2008 PGA Tour by the Numbers and FedEx Cup 3.0
We've been talking in the past few weeks about the design of FedEx Cup 3.0 and how the PGA Tour often tries too hard to appeal to too many stakeholders - and ends up pleasing no one in the process. We also have talked about how the rank and file balk at anything that takes away their access to the millons and millions of dollars that the the A-list Tiger has made possible for them.
It may not have always been this way, though. Kin Lo's 2008 Tour by the Numbers has this fascinating graphic about prize money distribution over the last 30 years.
Basically, what you have here is a trend that shows a more even distribution of money over time. In effect, the middle 60% are taking home 20% more of the total purse available than they did 30 years ago. They're taking home 8% more than just eight years ago.
Lo suggests that there may be greater parity or better fields. In part, Lo may be right. With the emergence of stars from the Nationwide Tour over time, there is a better flow of players more likely to succeed on the PGA Tour and compete longer term.
Simultaneously, the growing number of invitational tournaments helps to assure that players have more concentrated access to money, i.e. fewer players to beat for more money.
Even further, the best players are entering fewer events on the whole. This means that, on a weekly basis, there are fewer players in the top fifth for the other 80% to beat. This leads to more money trickling down because someone has to win the money.
And, don't forget that the advent of the Fall Series over the past decade or more has led to opportunities for the 3rd and 4th quintiles to pick up some serious change without having to face as much of the top 40%.
What does this all mean for the FedEx Cup and any schedule changes in the future? Well, it means that the rank and file know that they are better able to get access to big bucks without having to fight off as many great players for it as often as they had to ten or fifteen years ago. They are going to fight very hard for their piece of "spreading the wealth around."
And to think that that so many Tour stars are Republicans...
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
not so much for the Fed Ex Cup...
…unless all of a sudden, the guys below 120 start lighting it up, bumping out the guys above 120 the first week. In the last 2 years, only a small handful of guys have managed to play out of their seeding. All of the whining and complaining doesn’t do these guys any good if they don’t play well enough to make the cut and finish in the top 30 to move on to the next week.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
Well, it does help in this sense
That 144 guys get into the playoffs in the first place. That’s a crock. It was set up so that the bottom 60% could be in it as long as possible without any fan being incredulous about it.
by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 14, 2008 3:53 PM EST up reply actions
144 get in...
…only 120 get out – and only half (or so) get paid for the first week. Only a handful got checks that first week.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
I wonder...
…what those numbers wuld look like if Toger Woods were removed from the top quintile?
You do that, and yu see not only how great Tiger is, but how much more competition there is week in and week out on tour. Sure, the factors you point to matter, but the great ones always scale back their schedules, pretty much whatever the era, right?
by The Constructivist on Nov 16, 2008 1:08 AM EST reply actions
on this table...
…it wouldn’t make any difference. This table is the breakdown of prize money by place in the field, not by individual players. It doesn’t matter who wins.
"this ball will fit in that fairway"
That's not the graph
This means that the players that finished in the top 20% of the money list are taking home a smaller percentage of the total purse for the season than they used to. So, TC’s example could be very interesting. But, in a given season, Tiger probably takes home approximately 4% of the total money available.
by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 16, 2008 5:38 PM EST up reply actions

by 















