Kenny Perry's Decision
Kenny Perry's decision not to play the British Open - following on the heels of his earlier decision to skip U.S. Open qualifying - is drawing some criticism from a few of his peers:
Countryman Jim Furyk, who will likely be a team-mate of Perry in the US team for Valhalla, said he could not understand Perry's decision.
"To the best of my knowledge you can't win if you never play." he said. "You can't win on the couch.
"From a personal standpoint I'd have a very difficult time staying home when I had the opportunity to play in a major championship.
"He also made a decision not to play in the US Open and you would think that Torrey Pines would be right down his alley.
"But he says he never plays well there, doesn't like the course and decided not to."
Guess what, Jim: Perry says he never plays well in the British Open and doesn't like links courses, either. Or more to the point, doesn't like (British) links course weather. Windy, chilly, damp? Not for Kenny:
Perry, who has played only four Opens since his debut 17 years ago, has said he has no regrets over his no-show decision.
"I played Birkdale in '91, missed the cut there. My stroke average at the British Open is 76 point whatever," the world No. 16 said.
"I'm not good when it gets to 40 and 50 degrees (Fahrenheit) and 50 mile an hour winds. I'm a hot weather guy."
But Kenny's wrong about his British Open record.
Perry has played the British Open only five times in his career, in 1991, then not again until 2003. Then he played in '04, '05 and '06.
Perry makes it sound like he's stunk up the joint when he has played the Open Championship. And two of his five trips did result in missed cuts. But the other three were finishes of 8th, 11th and 16th. And his scoring average is nowhere near "76 point whatever":
- 2006: 73-74, mc
- 2005: 71-71-68-72, t11
- 2004: 69-70-73-72, t16
- 2003: 74-70-70-73, t8
- 1991: 73-76, mc
Does Perry really have the impression that his play in the British Open has been so poor? Or was he exaggerating for effect?
Hmmmm. I can't criticize Perry for playing the schedule that he wants to play (and it's hard to argue with that schedule when it's produced three wins in five weeks). That's his business (literally and figuratively). And nobody - including Kenny Perry - could have foreseen six or seven weeks ago, when he was making decisions about his schedule, that he'd be so hot right now.
But Justin Rose doesn't feel any compunction about criticizing Perry's decision:
"He's arguably the best player in the world right now (with Tiger Woods out injured) and I find it amazing he's not here," he said."His priority was obviously the Ryder Cup, but that's clearly signed, sealed and delivered, so this is a trip that wouldn't hurt his prospects.
"So it's strange. I couldn't imagine opting out of majors - it's what I want to judge myself on by the end of my career."
That's the one thing I wonder about with Perry's decision: Will Kenny look back on this period some day and say to himself, "What was I thinking?" He's 48 years old. He has 12 career victories. Perhaps he'll get another win or two (this season or before hitting the Champions Tour). But almost certainly, he'll never again have as good a chance as he does now at winning that major he hasn't won yet. And if Perry won a major, he'd get some Hall of Fame votes down the road. Without a major, none.
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
Maybe it's a financial decision...
Perhaps he understands that with the great year he’s having it’s his best chance to build up his retirement nest egg. With less competition at the US Bank championship, maybe he has a better chance of winning the $720,000 winner’s check than he does of finishing high enough to earn the same amount at The Open.
It’s just a thought but it might be a thought that goes through the mind of a guy who, prior to this summer, only had 9 wins in his career.
by Bogie Man on Jul 14, 2008 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
committment
don’t forget that Perry had committed to playing Milwaukee early on
and tell Justin Rose to be quiet – he’s 27 and has ZERO PGA Tour wins. This nonsense of wanting to judge his career based on the Majors is nonsense. (maybe a product of players making too much money to seriously care about winning regular events ?) You better get some regular wins under your belt before you start judging your career by the majors. You’re not Tiger Woods. He is the only You had one lucky finish 10 years ago and didn’t win then either – time to get a grip.
