Tiger's Devil is in How the Details Are Handled - Not the Details Themselves
Admittedly, I've been following this Tiger Woods crash/affair rumor/circus since Wednesday evening when I had read about the National Enquirer's out-of-nowhere claim that Woods was having an affair with Rachel Uchitel.
I thought, "Tiger has the highest blandness quotient* of every celebrity alive. Why would the Enquirer print such a thing?"
*For those of you that don't know the term that I just made up, "blandness quotient" is a simple function of how famous someone is on a scale of 1 to 100, divided by how boring they are or try to be publicly on an descending 10 scale (1 being opera boring). The closer you get to 100 on the blandness quotient, the more bland you are. For example, Tiger is about a 100. Kim Kardashian is about a 5 - 50/10.
I kind of left the story alone and went about my merry way. Nothing posted here about the rumor, though I was getting phone calls and text messages and Tweets and the other three ways you can get a hold of me asking me if I knew anything. No, I didn't.
Then through the other two ways - the Batphone and carrier pigeon - that people could find me, I started being told cryptic rumors and supposed details behind the story. Again, all speculation. Some of it was wild. Like John Stamos-Rebecca Romijn swinger party wild.
On Friday, I'm driving around western Pennsylvania, showing off where my wedding reception will be in six months, when I get more messages (including a few smoke signals) that Tiger had been "seriously" hurt in a crash. We all know where that has led since, but my initial intrigue was wondering if Tiger was physically ok. And then it was about the rumor. I guess being at my wedding reception site kind of made me fire those synapses a little more quickly.
It was a long day on Friday. People calling me. Me calling people trying to get facts and statements. I talked to Rachel Uchitel, who seems like a perfectly nice lady who is really distressed right now. Unbeknownst to her, she went from New York City social diva to a purported party girl, coke fiend, and homewrecker overnight.
Over the weekend, Tiger's image was also transformed in the minds of many from a 100 on the blandness quotient to a 7.5 or so. (People just love Kim Kardashian!) His wife was vilified. He was lambasted for his silence. Even when he did say something, he was criticized for saying next to nothing.
Like Joe Posnanski - a writer that I am a huge fanboy of - I became more interested in how this whole thing was handled. Not just by Tiger, but by my media brethren (can I say that?), the Florida Highway Patrol, and Tiger's management team.
This was a comedy of errors.
The traditional media - you know, the one with standards - didn't react fast enough to break news. They were left waiting to report conflicting facts to the public. Who knows what is right. I still haven't even seen the police report to have a baseline of what the police were told happened.
Everyone was hush-hush about the most powerful man in our sport, except them-there nasty bloggers that were trying to add two and two together. Like an Orwellian pawn, many in the traditional media just kept allowing the players in this situation to tell them that the answer should be five.
For their part, the Florida Highway Patrol just cannot seem to spell Tiger's last name right. He is not Tiger Wood. He is Tiger Woods. And they had been dealing with the guy all weekend and still can't spell his name right. Possessive of Woods is Woods' or Woods's. Not Wood's. Really makes you wonder about things if that minor details - the subject's name - can't be handled. And I'm pretty sure it isn't an innocent mistake because they're all fans of European Tour Rookie of the Year Chris Wood down there in Orlando.
Meanwhile, TMZ.com claims to have buddies everywhere! The police department must be as porous as an offensive line protecting David Carr because supposedly the FHP told TMZ that Elin changed her story, and she's a violent psychopath, and she bashed in the car before the accident. Also, apparently TMZ has buddies that are friends of Tiger's, too, talking about how his wife went "ghetto" and he needs a "Kobe special." For a guy that is so loaded and influential as Woods is, I find it hard to believe that his friends would be so desperate to talk to a gossip site. But, again, I don't know!
The thing about TMZ and the Enquirer, though, is that they're like the Terminator. They don't go away. They just keep coming. Hell, I think sometimes they make up stories on a hunch that turn out to be at least partially true just to keep the story going. They focus on the unknown now - a moment so fast that truthiness can pass for information. And they're really good at it.
This was their first foray into golf, though, that I can remember. They didn't really care about Arjun Atwal's highway drag race that led to an unfortunate fatality. Tripp Isenhour killing a rare bird with a golf ball? Who? The ole rumors about Phil Mickelson don't even make it to their doorstep because a gambling problem is common, and Charles Barkley already has that market cornered.
