New LPGA Sponsor, Same as the Old LPGA Sponsor
by Ryan Ballengee
on Nov 20, 2008 11:09 AM EST
15 comments
Stanford Financial sponsored the Stanford International Pro-Am in Miami this season on the LPGA Tour. In the new 2009 schedule, Stanford has shelved the International Pro-Am in favor of being the title sponsor of the new Tour Championship in their headquarters city of Houston. The limited field will be the same, and so will the purse of $2 million. The only differences are when and where.
But, the LPGA Tour put out a press brief yesterday entitled "Stanford Financial Group Becomes New Title Sponsor." If you thought yesterday was a whole lot of spin - admittedly, it was, but Biv deserves some credit here - then this tops the cake.
Stanford Financial Group, already a prominent sponsor in professional golf, will further expand their presence in the sport as it was announced today that the company will become the new title sponsor of the LPGA's Tour Championship.
Nothing changed!
Of course, I'm not in the public relations business, so maybe this was a condition of becoming a sponsor of the event that will replace the ADT Championship next season. Still, couldn't it have been written differently?
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
Stanford
May seem the same – but if you think about it, the LPGA was losing ADT and the season-ender. Stanford takes a higher position by taking on title of the Championship. The Pro-Am event in Miami goes away (or maybe not) but it is not full-field – more like Hope with 3-day Pro-Am and Sunday pro-only title..so even if it does not return, it does not affect the Tour that much.
I would think given the economic state of the world that moving an already committed golf sponsor to the Super Bowl, if you will is better than worrying about an exhibition game…
by TheGoogler on
Nov 20, 2008 11:56 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree that it's an upgrade
for Stanford on the schedule. No doubt about that.
I was saying that the field size will basically be the same for the TC as opposed to the Pro-Am, if what we have heard is true (around 100 players).
Still, why not present it/spin it as Stanford is so happy with the value of the LPGA Tour that they want to become an even higher profile part of it?
by Ryan Ballengee on
Nov 20, 2008 12:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No doubt
If you look at a comment that was made by Allen Stanford on The Golf Channel during the Stanford St. Jude Ch. in Memphis, he said that " They always looked to invest in undervalued properties and he felt the LPGA was one of those"
def. a better angle
by TheGoogler on
Nov 20, 2008 12:04 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Ok, we're on the same page
:)
by Ryan Ballengee on
Nov 20, 2008 12:06 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I must be missing something...
…Stanford had a prominent spot in professional golf before they got involved in that cluster@%&# of a pro-am. As you mentioned, they were involved in Memphis with the PGA Tour’s St Jude Classic. They sponsor several players on all four major American tours. And they have been involved with the “Eagles” charity.
Getting away from the pro-am and taking on the title sponsorship of the Tour Championship IS a step up on the LPGA Tour. It’s not spin – it’s just stating a fact. The Tour Championship is much more prestigious than a one year mucked tournament.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on
Nov 20, 2008 3:01 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
BUT
they are not a NEW title sponsor, which the press release implies. They’re an existing sponsor that’s taking a step up in prominence (which, I think, is a bigger deal than being a new sponsor). It wasn’t portrayed as such in the press release.
by Ryan Ballengee on
Nov 20, 2008 3:10 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it says...
…“the new title sponsor of the Tour Championship”. It doesn’t say that they are a new title sponsor period.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on
Nov 20, 2008 3:26 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The title is "new title sponsor"
and mentions nothing of their previous sponsorship.
by Ryan Ballengee on
Nov 20, 2008 3:33 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ok mr media... :-)
you’re not allowed to chop sentences in half like that. That’s called a mis-quote. Stanford is he new title sponsor of the Tour Championship. It’s not necessary to mention what they used to sponsor, especially since that thing they called a pro-am is history.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on
Nov 20, 2008 3:36 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The title of the article says "New Title Sponsor"
I swear that I’m not chopping anything up or misquoting. It’s in the title. :)
And from a PR POV, it’s critical to mention that this is a continuing relationship. Just like in philanthropic PR, it is almost always better to have a repeat than a new donor.
by Ryan Ballengee on
Nov 20, 2008 3:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
forget the headline
writers don’t come up with headlines – read just the quote you posted – it says “new title sponsor of the LPGA’s Tour Championship”.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on
Nov 20, 2008 4:02 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
But to say nothing of the previous sponsorship
is kind of ridiculous.
by Ryan Ballengee on
Nov 20, 2008 4:05 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
why ?
what doesn’t exist anymore isn’t important in something like this. why dredge up bad memories of a bad tournament ? best to just look forward in a case like this.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on
Nov 20, 2008 4:39 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Perhaps that was their angle
There were a decent number of complaints about the tournament. I guess, to me, keeping a sponsor is a big headline for the LPGA Tour. They put out a release about Michelob staying on.
by Ryan Ballengee on
Nov 20, 2008 5:01 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
they will...
…when they sleep it off. :-D
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
by courtgolf on
Nov 20, 2008 5:19 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
Related FanPosts on Waggle Room
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
New FanPost
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
