The LPGA TV Deals
There was some discussion down below on the post on Lorena Ochoa's opening round at the HSBC about the LPGA television deals. Or lack thereof. The HSBC Champions is getting only a one-hour highlight show on the Golf Channel, but we're probably lucky - given the time differences - that it's getting any U.S. TV time at all.
I thought it would be interesting to take this opportunity to explain the LPGA's TV deals.
There are two ways an LPGA tournament can get televised:
- Right-fee purchases by the network. For example, the PGA Tour's TV deal is entirely rights-fees. The networks pay a negotiated fee to the PGA Tour for the rights to broadcast specific events. The NFL TV deal is rights-fee, as another example.
- Time buys. Time buys involve the organization that wants its event televised purchasing a block of time on the network, and the network airing the requested programming. It's up to the organization whose event is being televised to sell advertising and - hopefully - recoup its investment or make a profit.
I contacted Sandi Higgs, the LPGA's Senior Director of Television and Emerging Media (Sandi has a cool title; henceforth, I wish to be known as the Senior Director of Blogging and Emerging Media for Waggle Room) and asked her about the LPGA's TV deals.
"Nearly all LPGA telecasts are time buys," Higgs said. "All of our events on (the major broadcast) network are time buys and all of our ESPN events are time buys.
"Golf Channel events are slightly different in that for up to 10 Golf Channel events, the LPGA does receive a bit of a rights fee for each event, but it's not a large sum."
So here's the deal:
- LPGA majors negotiate their own TV deals.
- Any other LPGA events on the broadcast networks are there via time buys; all of the LPGA's ESPN events are time buys.
- The Golf Channel has a rights-fee package - the network pays the LPGA - for "up to" 10 tournaments. Any tournaments beyond those 10 that air on the Golf Channel would be time buys.
But then, if the LPGA were making lots of money on its time buys, it wouldn't need to do time buys. The networks would recognize that advertiser interest and ratings were sufficient to warrant bidding on the rights.
Time buys are the fallback position. But they do have one good feature (aside from being the only other way to get your programming on the air, that is): flexibility.
Case in point: The NW Arkansas Championship. It was rained out last year, but no television coverage was planned anyway. This year, the LPGA snagged Proctor & Gamble as title sponsor. The event changed dates, and one reported reason for the date change is that P&G is going to get the tournament a broadcast network slot. That will be a time buy, either by the giant P&G itself, or by the LPGA (surely with the promise of enough P&G ad buys to recoup its investment).
The nature of the LPGA TV deals also explains why most tournament pages on LPGA.com do not yet list any TV information. The specifics of that TV coverage - part of the Golf Channel's rights-fee package, or a time buy? - may not be determined yet. Or whether there is going to be a time buy may not be determined yet.
So, to sum up: In the U.S. television market, the sad fact is that the LPGA has to pay to get most of its tournaments on the air. This is certainly another reason the LPGA is moving more strongly into Asia, where women's golf is hugely popular and where the LPGA should be able to do more rights-fee deals.
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
and that, dear friends...
by courtgolf on Feb 29, 2008 7:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
nice job!
What I'm curious to see is if the mainstream golfy media is going to be all in awe of Ochoa's dominating performance this week (the few who notice, that is) or if they'll short-circuit their response to the early Tiger and go from questioning her claim to #1 to complaining how boring her reign is. Probably too soon for that, but you gotta figure all the Sorenstam-boosters and Creamer fans are going to be disappointed if they can't stay within 10 shots of Lorena in her first tournament out.
You're already seeing big-time Ochoa backlash at Seoul Sisters....
by The Constructivist on Mar 1, 2008 6:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
backlash ?
Ochoa definitely came out firing on all cylindars, but here's what I'm seeing that I like very much:
Top 10 (after 3 rounds at least) - Sorenstam, Creamer, Webb, Stacy P, and Pressel. (Gulbis is not much further back at T-13) Also good to see Birdie Kim playing well again.
Most of these have played 3 weeks in a row with an awful lot of travel. Even though they are getting steam rolled by a fresh Ochoa, they are still filling the leaderboard.