So, when gossip sites care about golf, they must think that they have something, right? They're not going away though most everyone else will respect Woods' website apology/plea for privacy.
(Why apologize for hitting a hydrant? I crushed into the back of a car in high school because I saw my girlfriend driving down the other side of the road and was too dumb to go from 40 to 0. I only got to about 32. And all of my high school friends drove by the accident, cheering me on. Now that's embarrassing.)
Bottom line is that when the AP is even asking questions in a column that are based on hearsay and incomplete info related to a minor traffic incident, the situation requires some serious PR work.
IMG tried to do that by telling us Tiger was in a minor accident and left the hospital in good condition. Later, we find out that he was unconscious for six minutes. Ok, fine.
Then, Tiger's agent at IMG, Mark Steinberg, was the second person to tell the police that Tiger wasn't talking to them about what they termed a minor car accident. I still tell the above story of my accident because it's funny, even if my insurance premiums weren't for a couple of years.
And finally, Tiger's freshly-hired defense attorney Mark NeJame gave the police what was legally required. Tiger asked us all to move on, probably knowing full well that not everyone will hear that message.
So, where do we go from here? Well, seems like the public is split in half on whether they want to keep this thing afloat. TMZ is going to because they're saying that the Florida Highway Patrol may try to get a hold of any blood sampling done at the hospital as part of their investigation in which they say charges are still pending. I guess the FHP was upset about getting blown off not once, not twice, but thrice. Gloria Allred - Rachel Uchitel's new attorney - isn't going to let this go. I assume the Enquirer is prepared to be served with papers soon.
And then there's the golf world, which seemingly has no other story to go on right now. (Yes, there are other ones. The Molinari brothers, golf rounds being down 16% in October year over year, and Japanese pro golf would all do nicely.) But, the only real game in town in the Yankee golf scene is Tiger's Chevron World Challenge. Does he show up and play? Does he show up at all? The tournament doesn't even know and he's supposed to have a press conference tomorrow.
If he does come and have the presser, will the media even try to ask him anything related to it? Did the Enquirer and TMZ enable the traditional press with a sense of false bravado like YE Yang instilled in some of Tiger's on-course foes after Hazeltine? Like Yang, probably not.
But the intrigue here no longer is really about what happened. It's about how what happened is handled.
0 recs |
29 comments
|
Comments
The devil is ALWAYS in the details
Ryan my man, First of all, the opinion of my fellow bloggers transplanting to waggleroom from the Golf Channel blogs are very positive about this site. Everyone likes it so far including myself. As you can see by the 113 post in your other article, we are very opinionated. Keep up the good work with this site. SECOND, The devil is always in the details and I believe the NIKE purchasing public and the fans with children that idolize TW have a right to know what happened, GOOD , BAD , or INDIFFERENT. Indeed the details were handled poorly, in fact the lack there of is more like it. If what TW says is true then why would he not invite the police in to CLEAR THE AIR, rather than risking speculation as we have now ? Perhaps there was damage to the inside of the home and additional evidence of a scuffle. (speculation I know ) I always believe that it is better to clear the air yourself rather than allowing others to make an attempt at it. Staying silent will always add additional speculation and it will cause bigger headaches for the woods camp if it comes out that what TMZ and the NE is true. Ryan, Love the website and keep up the good work….progolf/jumpn
by progolf on Nov 30, 2009 11:26 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Have to disagree with you pretty strongly on #2. The public has absolutely no “RIGHT” to know anything. Ttrust me – I just ran a search through The Constitution and there is no mention of Nike, Tiger Woods, or anything to do with the private lives of individuals in this country. In fact, there are several lines that remind us that even the government has no right to know the details of a person’s life unless they are breaking the law.
There is no dirty air for Tiger to “clean”. Both sides of the bimbo in question have denied anything to do with each other. The police have said that alcohol had nothing to do with the accident.
End of story – that’s as much as anyone has a “right” to know – and that is more than they actually have a “right” to know.
Stop falling for media propaganda. What they demand and write is for THEIR benefit – nobody else.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Nov 30, 2009 11:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There are plenty of sunshine laws in state and federal law that give the public the “right to know” about matters of public record record by the government, Court. Those laws have certainly passed constitutional muster. So when the law is broken, or there is an investigation of laws being broken, generally the public is entitled to the output of the investigation. Frankly, that’s how it should be, because otherwise, our government could go even more haywire than it already has in the past 100 years.
