Waggle Room: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: BCB Interview: Mike Fontenot Bar-right-arrows



Oh, Canada

Waxing nostalgic: I miss the days when the Canadian Open was a big tournament. Not that I'm quite old enough to remember the Canadian Open in all its glory. But now it's just another PGA Tour stop in-between the big events - in-between those "must play" tournaments that dot the schedule and reduce all other events to filler.

Excluding the U.S. Open and British Open, the Canadian Open is the second-oldest tournament on the PGA Tour (only the Western Open ... ahem, the BMW Championship, is older). But like the U.S. Open and British Open, the Canadian Open is a national championship.

And while it was never on the same level as those other two national championships, the Canadian was on a level just a smidge below. Sort of a WGC tournament of its time. The big stars wanted this title.

When Lee Trevino won the Canadian Open in 1971, he also won the U.S. Open and British Open - making him the first golfer to win all three in the same year (some guy named Tiger later did it, too). You don't hear anybody today extolled as the guy who won the U.S. Open, British Open and St. Jude Championship in the same year. But Trevino is still proud of that achievement, because when he achieved it, it was akin to winning the U.S. Open, British Open and Players Championship in one season.

Throughout his career, Jack Nicklaus was desperate to win this event. It's well-known that Nicklaus finished second seven times at the British Open. Not as well-known is that he finished second in the Canadian Open seven times, too. But he never won. He kept trying, though, and some of his best post-1980 showings came in a handful of majors and in the Canadian Open. Three times in the 1980s - 1981, 1984, 1985 - Nicklaus was runner-up here. He also finished second in 1965, 1968, 1975 and 1976.

The guys Nicklaus finished second to were, in chronological order, Gene Littler, Bob Charles, Tom Weiskopf, Jerry Pate, Peter Oosterhuis, Greg Norman and Curtis Strange. That's a pretty good champions row right there.

The tournament struggled into the 1990s, though, with sponsorship problems among other issues, and with fields thinning out. But it still produced some great champions: Tiger Woods in 2000 (he hasn't played the Canadian since 2001), Vijay Singh in 2004, Jim Furyk the last two years.

There's no way, with its "big event" strategy, the PGA Tour can keep all its tournament officials happy. Half the tournaments on the schedule are going to get the shaft - are going to appear to be the "B" team - no matter what. But if I were prioritizing events that deserved to be built back up, the Canadian would be one of them.

Update: Perhaps I wrote this too soon. Golfweek says there's a "Canadian Open revival under way."

0 recs | Comment 14 comments | Add your comment

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Amen brother !

...oh…not THAT kind of revival….. :-)

how the heck does a NATIONAL championship come up short on sponsorship dollars in a socialist country ? A little nudge from the government is supposed to open the purse strings.

I hope they get back on solid footing – they have had some really great tournaments and finishes. My favorite is still the Singh v Weir playoff. Weir had several chances to close it out and when his putts slid by, the gallery groaned louder than I have ever heard. On the holes he had to struggle to tie Singh, the cheer was as loud as any.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 22, 2008 4:34 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs

socialist country?

Every time I’ve been to Canada it looks pretty darned capitalist to me. Maybe you’re confusing our neighbor to the north with Cuba?

by dianemarie on Jul 23, 2008 10:04 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

sigh

socialism does not exclude elements of capitalism – businesses still function, but the government has a huge amount of control over the system.

cuba is a marxist military dictatorship – not communist or socialist

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 23, 2008 11:06 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I knew you'd fall for it

Are you talking about government regulation that keeps corporate greed from crashing the economy? Maybe you’re talking about a government that ensures all its citizens have access to quality healthcare? If that’s the kind of government control you’re talking about, then in the words of President George W. Bush, “Bring it on!”

Now back to our regularly scheduled golf blog…

by dianemarie on Jul 23, 2008 12:00 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

back to social studies for you ! :-)

I’m guessing you think we live in a democracy, too.

Don’t confuse a “free” medical system with the entire reach of socialism. Businesses are under the thumb of the government. Any kind of change or growth has to be allowed by the government.

Here’s a definition of socialism: Socialism refers to any of various economic and political concepts of state or collective (i.e. public) ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods and services, some of which have been developed into more or less highly articulated theories and/or praxis.

Socialism is a halfway step between communism and capitalism according to Marx.

By the way – that “free” medical system they have in Canada is hardly “free”. Canadians pay huge dollars in taxes to pay for the “free” system. Canadians flow across the border to access the American system because the waiting list for medical procedures and surgeries can stretch out for months.

oh – here’s a definition of democracy for you – two wolves and a sheep deciding what’s for dinner.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 23, 2008 12:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Canadians pay huge dollars in taxes to pay for the "free" system.