Getting rolled by a big number, while putting up a pretty good number yourself, is never as bad as being right there and not finding a way to get it done in a close race. Ochoa isn't going to light up every golf course the way she has this one.
This is going to be a fun year.
by courtgolf on Mar 1, 2008 8:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree completely...
by The Constructivist on Mar 2, 2008 8:19 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm still missing it
Speaking of photography, how about that formal group shot ? These women really dress up nice ! I'm guessing nobody told Gulbis that it was a formal affair, not a high school prom. Not exactly the place for a miniskirt. Oh well.
by courtgolf on Mar 2, 2008 7:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
check the later pages....
by The Constructivist on Mar 3, 2008 3:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
maybe I'm asking the wrong question...
What I saw on that web site was grumbling from fans who apparently don't understand that players like Sorenstam are special and rare. Who knows if Ochoa can keep up this streak of amazing play ? It will take more than 1 great season to prove her greatness. Even the always annoying Johnny Miller who proved himself over a three year period isn't looked at in the same way as a Palmer, Nicklaus, Woods, Hogan, or Nelson, etc.
"Fans" who have no clue about how difficult it is to win a golf tournament are cattle that think their favorite player should be able to magically wave their putter and become #1.
Two Korean women EVER have shown flashes of dominant talent - Se Ri Pak and Grace Park. Both ran into injuries that cut short a real run at being #1 for an extended period of time.
As a group, the Korean women have been the most productive - but, except for World Cup, nationality doesn't count for anything in golf.
If it is the "fans" who are fueling this "backlash" - it will be felt mostly by the Korean golfers.
If the players listen to it too much, they will end up just like Se Ri Pak, who practically had a nervous breakdown because of all the pressure from back home.
So - my question should be - is this a backlash BY the Seoul Sisters (as it was asked originally) or is it a backlash AT the Seoul Sisters by the cattle...errr..."fans" and media who sit on the sidelines screaming that all their efforts are not good enough ?
by courtgolf on Mar 3, 2008 6:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry, my English is unclear
And, yeah, the site started off celebrating the Big 3 (Pak, Park, Kim) but took on a life of its own. Eric covers dozens of players in the bios on the sidebar and as you can see there are loads of forums.
I think you're painting the community there with too broad a brush, but that's a matter for another exchange.
by The Constructivist on Mar 3, 2008 12:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
MAGAZINE ??
How cool is that ?
Oh - which Kim ?
I thought that it was just some of the Korean women who were tagged as Seoul Sisters - didn't know if it was ALL the girls or just a few or just the ones actually from Seoul.
Wasn't trying to paint anything with a broad brush. Trust me, yours wouldn't be the only community that expects way too much from an athlete without a clue as to what they go through to play on Tour. I think a lot of people believe that just because they call themselves a professional golfer, they should win all the time and make it look easy.
We have way too much of that here in Atlanta - we have teams of very talented basketball, baseball, football, and hockey players - they just aren't good enough to win a championship, or even make the playoffs - but people insist on saying that they suck. I'm still waiting for one of these big mouthed "fans" to pick up a ball, bat, puck, or stick and try to do ANYTHING these guys can do.
by courtgolf on Mar 3, 2008 1:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
true, but...
The SS is pretty much alliterative metaphor.
On the unrealistic expectations thing, I think it's more a case of the regulars getting used to the winning years and getting frustrated by the recent drought. As long-time fans of Se Ri, the originals on the boards (I just joined last year) are sure familiar with her career's ups and downs and the struggles, and have agonized and celebrated along with her. We're talking about people who were invited to her HOF celebration, so that's where my broad brush comment came from.
Still, Hound Dog and I have gotten into a few low-level and mostly friendly spats in our brief time on the board, often when we let stats get in the way of fandom, so there is sometimes a taste of what you're talking about. But it's just a taste--with barely 200+ members posting, we're talking a very small proportion of people who are fans of the SS here.
by The Constructivist on Mar 8, 2008 1:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
anything on ratings lately?
by The Constructivist on May 6, 2008 5:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














