news articles and reports that we get from the media. Nothing you or I say here will have any direct or indirect effect on Tiger or his family. Our comments and opinions are strictly for those of us visiting this blog, and it would seem as though we all have very strong feelings concerning the news we are getting. So give your opinion or comment, but don’t shut up!
The only part that is our business IMO
Is if his celebrity (or his powerful attorneys) afforded him (or his wife) the chance to avoid charges that his neighbors across the street would have faced in the same situation.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
I personally agree...
But prevailing legal precedent holds that if you are, for instance, the greatest golfer in the world and that makes you famous, your right to privacy remains relatively intact. However, if you treat your celebrity as a commodity and trade on it for profit (endorsements etc) the waters are somewhat muddied as to whether your rights are defensible. Not the best of situations IMO, but the reality of the world we live in.
by handicapismyswing on Dec 10, 2009 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
I might agree if it were Nike, AT&T, and Gatorade trotting these women out for public consumption because they wanted to get rid of Tiger’s endorsement fees – but this is a pure media feeding frenzy chumming the water for a weak minded public that gets its jollies tearing down the wealthy and successful.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Sorry man,
But I fail to see the relevance of this post. We were discussing the right to privacy and what the limits are as it relates to celebrity. I’m not seeing your point at all.
by handicapismyswing on Dec 10, 2009 6:02 PM EST up reply actions
you brought up LEGAL precedents, then got into “right to privacy” (which technically doesn’t exist past the point of government intervention into your privacy). The only people with legal “rights” to dig into Tiger are his endorsers who were given that right by contract.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Check your facts! From legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com....
which technically doesn’t exist past the point of government intervention into your privacy??
invasion of privacy n. the intrusion into the personal life of another, without just cause, which can give the person whose privacy has been invaded a right to bring a lawsuit for damages against the person or entity that intruded. However, public personages are not protected in most situations, since they have placed themselves already within the public eye, and their activities (even personal and sometimes intimate) are considered newsworthy, i.e. of legitimate public interest. However, an otherwise non-public individual has a right to privacy from: 1) intrusion on one’s solitude or into one’s private affairs; 2) public disclosure of embarrassing private information; 3) publicity which puts him/her in a false light to the public; 4) appropriation of one’s name or picture for personal or commercial advantage.
by handicapismyswing on Dec 10, 2009 7:38 PM EST up reply actions
I’ve been trying to figure out who “the media” is…and then this comment struck me…Easingwold said:
Media, just in Progolf, this reminds me about a thought I had about the media. WE are the media. Cameras on mobile phones..hearsay, etc…we are the media’s unpaid eyes…e mail your latest photos to CNN ! There is no limit these days.
I think “the media” at one time felt an obligation and duty to report news to us and for the most part I think we did get researched and objective information – but on their time, not ours.
But then came cable tv, the internet, and cell phones – information is at our fingertips and we’ve become a society that desires instant gratification…I think partly because 24hour news, sports and entertainment channels, along with blogs and internet sites, need stuff to keep us wanting to tune in…they reprocess, repackage, and reanalyze one news story because if we’ve heard it once what would be the point of hanging around?
To me, this story lives on because there are so many elements to it – ironically, the least important being the golf element. The story is a commentary on our own perceptions of the media’s reporting of facts or rumors (along with their motivation), of who and what we admire (and why we admire or don’t admire), of where our own moral compass is pointing, and coming to terms with the fact that what we preceived may not be reality.
Easingwold is right, we really have become the media, and I guess we have to be the editors of all the information that is thrown at us, filtering through everything and deciding for ourselves what is true and what isn’t, the only sad part is none of us get a paycheck for having to do all that work!
Media thoughts
Thank you, red tees, for putting my thoughts into words in a good way my brain wouldn’t let me…these night shifts are killers !
I really like this line of discussion – this might be worthwhile of its own post.
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Dec 10, 2009 3:25 PM EST up reply actions
Which I highly encourage either of you to write :)
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Dec 10, 2009 3:51 PM EST up reply actions
One more thought on the media
Remember the movie Robocop, back in the ’80’s ? The way the media was portrayed in that film almost seems upon us. Can it really get that bad ? Wouldn’t surprise me in the least.
Hadn't thought about that in years...
but I’m afraid we are, as you said, on the doorstep. I have learned to act and react to situations with the assumption in mind that no matter where I am, it is not unlikely that a camera is trained and rolling. It took a litlle longer than Orwell thought, but 1984 has arrived! Big brother, be it the government, the media, or your neighbor, is always watching.
by handicapismyswing on Dec 10, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions

by 
