Money well spent. Canadians crossing the border doesn’t happen nearly as often as you suggest. Anytime someone objects to using tax dollars to ensure everyone has access to preventive healthcare and medical services, he uses the same three examples—been doing it for years.

The facts are that every industrialized country in the world except the US has some form of universal healthcare. Those countries spend significantly less per capita on healthcare, have a lower infant mortality rate and longer life expectancy. In short, a bigger bang for the buck. While you decry the collection of taxes to “help people besides you,” you fail to realize that a healthy population requires fewer other government services and is more productive.

I expect you work for an insurance company.

by dianemarie on Jul 23, 2008 12:37 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

strike three

nope – I don’t – but you sure do make a lot of assumptions about me and what I think and believe.

if every other industrialized country in the world was so superior to us – why do they keep sending their people here for treatment ?

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 23, 2008 1:22 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

you're right

I do make assumptions about you because everyone I know who makes the exact same arguments, using the same tired and unproven examples about healthcare here vs. the rest of the world that you have, always whines about taxes and government interference in free enterprise.

If I’m mischaracterizing you, if you don’t think that taxes are a liberal plot to redistribute your hard-earned cash and you don’t think representative democracy is inherently evil, I’ll retract everything.

Now, can we please get back to golf? I don’t mind having this discussion with you, but I’d rather do so in another forum where we won’t be abusing Stu and the others who frequent here. Any ideas?

by dianemarie on Jul 23, 2008 2:57 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

hmm

well it would be more fun with a beer and a putting green…but once you lost the argument you might come after me with the putter… ;-) (J/K !!!) :-D

by the way – where IS home ?

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 23, 2008 4:48 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs

cool

Atlanta, here. I grew up close to Akron – big Indians and Reds fan as a kid.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 24, 2008 1:23 AM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

reds?

My feeling is, Go Reds and take the Bungles with you. I’m not from here so I have no “hometown” loyalty. I’ve found Cincinnati fans to be a bunch of cry babies.

by dianemarie on Jul 24, 2008 9:43 PM EDT to parent up reply reply   0 recs

lol

I’m not from Atlanta, either – but I pull for the hometown teams. (then again – I grew up closest to Cleveland and the Indians – the one thing we were most remembered for was Pete Rose burying Ray Fosse at home plate in the All Star game) :-)

Sports fans aren’t what they used to be. It seems most “fans” think that if their team doesn’t win the championship, they are a bunch of losers. Sure would be a different Bengals team if their best players weren’t also the worst criminals.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Jul 25, 2008 10:11 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs

it seems like we have the thread to ourselves...

Cincinnati is weird like that. When Bob Huggins coached the Univ. of Cincinnati basketball team, he would recruit anyone. As a result, every year three or four players would be arrested for domestic violence, battery, drunk driving, illegal possession of a firearm, whatever. No one cared as long as “Huggs Thugs” won.

The best players on the Bungles are not criminals, but enough of the roster is, that it effects the team. And ownership puts up with it!

I moved here in ‘87. The Reds were in a tight Western Division race with the Giants. Near the end of the season, Cincinnati went to San Francisco for a four game series. The Giants manager was Roger Craig, a former pitching coach who had taught the staff to throw the split-fingered fastball, essentially a sinker. The Giants swept the series and went on to win the division. A Cincinnati sportscaster suggested that if the Giant pitchers had been “real men,” they would have spent the weekend throwing fastballs, the kind with no movement other than whizzing past the pitcher’s ear on the way to the left field bleachers.

So that’s what I live with, crybabys who have no concept of sports(person)ship. If they don’t win, the other team cheated or the officials (referees, umpires, whatever) were blind or didn’t really know the rules.

Anyway, one of the reasons I love golf is that it’s the golfer against the course, even in match play. There are some who whine about this and that, but most golf fans understand there are rules everyone lives by and if you’re having a better day than your fellow competitors, you may win. It really is the ultimate egalitarian sport; everyone has an equal chance of winning. Handicaps allow an old lady like me the opportunity to compete against the best in the game on a level playing field.

by dianemarie on Jul 25, 2008 7:32 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to Waggle Room, an SB Nation golf blog. Sit down, make yourself at home, and join our community by becoming a Waggler.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
Watch your Ebay/Paypal
Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
Wie signs of life ?
Small
world rankings
Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
No parades for Wie in Canada ???
Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
Can someone get Captain Paul an energy drink ?
Ryan_small
New Guy In Town
Small
FUTURES Tour Debut
Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
Groove changes finally adopted
Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
PGA at Oakland Hills CC this week
Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
Is Asia the new home of women's golf ?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Ryan_small Ryan Ballengee

ad

Site Meter