Your larger point about Woods having the right to maintain his personal privacy is spot-on, however. What happened, or did not happen, is between Woods and his wife. Also involved is the young woman who has denied an affair with Woods, and one way or the other, the media has run roughshod over her. She has gone from being a socialite to a coke whore homewrecker overnight. Whether or not she had an affair with Woods, her reputation has been damaged by the speculation, fabrication and innuendo.
I for one will be glad when we can talk about golf again. You know, the sport where you hit a white ball down a green fairway.
by Old Man Par on Nov 30, 2009 12:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you are correct, of course, on the sunshine laws – but the media continually steps beyond the scope of the intention of releasing public records…to the point that our justice system gets played out more on TV than in the courts.
personally, I disagree that they pass Constitutional muster – but they were passed by courts like the 9th court of appeals in that bastion of Constitutional respect – San Francisco.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Nov 30, 2009 12:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If indeed the 9th ruled in favor of these laws — hard to believe given that there are states 4,000 miles away from that venue that have them — they have never been overturned by The Supremes.
by Old Man Par on Nov 30, 2009 12:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the 9th is a district court – they are a step below the Supreme Court.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Nov 30, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What’s your point? I know that the 9th is not above the Supreme Court.
by Old Man Par on Nov 30, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No Denial
Court……I did read that the “bimbo” denied the affair, but I’ve seen no such denial from Team Tiger. What he did say in his weak statement was the the there were unfounded rumors that were “irresponsible”….no denial. A “not true” would have been real easy, but didn’t happen. Do we have the “right” to know???…maybe not, but we may be “owed” a truthful explanation. After all we the fans have paid Tiger a Billion dollars. It is not asking too much for a little truth.
by em66 on Nov 30, 2009 12:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The fans have paid Tiger a billion dollars ??? I’d bet that goes about as far as yelling things like “I pay your salary” at a cop who is giving you a ticket.
Let’s see here – “unfounded” – means the reports are untrue. “Irresponsible” backs up the “unfounded” part – that the media was wrong to report such things. Pretty clear to me.
If you were in Tiger’s shoes, you would most likely be doing things the same way he is doing them. There is no evidence of a crime past unsafe driving. It is no business of anybody else’s.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Nov 30, 2009 12:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Weak
Ok, where did the billion dollars come from? Word games. Did you help Tiger write his statement. Unfounded does not mean untrue and does irresponsible really mean "I’m denying all the “unfounded” rumors?? No…not even close. Again, a simple statement that actually addressed the rumors would have gone a long way…….
by em66 on Nov 30, 2009 1:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What billion dollars are you talking about ? Some twit writes an article CLAIMING that Tiger has has made a billion dollars and another nit says he is WORTH a billion dollars…neither of which can possibly know the correct amount of Tiger’s earnings OR worth…Tiger and his financial people both have denied these reports, and other reports say he’s still a long way from the billion dollar mark.
If you say something is “unfounded” – you are saying that they are not true. Seriously, English isn’t the easiest language in the world…but it’s not THAT difficult.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Nov 30, 2009 1:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good
Nice sidestep. Ok, where did whatever amount of $$ Tiger has made come from? And thank you for making my point about “unfounded”. You say the my point about a billion dollars cannot be confirmed……so I guess I made an “unfounded” assumption…….but that doesn’t mean it’s not true….he may very well have made a billion dollars. Thanks for validating my point.
by em66 on Nov 30, 2009 1:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you brought it up – not me.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Nov 30, 2009 1:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
“the many false, unfounded and malicious rumors that are currently circulating about my family and me are irresponsible. "
Do you need him to say “I had no relations with that woman” or something clearer? Seems perfectly clear to me.
by Old Man Par on Nov 30, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ya he can deny the rumors but nobody can tell if he is lying or not. Yet there is even doubt that he wrote the statement.
