Waggle Room: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Good God! Get Your Pro V1s NOW!

In September, Callaway won a lawsuit against Acushnet - the parent company of Titleist - for patent infringement related to technology and process used to create the current generation of Pro V1 ball.

Callaway decided to take things a step further, and they won.

The U.S. District Court in Wilmington, Del., granted Nov. 10 Callaway’s request for a permanent injunction stopping sales of the current line of Pro V1 family of golf balls, according to Callaway officials.

Star-divide

It's not all bad news because of the endless appeal cycle in our judicial system.

The Titleist camp, however, immediately countered, saying it would appeal the ruling. It maintained the court’s action would “not have any impact on our ability to supply our customers with Pro V1 golf balls.”

Also, Titleist is claiming that they aren't making balls under the same fashion that was the subject of the ruling in favor of Callaway.  Basically, they're saying that they don't make Pro V1s in a way that would violate other patents. 

In September, Titleist converted production of existing Pro V1 models “so that they are outside of the patents in question,” said Joe Nauman, executive vice president, corporate and legal of Acushnet Co., in a written statement. The Fairhaven, Mass.-based company owns the Titleist brand.

But it was unclear how many Pro V1s made before the conversion were still in the retail pipeline.

Titleist also is introducing its next generation of Pro V1 products in the first quarter of 2009; these balls also have been developed outside the scope of the patents in question, according to Nauman.

Therefore, why should they have to stop production?  I don't know that one yet.  But, the damage done between the enormous cost of the appeals process, the potential punitive award that Acushnet will have to pay, and the damage to their reputation as an innovator may be well worth the process for Callaway - fully knowing that the Pro V1 won't stop production forever.  Big win for Callaway today.

0 recs  |  Comment 13 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Naaahhhhhh...

…just switch to Wilson Zips ! :-)

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Nov 11, 2008 8:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I hit rock flites just as well

But then again, I don’t play often enough anymore to have that kinda feel.

by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 11, 2008 9:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

seriously...

…try the zips. I have had three guys who swore up and down they would never play another ball switch to the Zip after comparing it to their ProV’s. They liked the $20 price, too.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Nov 11, 2008 9:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll take a look at em

It’s been a long time since I’ve bought any balls!

by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 11, 2008 10:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Choices, choices

My question is, will Callaway just let the ball die, or negotiate a licensing deal with Acushnet?

by Double Eagle on Nov 12, 2008 10:57 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Pretty well sums up things, too

Basically:
1. Goodbye old Pro V1s manufactured before September. Can’t get em, gonna get burnt.
2. New Pro V1s are already out.
3. Still at stake is about $150M in damages from Acushnet to Callaway.
4. From that golf patent post I made a few weeks ago, they already have the ball to beat the new groove regulation lined up, so who cares.

by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 12, 2008 11:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

watch it !!

BURNING golf balls ?? First of all – BLASPHEMER !!! :-) Second – the tree huggers would have a fit – you’d probably put “global warming” 100 years further into the destruction of the universe.

They would give them away before burning or burying them – too many golf charities or youth programs out there to dump new balls like that.

The “damages” issue is the main thing. It will depend on how far back the courts decide to go back on these infringements. If Acushnet makes $100 million a year and they have been in breach for several years – you’re looking at $100-$300 million in “damages”. What bothers me is that Callaway filed these suits based on patents they acquired when they bought the TopFlite companies. They didn’t develop these patentss

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Nov 12, 2008 11:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

When they bought TopFlite

They bought the patents. I’ll bet that they bought TF knowing they could bring this lawsuit. Callaway is pretty smart. I’m sure they did their due diligence and knew they could ream Acushnet for a couple hundo mil.

by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 12, 2008 11:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

definitely

no doubt about it.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Nov 12, 2008 12:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lol

I don’t know if you saw it – but there was an email floating around around the time of the big bailout saying that the money Uncle Same was giving to these companies should just be divided up and sent to the people of the US (non-criminals over voting age, of course). I think the figure they gave was $475,000 per person over the age of 18.

As goofy as the idea was – I liked it. Instead of just handing money to companies that had already proved that they didn’t have the self-control to not give away loans to people who had no means or intention of paying back – let people decide where to invest the money. Let new companies grow – and if these big companies can’t draw people’s investments back – then they go under like any bad business should.

"this ball will fit in that fairway"

by courtgolf on Nov 12, 2008 12:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In the abstract

I’d be totally on board. Bretton Woods kinda ruined that, though. :(

by Ryan Ballengee on Nov 12, 2008 3:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Waggle Room! Join our community! Have a golf story tip? Contact editor Ryan Ballengee and he will follow the story.
Start posting on Waggle Room »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Tiger_and_the_magic_club_small
The Dubai WC trophy - unfortunate symbolism
Cat_small
The Curse of Donald Trump?
Images_3_small
Who is Jay Williamson and Why is He in the Final Stage of Q-School?
Biggie-worldtrade_small
Robert Allenby Would Like Brian Gay to See the World
Cat_small
2010 LPGA Derangement Syndrome sufferer- Bill Huffman
Cat_small
I found another mistake in the golf record books
Cat_small
Jill Painter whines that LA doesn't have LPGA event in 2010 or the golf media's new meme
Cat_small
Steve Elling is jealous
Cat_small
Collision Course: LPGA and Champions Tour in Oregon on Same Week!
Adam2_small
Ok, Now I'm on the Fence About Doug Barron...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Golf News Net Shows

The 19th Hole Golf Show - 11/4 - We start the show by discussing the HSBC Champions and LPGA Mizuno Classic.  Then we talk with top 100 teacher Charlie King about how he plans to change golf instruction.  And, finally, we talk with legendary golfer Tom Watson about a host of subjects, including Turnberry.

Listen NOW on the Golf News Net Media Player!

The 19th Hole Golf Show on iTunes

GNN Newsmakers Feed

GNN MP3 Players

The 19th Hole Golf Show

Waggle Room Media

Facebook, Twitter, & Podcasts - Oh My!






Managers

Ryan2_small Ryan Ballengee