9 Fascinating Golf Stories of 2008 - #9: FedEx Cup Freakout
Here at Waggle Room, we're going to do the cliche thing around this time of year and do a countdown of the top such and suches of the year. For us, we're going to do the top 9 golf stories of the year.
The PGA Tour's FedEx Cup Playoffs may very well had been rendered meaningless this year if Tiger Woods had played more than six events and had more than one good leg all year. With four wins in six starts, it would have been easy to extrapolate a 10 win season for the world's best golfer.
Instead, though, Woods' knee injuries and subsequent surgeries forced El Tigre to the sidelines while the rest of the PGA Tour tried to take advantage. At different points throughout the regular season, fans saw flashes of domination and brilliance.
Anthony Kim won twice and managed to cement himself as a top tier name - grown more into legend by his play and demeanor at the Ryder Cup.
Phil Mickelson strung together a pretty decent season with a couple of wins, including on highlighted by a spectator jumping into the pond at Colonial in jubilation.
For a few weeks there, everyone was wondering if Kenny Perry would ever lose again ...and if he would actually man up to play a major championship or two.
Sergio Garcia found a way to putt well enough to survive Paul Goydos and Sawgrass. He was an up and down away from his first major championship at Oakland Hills.
The man who took that from him was Padraig Harrington. In the course of a month, he won back-to-back majors and tripled up his career major count. Up until around the Ryder Cup, he had people talking about the Paddyslam. That chatter will resume in April.
Toward the end of the year, though, Vijay Singh found his game - primarily the mental and phsyical ability to putt - and cruised to two straight victories in the FedEx Cup Playoffs. With a mediocre performance at the third event, the BMW Championship in St. Louis, Singh cemented himself as FedEx Cup champion barring disqualification or injury at the Tour Championship in Atlanta.

What seemed like a season champion decided turned into a firestorm of issues for the PGA Tour and its nacient points format.
Last season, fans and players complained that it was too difficult to for players to make moves during the Playoffs. It offered too much emphasis on the 30+ events in the regular season. The format was also railed because Tiger Woods rendered it meaningless by virtue of his season performance.
This season, fans and players complained that it was too easy to make moves in the standings. Back-to-back major champion Padraig Harrington didn't even qualify for the Tour Championship because he was too worn out from those victories to muster much in the Playoffs. Harrington took his fate like a professional, but others still complained.
It also didn't help that Camilo Villegas decided to pick up his first two PGA Tour victories in consecutive events - basically meaningless in regards to the question of who would win the FedEx Cup. Even though Villegas won two of the four events, like Vijay Singh, it was a single stroke that led to a missed cut at the Barclays that caused him to have no mathematical chance of winning the FedEx Cup.
All told, the FedEx Cup did determine the season champion. It also determined a host of new changes implemented by the PGA Tour for next season. What remains to be seen is if these changes will improve the format. And if Tiger Woods returns as brilliant as ever, will it even matter?
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
Tiger and Fed Ex...
…can’t buy the Tiger winning 10 and making the Fed Ex Cup meaningless argument – or maybe I’m missing your point. The two have nothing to do with each other. The Fed Ex Cup doesn’t crown anyone the champion of anything other than the series. Just because a player wins the regular season doesn’t mean they will continue on and win the Cup. The points reset starts the race all over.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Dec 8, 2008 3:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It renders it meaningless in this way
The Tour markets the FEC as a season long race to crown the champion of the season. We do agree that, really, it crowned the winner of four tournaments with some weighting this year. But let’s say that Tiger goes out there and creams the season for 10 wins. If he didn’t win the FEC, there would be a riot because everyone knows he is the best player.
With next year’s reset not happening until the Tour Championship, Tiger may be able to build up a lead so huge that he could skip 1 or more FEC events and still win the whole thing.
Basically, I’m saying that if Tiger (or any player) totally owns the Tour next season, then if they aren’t crowned FEC champion then the system is going to get it worse than ever from fans and media.
by Ryan Ballengee on Dec 8, 2008 3:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agreen AND disagree
Tiger dominated the first Fed Ex season – AND he won the big $10 million. IF you assume that the Fed Ex Cup HAS to go to the guy who had the best regular season, then there is no point in having the playoff series. If you’re going to complain if Tiger doesn’t win – then you further cement that argument.
The Fed Ex Cup points chase has nothing to do with rankings outside the seeding for the playoffs and finale.
The fact that people say things like this is a failing in the marketing of the whole concept. Tiger has dominated the season AND won the Fed Ex Cup – he was on his way to dominating another season this year – but that does NOT mean he would have won the cup again.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Dec 8, 2008 3:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
it’s a marketing flaw. In reality, they should be thought of separately.
by Ryan Ballengee on Dec 8, 2008 4:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
wins and status...
…are you separating Anthony Kim out because he is an American ? Villegas got his first wins this year – and in the Fed Ex series. AK just got an extra sprinkle of publicity and “hero” status because of the Ryder Cup. (USA USA USA !!) :-)
Not sure I would count Mickelnuts as anything close to a story this year. He was carried in the Ryder Cup by a rookie, he was miserable in the majors, and he only got 2 wins in a season that only had Tiger half the year. Not exactly a newsworthy year.
I would put Sergio ahead of Mickelson – plenty of strong finishes – a Players – and he was part of the Ryder Cup AND Fed Ex Cup excitement.
Kenny Perry should have gotten some talk in Player of the Year – at least honorable mention. What a year he had ! And he played well in the Ryder Cup – which was his catalyst for the year.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Dec 8, 2008 3:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I wanted to separate
the “regular season” from the FEC. No doubt that Villegas had a great finale, hence the love at the end. Mickelson didn’t have a great year by his standards, but a solid one. I agree that Sergio had a great year – big breakthrough at the Players for him.
Perry had a career year for himself, but I don’t think he should have been in the discussion for POY. Winning 2 majors is way bigger of a deal, and winning maybe the greatest major ever played with one leg is definitely bigger.
by Ryan Ballengee on Dec 8, 2008 3:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ok
so why leave Harrington off the list of stories ?
I wasn’t saying that Perry should or could have won the POY – he just deserved at little bit of a mention in the proceedings.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Dec 8, 2008 3:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm, good point
I’ll add Paddy and Serg. They deserve it, I suppose. :)
by Ryan Ballengee on Dec 8, 2008 4:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
don't get yourself labelled...
…a “Euro hater” !! :-)
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on Dec 8, 2008 4:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Haha
John Huggan probably already thinks I am.
by Ryan Ballengee on Dec 8, 2008 4:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