I agree that it seems odd to turn down a shot at a major when you’re playing this well – but the guy knows himself and he’s honoring his committment (though I’m pretty sure the people in Milwaukee would’ve been behind him all the way) Transportation was cheap – he had 3 seats available on a first class 767 for $1000 thanks to John Deere. (though I never did hear how they were supposed to get back) Oh – the weather for this week is supposed to be in the upper 50’s overnight to the mid 70’s – and think about all those fish-n-chips he’s missing ! :-)
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Jul 14, 2008 4:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Commitment
KP’s argument about having to committed to Milwaukee is bogus, IMO. How about Jay Williamson? He was in the Milwaukee field as of Friday afternoon, but once he secured a spot at the British, he obviously dropped out of Milwaukee. That’s what the alternate list is for. :) Same goes for Jerry Kelly. Milwaukee is a big event for him, being a Wisconsin guy, but he also dropped out once he got into the British as an alternate (I think when Luke Donald pulled out last week with an injury). If Jerry Kelly can do it to the hometown fans, I think they’d understand Kenny Perry doing the same thing.
by hawkeyedc on Jul 14, 2008 5:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand
Kenny Perry is an independent contractor. He’s free to work when and where he chooses. He’s under no obligation to live up to anyone’s expectations but his own. Maybe brats and a legendary Wisconsin Friday night fish fry appeal to him more than bangers and mash or fish and chips. Maybe he doesn’t like international air travel. Maybe he just didn’t want to expend his time to play courses he doesn’t like. Maybe he refuses to let other people define what he does or doesn’t do. Whatever the reason it’s his decision and I don’t understand why people feel the need to meddle in his business.
by dianemarie on Jul 14, 2008 10:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and don't forget...
...the occassional bottle of Miller Lite ! :-)
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Jul 14, 2008 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
You raise some good points. Perry is an independent contractor in a sense, and therefore gets to make his own schedule. This year, his goal was to make the Ryder Cup team. The thing is, he has reached that goal. So the rationale for the schedule is kind of shot now. Would it not make more sense to play against the guys he’ll be playing against at the Ryder Cup? And, even if his argument was Ryder Cup points, he should have noticed that four times more points are available at Birkdale than at Brown Deer.
by hawkeyedc on Jul 15, 2008 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
points
He probably noticed and made a conscious decision that they didn’t matter.
We’re so used to Phil over-thinking that when someone does the unexpected and whose choices don’t match our expectations, we don’t know how to act.
In golf, regardless of who your fellow competitors are, you’re really playing against the course. Anyway, he plays “against” those same guys most weeks on tour.
by dianemarie on Jul 15, 2008 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perry's in
Kenny Perry is sitting at #3 in Ryder Cup points. (remember – Tiger doesn’t count). The top 8 are automatically on the team and he has almost twice the points of #9, Woody Austin. Even if there was a way for 5 guys to double their points and bump Perry from an automatic spot, Azinger has 4 captains picks and he said he was going to take the guys who are winning – guess who the hottest (active) golfer on the planet is…
Perry just didn’t want to travel to England. We have been bombarded by media and players who say that ONLY majors count, including players who haven’t won a regular event – go figure. The guy is 47 and is allowed to pick when and where he wants to play – how did this get to be such a big deal ?
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Jul 15, 2008 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
THANK YOU!
I’ve been trying to get that point across for two days, but everyone seems to want to make Perry’s decisions for him. His reasons don’t matter, it’s his decision.
I wonder how those who think someone else should do what they want would feel if they were bound by their customers, direct or indirect, thoughts on when and where they should or should not work.
by dianemarie on Jul 15, 2008 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"playing against the course"
If you are right, and pro golfers are merely “playing against the course,” versus playing against their opponents (which I realize makes a lot more sense!), how in the world is Brown Deer a bigger challenge than Birkdale?
Other than your gratuitous Mickelson-slam, I’m not sure what your point is.
by hawkeyedc on Jul 16, 2008 9:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