by golf-nut on Nov 30, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
court
How long have you had this Woods’ butt kissin’ affliction ,lol. Legally, you’re right about the public having no right to know. However, in the" court of public opinion" Woods is being lambasted by his silence. The public pays the bills and it is only good PR to at least do a little lip service, just to feign that they matter. This privacey BS is bordering on paranoia. Woods is a public persona, for a very socially acceptable game. Hiding behind what his legal right’s are, versus being socially reponsible will have reprecussions. Perhaps he doesn’t give a $h!t as he certainly doesn’t need the money. He doesn’t owe the fans a thing, and that’s exactly why he should say something. Unless he’s hiding something sooooo perverse that nobody would forgive him. (not likely) Bangin’ some NYC hose monkey isn’t gonna lose him any support. Nobody really cares at this point. His actions are being viewed as a slight against the people who helped to make him an icon,… his public ! There’s an opportunity here to ingratiate himself to a game that has supported him. I hope he takes advantage…………………z.
by 3IRONS on Dec 1, 2009 2:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn you jumpn, you beat me to it….ditto on everything you said!
by niblic on Nov 30, 2009 11:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think Tiger needs to take a page from what Letterman did. He was being blackmailed for having a sexual relationship with one of the co-workers at the late show. What did he do. He came out the next day and told everyone what happened and cleared the air about everything.
Tiger needs to tell his story. If you refuse the FHP 3 times I feel that he is hiding something. Is he trying to protect his wife? Who knows. Now nobody knows for sure that he cheated on Elin. But I think its time Tiger came out and told his story. If he thinks he came find his way outta this he so wrong.
by golf-nut on Nov 30, 2009 1:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
so you’re saying that the FHP are blackmailing Tiger ? wow – now there’s a story ! (I know – not what you meant – I’m just kidding)
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Nov 30, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hasn’t he already denied the affair?
Hasn’t the supposed “other woman” – on this very website, as a matter of fact?
What more is there to say – have a confessional of innocence?
Letterman was being blackmailed for something he had done. Woods is denying he did anything, and so is his supposed lover. Big, big difference.
by Old Man Par on Nov 30, 2009 1:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ya she has denied it. But nobody believes her because of her past history having affairs with married men.
But the thing is Letterman had the nuts to admit his mistake. Now like I said nobody knows for sure that he had an affair. But I think he should come out and be truthful and say yes i had an affair or no I didnt. Its unlikely it will happen.
by golf-nut on Nov 30, 2009 2:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s like the Fark.com meme of saying that Glenn Beck must have raped and killed a young girl in 1990 because he’s never denied he did it.
by Old Man Par on Nov 30, 2009 2:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Enquirer is not pulling back
They have already refuted some of RU’s denials about not knowing some of the sources.
As much as everyone likes to bash the Enquirer, I don’t think they fire these shots unless they are loaded with ammunition – like they were for John Edwards.
by I_miss_Switzer on Nov 30, 2009 3:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Rachel didn’t tell me that she didn’t know Ashley Samson – she told me that they were not friends.
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 30, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
John Edwards Is a Former Client of Mine, And...
…that fellow was easy pickins’ for the tabloid press. His indiscretions were legendary in the legal community here, almost as legendary as his highly skilled courtroom tactics.
Just because a blind squirrel finds a nut once does not make it hound dog.
by Old Man Par on Nov 30, 2009 6:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if it was your story they refuted
But they seem to be begging Eldrick to push his denial. I think he folds his cards quietly in terms of litigation – he doesn’t want to see what they may be holding.
by I_miss_Switzer on Nov 30, 2009 3:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
They didn’t go after my story, just the two quotes that were provided to the NY Post and Daily News.
I think we’ll have to see how things play out with Uchitel now having Gloria Allred. Tiger won’t make the first move on a lawsuit, though.
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 30, 2009 4:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't reply in sequence
I wouldn’t be shocked if Allred is telling her “deny it publicly, keep your face in the news, and let’s get you some big $$$ to spill your guts to Oprah/Walters/whomever pays for that stuff”.
I also wager that she tries to portray her client as a victim of male oppression be she a victim of slander or the paramour of a rich golfer.
by I_miss_Switzer on Nov 30, 2009 5:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Haha, that last part, I can’t completely agree with
Find me! Email: ryan@thegolfnewsnet.com, Twitter: http://twitter.com/waggleroomryan, or Facebook: http://facebook.com/waggleroom.
by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 30, 2009 6:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















